Femoral residuum/socket kinematics using fusion between 3D motion capture and stereo radiography

B. PanhelleuxArts et Metiers ParisTech, IBHGC, Paris, France

N. FourgeronArts et Metiers ParisTech, IBHGC, Paris, France

N. RuyssenArts et Metiers ParisTech, IBHGC, Paris, France

P. Y. RohanArts et Metiers ParisTech, IBHGC, Paris, France

X. BonnetArts et Metiers ParisTech, IBHGC, Paris, FranceCorrespondence[email protected]

H. PilletArts et Metiers ParisTech, IBHGC, Paris, France

References

Bell AL, Pedersen DR, Brand RA. 1990. A comparison of the accuracy of several hip center location prediction methods. J Biomech. 23(6):617–621.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Convery P, Murray KD. 2000. Ultrasound study of the motion of the residual femur within a transfemoral socket during gait. Prosthet Orthot Int. 24(3):226–232.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Erikson U, James U. 1973. Roentgenological study of certain stump-socket relationships in above-knee amputees with special regard to tissue proportions, socket fit and attachment stability. Ups J Med Sci. 78(3):203–214.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Lu T-W, O’Connor JJ. 1999. Bone position estimation from skin marker co-ordinates using global optimisation with joint constraints. J Biomech. 32(2):129–134.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Papaioannou G, et al. 2009. Assessing residual bone- stump-skin-socket interface kinematics of above knee amputees with high accuracy biplane dynamic roentgen stereogrammetric analysis. 55th Annu Meet Orthop Res Soc.:Paper No. 346.
Google Scholar
Radcliffe CW. 1977. The Knud Jansen Lecture: above-knee prosthetics. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1(3):146–160.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Tang J, McGrath M, Laszczak P, Jiang L, Bader DL, Moser D, Zahedi S. 2015. Characterisation of dynamic couplings at lower limb residuum/socket interface using 3D motion capture. Med Eng Phys. 37(12):1162–1168.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar