Evaluation of novel implant topologies of disc in spine: custom cage implants design.

Y. Benabida Laboratoire Conception des Systèmes Mécaniques, Ecole Militaire Polytechnique, Alger, AlgérieCorrespondence[email protected]

N. Zeroudib Laboratoire Techniques Avancées de Fabrication et de Contrôle, Ecole Militaire Polytechnique, Alger, Algérie

S. Abida Laboratoire Conception des Systèmes Mécaniques, Ecole Militaire Polytechnique, Alger, Algérie

A. Azouza Laboratoire Conception des Systèmes Mécaniques, Ecole Militaire Polytechnique, Alger, Algérie

K. Chenaifia Laboratoire Conception des Systèmes Mécaniques, Ecole Militaire Polytechnique, Alger, Algérie

References

Bozkurt C, Şenköylü A, Aktaş E, Sarıkaya B, Sipahioğlu S, Gürbüz R, Timuçin M. 2018. Biomechanical Evaluation of a novel apatitewollastonite ceramic cage design for lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element model study. Hindawi BioMed Res Int. 2018:1–8.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
de Jongh CU, Basson AH, Scheffer ÃC. 2008. Predictive modelling of cervical disc implant wear. J Biomech. 41(15):3177–3183.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Deoghare AB, Kashyap S, Padole PM. 2013. Investigation of biomechanical behavior of lumbar vertebral segments with dynamic stabilization device using finite element approach. 3D Res. 4(1):6.
Google Scholar
McGilvray KC, Waldorff EI, Easley J, Seim HB, Zhang N, Linovitz RJ, Ryaby JT, Puttlitz CM. 2017. Evaluation of a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) titanium composite interbody spacer in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model: biomechanical, microcomputed tomographic, and histologic analyses. Spine J. 17(12):1907–1916.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Moojen WA, Bredenoord AL, Viergever RF, Peul WC. 2014. Scientific evaluation of spinal implants. SPINE. 39(26):2115–2118.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Chougule VN, Mulay AV, Ahuja BB. 2014. Development of patient specific implants for Minimum Invasive Spine Surgeries (MISS) from non-invasive imaging techniques by reverse engineering and additive manufacturing techniques. Proc Eng. 97:212–219.
Google Scholar