References
- Bornmann J, Kurzweg A, Heinrich K. 2016. Tragbare assistenzsysteme in der automobilmontage: Forschung und entwicklung innovativer orthetischer systeme zur physischen unterstützung wahrend der Überkopfarbeit.
- Butler T, Wisner D. 2017. Exoskeleton technology: Making workers safer and more productive. Proc. ASSE Prof. Development Conf.
- de Looze MP, Bosch T, Krause F, Stadler KS, O’Sullivan LW. 2016. Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics. 59(5):671–681.
- Gillette J, Stephenson M. 2017. EMG assessment of a shoulder support exoskeleton during on-site job tasks. Proc Annu. Meeting of Am. Soc. of Biomech.
- Grieve J, Dickerson C. 2008. Overhead work: Identification of evidence-based exposure guidelines. Occup Ergon. 8(1):53–66.
- Huysamen K, Bosch T, de Looze M, Stadler KS, Graf E, O'Sullivan LW. 2018. Evaluation of a passive exoskeleton for static upper limb activities. Appl Ergon. 70:148–155.
- Kim S, Nussbaum MA, Mokhlespour Esfahani MI, Alemi MM, Alabdulkarim S, Rashedi E. 2018. Assessing the influence of a passive, upper extremity exoskeletal vest for tasks requiring arm elevation. Appl Ergon. 70:315–330.
- Otten B, Weidner R, Argubi-Wollesen A. 2018. Evaluation of a novel active exoskeleton for tasks at or above head level. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 3(3):2408–2415.
- Parent-Thirion A, et al. 2012. Fifth European working conditions survey. Publi. office of the EU.
- Spada S, et al. 2017. Analysis of exoskeleton introduction in industrial reality: main issues and eaws risk assessment. Proc. Int. Conf. on Appl. Hum. Factors and Ergon, 236–244.
- Theurel J, Desbrosses K, Roux T, Savescu A. 2018. Physiological consequences of using an upper limb exoskeleton during manual handling tasks. Appl Ergon. 67:211–217.
- Van Engelhoven L, et al. 2018. Evaluation of an adjustable support shoulder exoskeleton on static and dynamic overhead tasks. Human Factors and Ergono. Soc. Int. Annu. Meeting.