308
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Abstract

Ex vivo biomechanical study on a porcine model of three types of stabilisation in scoliosis treatment

, , , , , , & show all

References

  • Boos N, Aebi M. 2008. Spinal disorders: fundamentals of diagnosis and treatment. Springer-Verlag.
  • Stokes IA, Burwell RG, Dangerfield PH. 2006. Biomechanical spinal growth modulation and progressive adolescent scoliosis – a test of the ‘vicious cycle’ pathogenetic hypothesis: Summary of an electronic focus group debate of the IBSE. Scoliosis. 1(1):16.
  • Schwab F, Patel A, Lafage V, Farcy JP. 2009. A porcine model for progressive thoracic scoliosis. Spine. 34(11):E397–E404.
  • Sheng SR, Wang XY, Xu HZ, Zhu GQ, Zhou YF. 2010. Anatomy of large animal spines and its comparison to the human spine: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 19(1):46–56.
  • Odent T, Cachon T, Peultier B, Gournay J, Jolivet E, Elie C, Abdoul H, Viguier E. 2011. Porcine model of early onset scoliosis based on animal growth created with posterior mini-invasive spinal offset tethering: a preliminary report. Eur Spine J. 20(11):1869–1876.
  • Chun K, Yang I, Kim N, Cho D. 2015. Effect of device rigidity and physiological loading on spinal kinematics after dynamic stabilization: an in-vitro biomechanical study. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 58(5):412–418.
  • Korovessis P, Papazisis Z, Koureas G, Lambiris E. 2004. Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results. Spine. 29(7):735–742.