Anisotropic bone response based on FEM simulation and real micro computed tomography of bovine bone

S. Wronskia Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, PolandCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information

J. Kaminskia Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, PolandView further author information

A. Wita Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, PolandView further author information

J. Tarasiuka Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, PolandView further author information

P. Lipinskib LEM3, University of Lorraine (ENIM), Metz Cedex 3, FranceView further author information

References

Abramoff MD, Magalhães PJ, Ram SJ. 2004. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophoton Int. 11(7):36–42.
Google Scholar
Creuillot V, Dreistadt C, Kalinski K, Lipinski P. 2016. Advances in intelligent systems and computing. 414:15–32.
Google Scholar
Doube M, Kłosowski MM, Arganda-Carreras I, Cordelières FP, Dougherty RP, Jackson JS, Schmid B, Hutchinson JR, Shefelbine SJ. 2010. BoneJ: free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ. Bone. 47(6):1076–1107.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Gross T, Pahr DH, Zysset PK. 2013. Morphology–elasticity relationships using decreasing fabric information of human trabecular bone from three major anatomical locations. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 12(4):793–800.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Medtool Manual 4.3. [accessed 2019 May 21]. http://www.dr-pahr.at/html/01.html.
Google Scholar
Zadpoor AA, Weinans H. 2015. Patient-specific bone modeling and analysis: the role of integration and automation in clinical adoption. J Biomech. 48(5):750–760.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Zysset PK, Curnier A. 1995. An alternative model for anisotropic elasticity based on fabric tensors. Mech Mater. 19:240–254.
Google Scholar