Innovative decision support for scoliosis brace therapy based on statistical modelling of markerless 3D trunk surface data

References

• Bryan R, Mohan PS, Hopkins A, Galloway F, Taylor M, Nair PB. 2010. Statistical modelling of the whole human femur incorporating geometric and material properties. Med Eng Phys. 32(1):57–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb RJ. 1948. Outline for the study of scoliosis. Instructional Course Lectures. Am Acad Orthop Surg. 5:261–275.
   Google Scholar
• Doody MM, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Hacker DG, Luckyanov N, Land CE. 2000. Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the U.S. scoliosis cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 25(16):2052–2063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drerup B. 1978. Application of Moiré topography to diagnosis and documentation of anomalies of the trunk (author’s transl)). Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 116(6):789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drerup B. 1984. Principles of measurement of vertebral rotation from frontal projections of the pedicles. J Biomech. 17(12):923–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drerup B. 1985. Improvements in measuring vertebral rotation from the projections of the pedicles. J Biomech. 18(5):369–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drerup B. 2014. Rasterstereographic measurement of scoliotic deformity. Scoliosis. 9(1):22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drerup B, Ellger B, Meyer zu Bentrup FM, Hierholzer E. 2001. [Functional rasterstereographic images. A new method for biomechanical analysis of skeletal geometry]. Orthopade. 30(4):242–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drerup B, Hierholzer E. 1992a. Evaluation of frontal radiographs of scoliotic spines–Part I. Measurement of position and orientation of vertebrae and assessment of clinical shape parameters. J Biomech. 25(11):1357–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drerup B, Hierholzer E. 1992b. Evaluation of frontal radiographs of scoliotic spines–Part II. Relations between lateral deviation, lateral tilt and axial rotation of vertebrae. J Biomech. 25(12):1443–1450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drerup B, Hierholzer E. 1994. Back shape measurement using video rasterstereography and three-dimensional reconstruction of spinal shape. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 9(1):28–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drerup B, Hierholzer E. 1996. Assessment of scoliotic deformity from back shape asymmetry using an improved mathematical model. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 11(7):376–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaneei M, Ekyalimpa R, Westover L, Parent EC, Adeeb S. 2019. Customized k-nearest neighbourhood analysis in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using 3D markerless asymmetry analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 22(7):696–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaneei M, Komeili A, Li Y, Parent EC, Adeeb S. 2018. 3D Markerless asymmetry analysis in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 19(1):385.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hill S, Franco-Sepulveda E, Komeili A, Trovato A, Parent E, Hill D, Lou E, Adeeb S. 2014. Assessing asymmetry using reflection and rotoinversion in biomedical engineering applications. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 228(5):523–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill DL, Berg DC, Raso VJ, Lou E, Durdle NG, Mahood JK, Moreau MJ. 2002. Evaluation of a laser scanner for surface topography. Stud Health Technol Inform. 88:90–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffman DA, Lonstein JE, Morin MM, Visscher W, Harris BS, 3rd, Boice JD. Jr. 1989. Breast cancer in women with scoliosis exposed to multiple diagnostic x rays. J Natl Cancer Inst. 81(17):1307–1312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Komeili A, Westover L, Parent EC, El-Rich M, Adeeb S. 2015a. Correlation between a novel surface topography asymmetry analysis and radiographic data in scoliosis. Spine Deform. 3(4):303–311.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Komeili A, Westover L, Parent EC, El-Rich M, Adeeb S. 2015b. Monitoring for idiopathic scoliosis curve progression using surface topography asymmetry analysis of the trunk in adolescents. Spine J. 15(4):743–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komeili A, Westover LM, Parent EC, Moreau M, El-Rich M, Adeeb S. 2014. Surface topography asymmetry maps categorizing external deformity in scoliosis. Spine J. 14(6):973–983.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moramarco K, Borysov M. 2017. A modern historical perspective of schroth scoliosis rehabilitation and corrective bracing techniques for idiopathic Scoliosis. Open Orthop J. 11:1452–1465.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nash CL, Gregg EC, Brown RH, Pillai K. 1979. Risks of exposure to X-rays in patients undergoing long-term treatment for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 61(3):371–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach JW. 2008. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet. 371(9623):1527–1537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogala EJ, Drummond DS, Gurr J. 1978. Scoliosis: incidence and natural history. A prospective epidemiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 60(2):173–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronckers CM, Doody MM, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Land CE. 2008. Multiple diagnostic X-rays for spine deformities and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 17(3):605–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronckers CM, Land CE, Miller JS, Stovall M, Lonstein JE, Doody MM. 2010. Cancer mortality among women frequently exposed to radiographic Examinations for Spinal Disorders. Radiat Res. 174(1):83–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thulbourne T, Gillespie R. 1976. The rib hump in idiopathic scoliosis. Measurement, analysis and response to treatment. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 58-B(1):64–71.
   Google Scholar
• Vollmer J, Mencl R, Müller H. 1999. Improved Laplacian Smoothing of Noisy Surface Meshes. EUROGRAPHICS ‘99/P. Brunet and R. Scopigno (Guest Editors). 18:3.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss HR. 2010. "Brace technology" thematic series - the Gensingen brace™ in the treatment of scoliosis. Scoliosis. 5:22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss HR, Lehnert-Schroth C, Moramarco M, Moramarco K. 2018. Schroth Therapy – Advancements in conservative scoliosis treatment. 2nd ed. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing (LAP).
   Google Scholar
• Weiss HR, Lohschmidt K, El Obeidi N. 1997. The automated surface measurement of the trunk. In: Sevastik JA, Diab KM, editors. Research into spinal deformities. Amsterdam: IOS Press; p. 305–308.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss HR, Moramarco M. 2017. The changing paradigm in the management of spinal deformities. Open Orthop J. 11:1449–1451.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss HR, Seibel S. 2013. Region of interest in the radiological follow-up of patients with scoliosis. Hard Tissue. 2(4):33.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss HR, Tournavitis N, Nan X, Borysov M, Paul L. 2017a. Workflow of CAD/CAM scoliosis brace adjustment in preparation using 3D Printing. Open Med Inform J. 11:44–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss HR, Tournavitis N, Seibel S, Kleban A. 2017b. A prospective cohort study of AIS patients with 40° and more treated with a Gensingen Brace (GBW): Preliminary results. Open Orthop J. 11:1558–1567.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss HR, Turnbull D, Seibel S, Kleban A. 2019. First end-result of a prospective cohort with AIS treated with a CAD Chêneau style brace. J Phys Ther Sci. 31(12):983–991.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winkler J, Gkantidis N. 2020. Trueness and precision of intraoral scanners in the maxillary dental arch: an in vivo analysis. Sci Rep. 10(1):1172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar