Effect of the dimensions of implant body and thread on bone resorption and stability in trapezoidal threaded dental implants: a sensitivity analysis and optimization

References

• Amaral CF, Gomes RS, Garcia RCR, Cury A. 2018. Stress distribution of single-implant–retained overdenture reinforced with a framework: a finite element analysis study. J Prosthet Dent. 119(5):791–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ao J, Li T, Liu Y, Ding Y, Wu G, Hu K, Kong L. 2010. Optimal design of thread height and width on an immediately loaded cylinder implant: a finite element analysis. Comput Biol Med. 40(8):681–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashrafi M, Ghalichi F, Mirzakouchaki B, Arruga A, Doblare M. 2020. Finite element comparison of the effect of absorbers’ design in the surrounding bone of dental implants. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 36(1):e3270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausiello P, Franciosa P, Martorelli M, Watts DC. 2012. Effects of thread features in osseo-integrated titanium implants using a statistics-based finite element method. Dent Mater. 28(8):919–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, Maceri F, Vairo G. 2008. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 100(6):422–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavazzuti M. 2013. Optimization methods: from theory to design. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Chang CL, Chen CS, Huang CH, Hsu ML. 2012. Finite element analysis of the dental implant using a topology optimization method. Med Eng Phys. 34(7):999–1008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang J, Tsai P, Kuo M, Sun J, Chen S, Shen H. 2019. Augmentation of DMLS biomimetic dental implants with weight-bearing strut to balance of biologic and mechanical demands: from bench to animal. Materials. 12(1):164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng YC, Lin DH, Jiang CP, Lee SY. 2015. Design improvement and dynamic finite element analysis of novel ITI dental implant under dynamic chewing loads. Biomed Mater Eng. 26(s1):S555–S561.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chidagam P, Gande VC, Yadlapalli S, Venkata RY, Kondaka S, Chedalawada S. 2017. Immediate versus delayed loading of implant for replacement of missing mandibular first molar: a randomized prospective six years clinical study. J Clin Diagn Res. 11(4):ZC35–ZC39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrêa CB, Margonar R, Noritomi PY, Vaz LG. 2014. Mechanical behavior of dental implants in different positions in the rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla. J Prosthet Dent. 111(4):301–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dávila E, Ortiz-Hernández M, Perez R, Herrero-Climent M, Cerrolaza M, Gil F. 2019. Crestal module design optimization of dental implants: finite element analysis and in vivo studies. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 30(8):90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilek O, Tezulas E, Dincel M. 2008. Required minimum primary stability and torque values for immediate loading of mini dental implants: an experimental study in nonviable bovine femoral bone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 105(2):e20–e27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djebbar N, Serier B, Bouiadjra BB. 2017. Stress distribution of the variable dynamic loading in the dental implant: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Biomim Biomater Biomed Eng. 31:44–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghadiri M, Shafiei N, Salekdeh SH, Mottaghi P, Mirzaie T. 2016. Investigation of the dental implant geometry effect on stress distribution at dental implant–bone interface. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 38(2):335–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haiat G, Wang HL, Brunski J. 2014. Effects of biomechanical properties of the bone-implant interface on dental implant stability: from in silico approaches to the patient’s mouth. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 16:187–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I-Chiang C, Shyh-Yuan L, Ming-Chang W, Sun C-W, Jiang C-P. 2014. Finite element modelling of implant designs and cortical bone thickness on stress distribution in maxillary type IV bone. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 17(5):516–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung RE, Herzog M, Wolleb K, Ramel CF, Thoma DS, Hämmerle CH. 2017. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing small buccal dehiscence defects around dental implants treated with guided bone regeneration or left for spontaneous healing. Clin Oral Implants Res. 28(3):348–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong L, Sun Y, Hu K, Li D, Hou R, Yang J, Liu B. 2008. Bivariate evaluation of cylinder implant diameter and length: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthodont. 17(4):286–293.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kong L, Zhao Y, Hu K, Li D, Zhou H, Wu Z, Liu B. 2009. Selection of the implant thread pitch for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Adv Eng Softw. 40(7):474–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J-I, Lee Y, Kim Y-L, Cho H-W. 2016. Effect of implant number and distribution on load transfer in implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses for the anterior maxilla: a photoelastic stress analysis study. J Prosthet Dent. 115(2):161–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lekholm U. 1985. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, editors. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago (IL): Quintessence Publishing Company; p. 199–209.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Jansen JA, Walboomers XF, van den Beucken JJ. 2020. Mechanical aspects of dental implants and osseointegration: a narrative review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 103:103574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Hu K, Cheng L, Ding Y, Ding Y, Shao J, Kong L. 2011. Optimum selection of the dental implant diameter and length in the posterior mandible with poor bone quality – a 3D finite element analysis. Appl Math Model. 35(1):446–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Kong L, Wang Y, Hu K, Song L, Liu B, Li D, Shao J, Ding Y. 2009. Selection of optimal dental implant diameter and length in type IV bone: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 38(10):1077–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohyama T, Yasuda H, Shibuya N, Tadokoro S, Nakabayashi S, Namaki S, Hara Y, Ogawa T, Ishigami T. 2017. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effects of implant diameter and photofunctionalization on peri-implant stress. J Oral Sci. 59(2):273–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormianer Z, Matalon S, Block J, Kohen J. 2016. Dental implant thread design and the consequences on long-term marginal bone loss. Implant Dent. 25(4):471–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswal MM, Amasi UN, Oswal MS, Bhagat AS. 2016. Influence of three different implant thread designs on stress distribution: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 16(4):359–365.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanić V, Dimitrijević S, Antonović DG, Jokić BM, Zec SP, Tanasković ST, Raičević S. 2014. Synthesis of fluorine substituted hydroxyapatite nanopowders and application of the central composite design for determination of its antimicrobial effects. Appl Surf Sci. 290:346–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugiura T, Yamamoto K, Horita S, Murakami K, Tsutsumi S, Kirita T. 2017. Effects of implant tilting and the loading direction on the displacement and micromotion of immediately loaded implants: an in vitro experiment and finite element analysis. J Periodont Implant Sci. 47(4):251–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda N, Takayama Y, Yokoyama A. 2017. Minimization of dental implant diameter and length according to bone quality determined by finite element analysis and optimized calculation. J Prosthodont Res. 61(3):324–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazicioğlu D, Uyanik L, Sayan N. 2009. Computer assisted three-dimensional planning for dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 38(5):551–552.
   Google Scholar
• Zanetti EM, Bignardi C. 2009. Structural analysis of skeletal body elements: numerical and experimental methods. In: Leondes CT, editor. Biomechanical systems technology: muscular skeletal systems. Vol. 3. Hackensack (NJ): World Scientific; p. 185–225.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang G, Yuan H, Chen X, Wang W, Chen J, Liang J, Zhang P. 2016. A three-dimensional finite element study on the biomechanical simulation of various structured dental implants and their surrounding bone tissues. Int J Dent. 2016:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar