1,417
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Thread shape affects the stress distribution of torque force on miniscrews: a finite element analysis

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1034-1040 | Received 28 Jan 2020, Accepted 16 Jun 2020, Published online: 03 Jul 2020

References

  • Abuhussein H, Pagni G, Rebaudi A, Wang HL. 2010. The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration: review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 21(2):129–136.
  • Boccaccio A, Lamberti L, Pappalettere C, Carano A, Cozzani M. 2006. Mechanical behavior of an osteotomized mandible with distraction orthodontic devices. J Biomech. 39(15):2907–2918.
  • Brinley CL, Behrents R, Kim KB, Sridhar C, Kyung HM, Buschang PH. 2009. Pitch and longitudinal fluting effects on the primary stability of miniscrew implants. Angle Orthod. 79(6):1156–1161.
  • Chang HP, Tseng YC. 2014. Miniscrew implant applications in contemporary orthodontics. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 30(3):111–115.
  • Chang JZC, Chen YJ, Tung YY, Chiang YY, Lai EHH, Chen WP, Lin CP. 2012. Effects of thread depth, taper shape, and taper length on the mechanical properties of mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 141(3):279–288.
  • Dalstra M, Cattaneo P, Melsen B. 2004. Load transfer of miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage. Orthodontics. 1:53–62.
  • Desai S, Singh R, Karthikeyan I. 2013. 2D FEA of evaluation of micromovements and stresses at bone-implant interface in immediately loaded tapered implants in the posterior maxilla. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 17(5):637–643.
  • Duaibis R, Kusnoto B, Natarajan R, Zhao L, Evans C. 2012. Factors affecting stresses in cortical bone around miniscrew implants: a three-dimensional finite element study. Angle Orthod. 82:875–880.
  • Eraslan O, Inan O. 2010. The effect of thread design on stress distribution in a solid screw implant: a 3D finite element analysis. Clin Oral Invest. 14(4):411–416.
  • Fattahi H, Ajami S, NabavizadehRafsanjani A. 2015. The effects of different miniscrew thread designs and force directions on stress distribution by 3-dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent (Shiraz). 16(4):341–348. Iran).
  • Fuh L-J, Hsu J-T, Huang H-L, Chen MY, Shen Y-W. 2013. Biomechanical investigation of thread designs and interface conditions of zirconia and titanium dental implants with bone: three-dimensional numeric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 28(2):e64–e71.
  • Geng JP, Ma QS, Xu W, Tan KBC, Liu GR. 2004. Finite element analysis of four thread-form configurations in a stepped screw implant. J Oral Rehabil. 31(3):233–239.
  • Gracco A, Cirignaco A, Cozzani M, Boccaccio A, Pappalettere C, Vitale G. 2009. Numerical/experimental analysis of the stress field around miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage. Eur J Orthod. 31(1):12–20.
  • Gracco A, Giagnorio C, Incerti Parenti S, Alessandri Bonetti G, Siciliani G. 2012. Effects of thread shape on the pullout strength of miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 142(2):186–190.
  • Guo D, Chang S, Hu L, Lu Y, Ye Y. 2012. Biomechanics of upper molar uprighting with Tomas microimplant: a finite element study. Chin J Orthod. 19:86–91.
  • Han CM, Watanabe K, Tsatalis AE, Lee D, Zheng F, Kyung HM, Deguchi T, Kim DG. 2019. Evaluations of miniscrew type-dependent mechanical stability. Clin Biomech. 69:21–27.
  • Hohmann A, Wolfram U, Geiger M, Boryor A, Sander C, Faltin R, Faltin K, Sander FG. 2007. Periodontal ligament hydrostatic pressure with areas of root resorption after application of a continuous torque moment. Angle Orthod. 77(4):653–659.
  • Ivanoff CJ, Gröndahl K, Sennerby L, Bergström C, Lekholm U. 1999. Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 14(2):173–180.
  • Kasani R, Rama Sai Attili BK, Dommeti VK, Merdji A, Biswas JK, Roy S. 2019. Stress distribution of overdenture using odd number implants – a finite element study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 98:369–382.
  • Kim W, Cha Y, Oh S. 2001. The three dimensional finite element analysis of stress according to implant thread design under the axial load. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 27:3–8.
  • Lan Z, Lin Z, Li N. 2001. The effects of implant morphology on stress distribution in implant-bone interface. J Pr Stomatol. 7:246–248.
  • Lee J, Jeong YH, Pittman J, Deguchi T, Johnston WM, Fields HW, Kim DG. 2017. Primary stability and viscoelastic displacement of mini-implant system under loading. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 41:28–33.
  • Lim HJ, Eun CS, Cho JH, Lee KH, Hwang HS. 2009. Factors associated with initial stability of miniscrews for orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 136(2):236–242.
  • Liu J, Pan S, Dong J, Mo Z, Fan Y, Feng H. 2013. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent. 41(3):241–249.
  • Liu TC, Chang CH, Wong TY, Liu JK. 2012. Finite element analysis of miniscrew implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 141(4):468–476.
  • Long H, Lin Z, Lan Z, Zhou L. 2003. The effects of implant shapes on stress distribution in implant-bone interface. Chin J Oral Implantol. 8:61–63.
  • Lu Y, Chang S, Wu H, Yu YYY. 2013. Influence of the diameter and length of the mini-implant on the primary stability after loading with composite forces. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 48:37–40. [].
  • Lu Y, Chang S, Wu H, Yu Y, Ye Y, Chang L, Wang W. 2014. Selection of optimal length and diameter of mini implant in two different forces: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 32(1):85–90.
  • Lu Y, Chang S, Ye J, Ye Y, Yu Y. 2015. Analysis on the stress of the bone surrounding mini-implant with different diameters and lengths under torque. BME. 26(s1):S541–S545.
  • Lu YJ, Chang SH, Ye JT, Ye YS, Yu YS. 2015. Finite Element Analysis of Bone Stress around Micro-Implants of Different Diameters and Lengths with Application of a Single or Composite Torque Force. PLoS One. 10(12):e0144744.
  • Ma P, Xiong W, Tan B, Geng W, Liu J, Li W, Li D. 2014. Influence of thread pitch, helix angle, and compactness on micromotion of immediately loaded implants in three types of bone quality: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2014(:983103
  • Marquezan M, Mattos CT, Sant'Anna EF, de Souza MMG, Maia LC. 2014. Does cortical thickness influence the primary stability of miniscrews?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Angle Orthod. 84(6):1093–1103.
  • Motoyoshi M, Inaba M, Ueno S, Shimizu N. 2009. Mechanical anisotropy of orthodontic mini-implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 38(9):972–977.
  • Radwan ES, Montasser MA, Maher A. 2018. Influence of geometric design characteristics on primary stability of orthodontic miniscrews. J Orofac Orthop. 79(3):191–203.
  • Reynders R, Ronchi L, Bipat S. 2009. Mini-implants in orthodontics: A systematic review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 135(5):564.e1
  • Rieger MR, Adams WK, Kinzel GL. 1990. A finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 63(4):457–465.
  • Tada S, Stegaroiu R, Kitamura E, Miyakawa O, Kusakari H. 2003 May-Jun. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 18(3):357–368.
  • Valen M. 1983. The relationship between endosteal implant design and function: maximum stress distribution with computer-formed, three dimensional Flexi-Cup blades. J Oral Implantol. 11(1):49–71.
  • Wakabayashi N, Ona M, Suzuki T, Igarashi Y. 2008. Nonlinear finite element analyses: Advances and challenges in dental applications. J Dent. 36(7):463–471.
  • Wilmes B, Ottenstreuer S, Su Y-Y, Drescher D. 2008. Impact of implant design on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. J Orofac Orthop. 69(1):42–50.
  • Woodall N, Tadepalli SC, Qian F, Grosland NM, Marshall SD, Southard TE. 2011. Effect of miniscrew angulation on anchorage resistance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 139(2):e147–152.