Implant primary stability with an osteocondensation drilling protocol in different density polyurethane blocks

References

• Albrektsson T, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. 2003. Osseointegration: historic background and current concepts. Clin Periodontol Implant Dent. 4:809–820.
   Google Scholar
• Albrektsson T, Lekholm U. 1989. Osseointegration: current state of the art. Dent Clin North Am. 33(4):537–554.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al-Jetaily S, Al-Dosari AA. 2011. Assessment of OsstellTM and Periotest® systems in measuring dental implant stability (in vitro study). Saudi Dent J. 23(1):17–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bogovič V, Svete A, Bajsić I. 2016. Effects of a drill diameter on the temperature rise in a bone during implant site preparation under clinical conditions. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 230(10):907–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comuzzi L, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Tumedei M. 2019. An in vitro evaluation, on polyurethane foam sheets, of the insertion torque (IT) values, pull-out torque values, and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) of nanoshort dental implants. Polymers. 11(6):1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comuzzi L, Tumedei M, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. 2019. Short vs. standard length cone morse connection implants: an in vitro pilot study in low density polyurethane foam. Symmetry. 11(11):1349.
   Google Scholar
• Comuzzi L, Tumedei M, Pontes AE, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. 2020. Primary stability of dental implants in low-density (10 and 20 pcf) polyurethane foam blocks: conical vs cylindrical implants. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17(8):2617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comuzzi L, Tumedei M, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. 2020. Osseodensification drilling vs. standard protocol of implant site preparation: an in vitro study on polyurethane foam sheets. Prosthesis. 2(2):76–86.
   Google Scholar
• Cordioli G, Majzoub Z, Piattelli A, Scarano A. 2000. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 15(5):668–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degidi M, Daprile G, Piattelli A. 2012. Primary stability determination by means of insertion torque and RFA in a sample of 4,135 implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 14(4):501–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degidi M, Iezzi G, Scarano A, Piattelli A. 2008. Immediately loaded titanium implant with a tissue-stabilizing/maintaining design ('beyond platform switch') retrieved from man after 4 weeks: a histological and histomorphometrical evaluation. A case report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 19(3):276–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. 2004. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 24(6):565–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falco A, Berardini M, Trisi P. 2018. Correlation between implant geometry, implant surface, insertion torque, and primary stability: in vitro biomechanical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 33(4):824–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falisi G, Severino M, Rastelli C, Bernardi S, Caruso S, Galli M, Lamazza L, Di Paolo C. 2017. The effects of surgical preparation techniques and implant macro-geometry on primary stability: an in vitro study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 22(2):e201–e206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrke SA, Mazón P, Del Fabbro M, Tumedei M, Aramburú Júnior J, Pérez-Díaz L, De Aza PN. 2019. Histological and histomorphometric analyses of two bovine bone blocks implanted in Rabbit Calvaria. Symmetry. 11(5):641.
   Google Scholar
• Huwais S, Mazor Z, Ioannou AL, Gluckman H, Neiva R. 2018. A multicenter retrospective clinical study with up-to-5-year follow-up utilizing a method that enhances bone density and allows for transcrestal sinus augmentation through compaction grafting. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 33(6):1305–1311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huwais S, Meyer EG. 2017. A novel osseous densification approach in implant osteotomy preparation to increase biomechanical primary stability, bone mineral density, and bone-to-implant contact. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 32(1):27–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iezzi G, Degidi M, Scarano A, Perrotti V, Piattelli A. 2005. Bone response to submerged, unloaded implants inserted in poor bone sites: a histological and histomorphometrical study of 8 titanium implants retrieved from man. J Oral Implantol. 31(5):225–233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Javed F, Romanos GE. 2010. The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review. J Dent. 38(8):612–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malchiodi L, Scarano A, Quaranta M, Piattelli A. 1998. Rigid fixation by means of titanium mesh in edentulous ridge expansion for horizontal ridge augmentation in the maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 13(5):701–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza-Azpur G, de la Fuente A, Chavez E, Valdivia E, Khouly I. 2019. Horizontal ridge augmentation with guided bone regeneration using particulate xenogenic bone substitutes with or without autogenous block grafts: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 21(4):521–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möhlhenrich SC, Heussen N, Elvers D, Steiner T, Hölzle F, Modabber A. 2015. Compensating for poor primary implant stability in different bone densities by varying implant geometry: a laboratory study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 44(12):1514–1520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olate S, Lyrio MCN, de Moraes M, Mazzonetto R, Moreira RWF. 2010. Influence of diameter and length of implant on early dental implant failure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 68(2):414–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piattelli A, Pontes AEF, Degidi M, Iezzi G. 2011. Histologic studies on osseointegration: soft tissues response to implant surfaces and components. A review. Dent Mater. 27(1):53–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pjetursson BE, Asgeirsson AG, Zwahlen M, Sailer I. 2014. Improvements in implant dentistry over the last decade: comparison of survival and complication rates in older and newer publications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 29(Suppl):308–324.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scarano A, Carinci F, Assenza B, Piattelli M, Murmura G, Piattelli A. 2011. Vertical ridge augmentation of atrophic posterior mandible using an inlay technique with a xenograft without miniscrews and miniplates: case series. Clin Oral Implants Res. 22(10):1125–1130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarano A, Carinci F, Lorusso F, Festa F, Bevilacqua L, Santos de Oliveira P, Maglione M. 2018. Ultrasonic vs drill implant site preparation: post-operative pain measurement through VAS, swelling and crestal bone remodeling: a randomized clinical study. Materials (Basel). 11(12):2516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarano A, Crocetta E, Quaranta A, Lorusso F. 2018. Influence of the thermal treatment to address a better osseointegration of Ti6Al4V dental implants: histological and histomorphometrical study in a rabbit model. Biomed Res Int. 2018:1–1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarano A, Degidi M, Iezzi G, Petrone G, Piattelli A. 2006. Correlation between implant stability quotient and bone-implant contact: a retrospective histological and histomorphometrical study of seven titanium implants retrieved from humans. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 8(4):218–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarano A, Lorusso F, Noumbissi S. 2020. Infrared thermographic evaluation of temperature modifications induced during implant site preparation with steel vs. zirconia implant drill. JCM. 9(1):148.
   Google Scholar
• Trisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, Podaliri Vulpiani M. 2016. New osseodensification implant site preparation method to increase bone density in low-density bone: in vivo evaluation in sheep. Implant Dent. 25(1):24–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumedei M, Piattelli A, Degidi M, Mangano C, Iezzi G. 2020. A narrative review of the histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of the peri-implant bone in loaded and unloaded dental implants. A 30-year experience (1988–2018). IJERPH. 17(6):2088–2106.
   Google Scholar
• Tumedei M, Savadori P, D, Fabbro M. 2019. Synthetic blocks for bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 20(17):4221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Weijden F, Dell'Acqua F, Slot DE. 2009. Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 36(12):1048–1058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zizzari VL, Berardi D, Congedi F, Tumedei M, Cataldi A, Perfetti G. 2015. Morphological aspect and iNOS and Bax expression modification in bone tissue around dental implants positioned using piezoelectric bone surgery versus conventional drill technique. J Craniofac Surg. 26(3):741–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar