Stress distribution is susceptible to the angle of the osteotomy in the high oblique sagittal osteotomy (HOSO): biomechanical evaluation using finite element analyses

References

• Agbaje JO, Salem AS, Lambrichts I, Jacobs R, Politis C. 2015. Systematic review of the incidence of inferior alveolar nerve injury in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and the assessment of neurosensory disturbances. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 44(4):447–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almandoz CA. 2011. Clasificación de maloclusiones. Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia; p. 59.
   Google Scholar
• Becelli R, Renzi G, Carboni A, Cerulli G, Gasparini G. 2002. Inferior alveolar nerve impairment after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy: An analysis of spontaneous recovery patterns observed in 60 patients. J Craniofac Surg. 13(2):315–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böckmann R, Meyns J, Dik E, Kessler P. 2014. The modifications of the sagittal ramus split osteotomy: A literature review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2(12):e271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borie E, Orsi IA, Muñoz G, de Souza LG, del Sol M. 2015. Insertion area in the mandible masticatory muscles for use in finite element analyses. Int J Morphol. 33(4):1377–1379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calera A, Gurrola B, Trujillo J, Casasa A. 2016. Caso clínico corrección ortodóncico-quirúrgica de clase III esquelética: avance maxilar, retroceso mandibular y avance de mentón. Revista Española de Ortodoncia. 46:2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Daas M, Dubois G, Bonnet AS, Lipinski P, Rignon-Bret C. 2008. A complete finite element model of a mandibular implant-retained overdenture with two implants: Comparison between rigid and resilient attachment configurations. Med Eng Phys. 30(2):218–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias PF, Gleiser R. 2008. O índice de necessidade de tratamento ortodôntico como um método de avaliação em saúde pública. Rev Dent Press Ortodon Ortop Facial. 13(1):74–81.
   Google Scholar
• Erkmen E, Simşek B, Yücel E, Kurt A. 2005. Three-dimensional finite element analysis used to compare methods of fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: Setback surgery-posterior loading. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 43(2):97–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemerson de Moraes P, Rizzati-Barbosa C, Olate S, Willian R, de Moraes M. 2012. Condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery: A systematic review. Int J Morphol. 30(3):1023–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera-Vizcaíno C, Herrera Vizcaíno MJ, Pelliccioni Monrroy OJ. 2016. Simulación biomecánica de diferentes métodos de fijación ósea con material de osteosíntesis utilizados en la osteotomía modificada de Schlossmann. CIMENICS, 1035–1046. ISBN:978-980-7161-05-3.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera-Vizcaino C, Seifert L, Berdan M, Ghanaati S, Klos M, Landes C, Sader R. 2020. Revision of 116 orthognathic surgery patients operated with the high-oblique split osteotomy. (Submitted)
   Google Scholar
• Kaduk WMH, Podmelle F, Louis PJ. 2012. Revisiting the supraforaminal horizontal oblique osteotomy of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 70(2):421–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kober C, Kannenberg S, Frank B, Al-Hakim G, Parvin A, Landes C, Sader R. 2011. Computer-assisted pre- and postoperative evaluation of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Int J Comput Dent. 14(3):233–241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kober C, Sader R, Thiele H, Bauer HJ, Zeilhofer HF, Hoffmann KH, Horch HH. 2000a. A modular software concept for individual numerical simulation (FEM) of the human mandible. Biomed Tech (Berl). 45(5):119–125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kober C, Sader R, Thiele H, Bauer HJ, Zeilhofer HF, Hoffmann KH, Horch HH. 2000b. Numerical simulation (FEM) of the human mandible: validation of the function of the masticatory muscles. Biomed Tech (Berl). 45 (7–8):199–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuehle R, Berger M, Saure D, Hoffmann J, Seeberger R. 2016. High oblique sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible: assessment of the positions of the mandibular condyles after orthognathic surgery based on cone-beam tomography. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 54(6):638–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landes C, Tran A, Ballon A, Santo G, Schübel F, Sader R. 2014. Low to high oblique ramus piezoosteotomy: A pilot study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 42(6):901–909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loboa G, Beaupré S, Carter R. 2001. Mechanobiology of initial pseudarthrosis formation with oblique fractures. J Orthop Res. 19(6):1067–1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möhlhenrich SC, Kamal M, Peters F, Fritz U, Hölzle F, Modabber A. 2016. Bony contact area and displacement of the temporomandibular joint after high-oblique and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: A computer-simulated comparison. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 54(3):306–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monson LA. 2013. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Semin Plast Surg. 27(3):145–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MyMiniFactory. 2020. Guaranteed free and paid 3D printable files and designs. [accessed 2020 Apr 21]. https://www.myminifactory.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Obwegeser HL. 2011. Mandibular growth anomalies. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Oguz Y, Uckan S, Ozden AU, Uckan E, Eser A. 2009. Stability of locking and conventional 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 108(2):174–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quevedo Rojas LA. 2004. Osteotomía sagital de rama mandibular en cirugía ortognática. Rev Esp Cirug Oral y Maxilofac. 26(1):14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Radi Londoño J. 1994. Evolución de las Osteotomías Mandibulares para el Tratamiento del Prognastismo y Retrognatismo. Revista Facultad de Odontología U de A. 5(2):11–21.
   Google Scholar
• Seeberger R, Thiele OC, Mertens C, Hoffmann J, Engel M. 2013. Proximal segment positioning with high oblique sagittal split osteotomy: Indications and limits of intraoperative mobile cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 115(6):731–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa CS, Turrini T. 2012. Complications in orthognathic surgery: A comprehensive review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol. 24(2):67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Stringhini DJ, Sommerfeld R, Uetanabaro LC, Leonardi DP, Araújo MR, Rebellato NLB, Costa D. J d, Scariot R. 2016. Resistance and stress finite element analysis of different types of fixation for mandibular orthognathic surgery. Braz Dent J. 27(3):284–291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ugalde FJ. 2007. Clasificación de la maloclusión en los planos anteroposterior, vertical y transversal. Revista ADM. 64(5):97–109.
   Google Scholar
• Verweij J. 2013. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: risk factors for complications and predictability of the splitter-separator technique. J Chem Inf Model. 53:1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar