The impact of calcification patterns in transcatheter aortic valve performance: a fluid-structure interaction analysis

References

• Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Evangelista A, Griffin BP, Iung B, Otto CM, Pellikka PA, Quiñones M. 2009. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 22(1):1–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson DJ. 1992. Computational methods in Lagrangian and Eulerian hydrocodes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 99(2-3):235–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao K, Sucosky P. 2017. Computational comparison of regional stress and deformation characteristics in tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valve leaflets. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Engng. 33(3):e02798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck MR, Boon NA, Newby DE. 2012. Calcific aortic stenosis: a disease of the valve and the myocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 60(19):1854–1863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finotello A, Morganti S, Auricchio F. 2017. Finite element analysis of TAVI: impact of native aortic root computational modeling strategies on simulation outcomes. Med Eng Phys. 47:2–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher CI, Chen J, Merryman WD. 2013. Calcific nodule morphogenesis by heart valve interstitial cells is strain dependent. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 12(1):5–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh RP, Marom G, Bianchi M, D’souza K, Zietak W, Bluestein D. 2020. Numerical evaluation of transcatheter aortic valve performance during heart beating and its post-deployment fluid–structure interaction analysis. Biomech Model Mechanobiol.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh RP, Marom G, Rotman OM, Slepian MJ, Prabhakar S, Horner M, Bluestein D. 2018. Comparative Fluid–Structure Interaction Analysis of Polymeric Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valves’ Hemodynamics and Structural Mechanics. J Biomech Eng. 140(12):121002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halevi R, Hamdan A, Marom G, Mega M, Raanani E, Haj-Ali R. 2015. Progressive aortic valve calcification: three-dimensional visualization and biomechanical analysis. J Biomech. 48(3):489–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson NC, Leipsic J, Pugliese F, Andersen HR, Rossi A, Simonato M, Jensen KT, Christiansen EH, Terkelsen CJ, Blanke P, et al. 2018. Aortic valve and left ventricular outflow tract calcium volume and distribution in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: influence on the risk of significant paravalvular regurgitation. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 12(4):290–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandail HS, Trivedi SD, Shaikh AC, Bajwa TK, O’Hair DP, Jahangir A, LaDisa JF. 2018. Impact of annular and supra-annular CoreValve deployment locations on aortic and coronary artery hemodynamics. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 86:131–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Genereux P, Piazza N, Van Mieghem NM, Blackstone EH, Brott TG, Cohen DJ, Cutlip DE, van Es GA, et al. 2012. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document (VARC-2). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 42(5):S45–S60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalique OK, Hahn RT, Gada H, Nazif TM, Vahl TP, George I, Kalesan B, Forster M, Williams MB, Leon MB, et al. 2014. Quantity and location of aortic valve complex calcification predicts severity and location of paravalvular regurgitation and frequency of post-dilation after balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 7(8):885–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnaswamy A, Tuzcu EM. 2015. Predicting paravalvular leak after balloon-expandable TAVR. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 86(1):152–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luraghi G, Migliavacca F, Chiastra C, Rossi A, Reimers B, Stefanini GG, Rodriguez Matas JF. 2019. Does clinical data quality affect fluid-structure interaction simulations of patient-specific stenotic aortic valve models? J Biomech. 94:202–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luraghi G, Migliavacca F, García-González A, Chiastra C, Rossi A, Cao D, Stefanini G, Rodriguez Matas JF. 2019. On the modeling of patient-specific transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a fluid-structure interaction approach. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 10(3):437–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luraghi G, Migliavacca F, Rodriguez Matas JF. 2018. Study on the accuracy of structural and FSI heart valves simulations. Cardiovasc Eng Tech. 9(4):723–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luraghi G, Wu W, De Gaetano F, Rodriguez Matas JF, Moggridge GD, Serrani M, Stasiak J, Costantino ML, Migliavacca F. 2017. Evaluation of an aortic valve prosthesis: fluid-structure interaction or structural simulation? J Biomech. 58:45–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nappi F, Mazzocchi L, Avtaar Singh S, Morganti S, Sablayrolles J, Acar C, Auricchio F. 2018. Complementary role of the computed biomodelling through finite element analysis and computed tomography for diagnosis of transcatheter heart valve thrombosis. Biomed Res Int. 2018:1346308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasta S, Cannata S, Gentile G, Di Giuseppe M, Cosentino F, Pasta F, Agnese V, Bellavia D, Raffa GM, Pilato M, et al. 2020. Simulation study of transcatheter heart valve implantation in patients with stenotic bicuspid aortic valve. Med Biol Eng Comput. 58(4):815–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawade TA, Newby DE, Dweck MR. 2015. Calcification in aortic stenosis: the skeleton key. J Am Coll Cardiol. 66(5):561–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raggi P. 2014. Paravalvular regurgitation and post-deployment balloon dilation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: can we predict and prevent? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 7(8):895–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russ C, Hopf R, Hirsch S, Sundermann S, Falk V, Szekely G, Gessat M. 2013. Simulation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation under consideration of leaflet calcification. 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 711–714.
   Google Scholar
• Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG, Fontana GP, Makkar RR, et al. 2011. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 364(23):2187–2198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturla F, Ronzoni M, Vitali M, Dimasi A, Vismara R, Preston-Maher G, Burriesci G, Votta E, Redaelli A. 2016. Impact of different aortic valve calcification patterns on the outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a finite element study. J Biomech. 49(12):2520–2530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thubrikar MJ, Aouad J, Nolan SP. 1986. Patterns of calcific deposits in operatively excised stenotic or purely regurgitant aortic valves and their relation to mechanical stress. Am J Cardiol. 58(3):304–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Kodali S, Primiano C, Sun W. 2015. Simulations of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: implications for aortic root rupture. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 14(1):29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W, Pott D, Mazza B, Sironi T, Dordoni E, Chiastra C, Petrini L, Pennati G, Dubini G, Steinseifer U, et al. 2016. Fluid-structure interaction model of a percutaneous aortic valve: comparison with an in vitro test and feasibility study in a patient-specific case. Ann Biomed Eng. 44(2):590–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar