Oxygen transport in a permeable model of abdominal aortic aneurysm

References

• Adolph R, Vorp DA, Steed DL, Webster MW, Kameneva MV, Watkins SC. 1997. Cellular content and permeability of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 25(5):916–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal S, Qamar A, Sharma V, Sharma A. 2011. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: a comprehensive review. Exp Clin Cardiol. 16(1):11–15. eng.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ameenuddin M, Anand M. 2020. A mixture theory model for blood combined with low-density lipoprotein transport to predict early atherosclerosis regions in idealized and patient-derived abdominal aorta. J Biomech Eng. 142(10):101008 (13 pages).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayyalasomayajula A, Vande Geest JP, Simon BR. 2010. Porohyperelastic finite element modeling of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech Eng. 132(10):104502eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, Das SR, On behalf of the American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee, et al. 2019. Heart disease and stroke Statistics-2019 update a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 139(10):e56–e528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budwig R, Elger D, Hooper H, Slippy J. 1993. Steady flow in abdominal aortic aneurysm models. J Biomech Eng. 115(4A):418–423.
   Google Scholar
• Buerk DG, Goldstick TK. 1982. Arterial wall oxygen consumption rate varies spatially. Am J Physiol. 243(6):H948–H958.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buerk DG, Goldstick TK. 1986. Oxygen tension changes in the outer vascular wall supplied by vasa vasorum following adenosine and epinephrine. Blood Vessels. 23(1):9–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caputo M, Chiastra C, Cianciolo C, Cutri E, Dubini G, Gunn J, Keller B, Migliavacca F, Zunino P. 2013. Simulation of oxygen transfer in stented arteries and correlation with in-stent restenosis. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 29(12):1373–1387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coakley MF, Hurt DE, Weber N, Mtingwa M, Fincher EC, Alekseyev V, Chen DT, Yun A, Gizaw M, Swan J, et al. 2014. The NIH 3D print exchange: a public resource for bioscientific and biomedical 3D prints. 3D Print Addit Manuf. 1(3):137–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farsad M, Zambrano BA, Baek S. 2015. Data-guided growth and remodeling model of abdominal aortic aneurysm accounting for the bio-chemical effects of intraluminal thrombus. Computational biomechanics for medicine. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; p. 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser KH, Meagher S, Blake JR, Easson WJ, Hoskins PR. 2008. Characterization of an abdominal aortic velocity waveform in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ultrasound Med Biol. 34(1):73–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geest JPV, Wang DH, Wisniewski SR, Makaroun MS, Vorp DA. 2006. Towards a noninvasive method for determination of patient-specific wall strength distribution in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng. 34(7):1098–1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grøndal N, Søgaard R, Lindholt JS. 2015. Baseline prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm, peripheral arterial disease and hypertension in men aged 65-74 years from a population screening study (VIVA trial). ).Br J Surg. 102(8):902–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannetti L, D'Urso G, Conoscenti G, Cutri E, Tuan RS, Raimondi MT, Gottardi R, Zunino P. 2016. Distributed and lumped parameter models for the characterization of high throughput bioreactors. PloS One. 11(9):e0162774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmerling EMC, Peattie RA. 2018. Abdominal aortic aneurysm pathomechanics: current understanding and future directions. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1097:157–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolandavel MK, Fruend ET, Ringgaard S, Walker PG. 2006. The effects of time varying curvature on species transport in coronary arteries. Ann Biomed Eng. 34(12):1820–1832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshiba N, Ando J, Chen X, Hisada T. 2007. Multiphysics simulation of blood flow and LDL transport in a porohyperelastic arterial wall model. J Biomech Eng. 129(3):374–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuivaniemi H, Ryer EJ, Elmore JR, Tromp G. 2015. Understanding the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 13(9):975–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Fan Y, Deng X, Zhan F. 2011. Effect of non-Newtonian and pulsatile blood flow on mass transport in the human aorta. J Biomech. 44(6):1123–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma P, Li X, Ku DN. 1994. Heat and mass transfer in a separated flow region for high Prandtl and Schmidt numbers under pulsatile conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 37(17):2723–2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll FL, Powell JT, Fraedrich G, Verzini F, Haulon S, Waltham M, van Herwaarden JA, Holt PJE, van Keulen JW, Rantner B, et al. 2011. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 41:S1–S58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore JA, Ethier CR. 1997. Oxygen mass transfer calculations in large arteries. J Biomech Eng. 119(4):469–475. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver‐Williams C, Sweeting M, Turton G, Parkin D, Cooper D, Rodd C, Thompson S, Earnshaw J, Gloucestershire, Programme SAAAS. 2018. Lessons learned about prevalence and growth rates of abdominal aortic aneurysms from a 25‐year ultrasound population screening programme. Br J Surg. 105(1):68–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perktold K, Prosi M, Zunino P. 2009. Mathematical models of mass transfer in the vascular walls. In: Formaggia L, Quarteroni A, Veneziani A, editors. Cardiovascular mathematics: modeling and simulation of the circulatory system. Milano: Springer Milan; p. 243–278.
   Google Scholar
• Polzer S, Gasser TC, Markert B, Bursa J, Skacel P. 2012. Impact of poroelasticity of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Biomed Eng Online. 11:62–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappitsch G, Perktold K. 1996. Computer simulation of convective diffusion processes in large arteries. J Biomech. 29(2):207–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raptis A, Xenos M, Dimas S, Giannoukas A, Labropoulos N, Bluestein D, Matsagkas MI. 2016. Effect of macroscale formation of intraluminal thrombus on blood flow in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 19(1):84–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakalihasan N, Michel J-B, Katsargyris A, Kuivaniemi H, Defraigne J-O, Nchimi A, Powell JT, Yoshimura K, Hultgren R. 2018. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 4(1):1–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salman HE, Ramazanli B, Yavuz MM, Yalcin HC. 2019. Biomechanical investigation of disturbed hemodynamics-induced tissue degeneration in abdominal aortic aneurysms using computational and experimental techniques. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 7:111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schermerhorn M. 2009. A 66-year-old man with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: review of screening and treatment. JAMA. 302(18):2015–2022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin I-S, Kim J-M, Kim KL, Jang SY, Jeon E-S, Choi SH, Kim D-K, Suh W, Kim Y-W. 2009. Early growth response factor-1 is associated with intraluminal thrombus formation in human abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Am Coll Cardiol. 53(9):792–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon BR, Gaballa MA. 1988. Finite Strain, Poroelastic Finite Element Models for Large Arterial Cross Sections. Comput Methods Bioeng. 9:325–334.
   Google Scholar
• Sonesson B, Länne T, Hansen F, Sandgren T. 1994. Infrarenal aortic diameter in the healthy person. European Journal of Vascular Surgery. 8(1):89–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun N, Leung JH, Wood NB, Hughes AD, Thom SA, Cheshire NJ, Xu XY. 2009. Computational analysis of oxygen transport in a patient-specific model of abdominal aortic aneurysm with intraluminal thrombus. Br J Radiol. 82 Spec No 1Spec No 1:S18–S23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedenborg J, Mäyränpää MI, Kovanen PT. 2011. Mast cells: important players in the orchestrated pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 31(4):734–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tada S, Tarbell JM. 2001. Fenestral pore size in the internal elastic lamina affects transmural flow distribution in the artery wall. Ann Biomed Eng. 29(6):456–466. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takayama T, Yamanouchi D. 2013. Aneurysmal disease: the abdominal aorta. Surg Clin North Am. 93(4):877–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virag L, Wilson JS, Humphrey JD, Karsaj I. 2015. A computational model of biochemomechanical effects of intraluminal thrombus on the enlargement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng. 43(12):2852–2867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorp DA. 2007. Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech. 40(9):1887–1902. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorp DA, Lee PC, Wang DH, Makaroun MS, Nemoto EM, Ogawa S, Webster MW. 2001. Association of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysm with local hypoxia and wall weakening. J Vasc Surg. 34(2):291–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorp D, Mandarino W, Webster M, Gorcsan IIJ. 1996. Potential influence of intraluminal thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm as assessed by a new non-invasive method. Cardiovascular Surgery. 4(6):732–739.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vorp D, Wang D, Webster M, Federspiel W. 1998. Effect of intraluminal thrombus thickness and bulge diameter on the oxygen diffusion in abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech Eng. 120(5):579–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang DH, Makaroun MS, Webster MW, Vorp DA. 2002. Effect of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress in patient-specific models of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 36(3):598–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wufsus A, Macera N, Neeves K. 2013. The hydraulic permeability of blood clots as a function of fibrin and platelet density. Biophys J. 104(8):1812–1823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakerzadeh R, Bukac M, Zunino P. 2016. Computational analysis of energy distribution of coupled blood flow and arterial deformation. Int J Adv Eng Sci Appl Math. 8(1):70–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakerzadeh R, Zunino P. 2016. Numerical modeling of fluid-porous structure interaction in arteries.
   Google Scholar
• Zakerzadeh R, Zunino P. 2019. A computational framework for fluid–porous structure interaction with large structural deformation. Meccanica. 54(1-2):101–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar