General method for automated feature extraction and selection and its application for gender classification and biomechanical knowledge discovery of sex differences in spinal posture during stance and gait

References

• Adadi A, Berrada M. 2018. Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access. 6:52138–52160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afef BB, Limam M. 2018. Ensemble feature selection for high dimensional data: a new method and a comparative study. Adv Data Anal Classif. 12(4):937–952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo F, Lucas R, Alegrete N, Azevedo A, Barros H. 2014. Sagittal standing posture, back pain, and quality of life among adults from the general population: a sex-specific association. Spine (Phila PA 1976). 39(13):E782–E794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagheri R, Ebrahimi Takamjani I, Dadgoo M, Ahmadi A, Sarrafzadeh J, Pourahmadi MR, Jafarpisheh AS. 2018. Gender-related differences in reliability of thorax, lumbar, and pelvis kinematics during gait in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. Ann Rehabil Med. 42(2):239–249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bailey A. 2009. Risk factors for low back pain in women: still more questions to be answered. Menopause. 16(1):3–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennasar M, Hicks Y, Setchi R. 2015. Feature selection using joint mutual information maximisation. Expert Syst Appl. 42(22):8520–8532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betsch M, Wild M, Johnstone B, Jungbluth P, Hakimi M, Kuhlmann B, Rapp W. 2013. Evaluation of a novel spine and surface topography system for dynamic spinal curvature analysis during gait. PloS One. 8(7):e70581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz U, Huthwelker J, Konradi J, Schmidtmann I, Bodem F, Heil J, Drees P. 2017. First results of spinal segment-related motion analysis in human gait using rasterstereography. Gait Posture. 57(Suppl.t 1):345–346.
   Google Scholar
• Betz U, Konradi J, Huthwelker J, Wolf C, Diers H, Heitmann K, Westphal R, Drees P. 2018. Quantitative and qualitative parameters to characterize segmental spine movement during gait. World Congress of Biomechanics; July 8–12; Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Bolón-Canedo V, Alonso-Betanzos A. 2019. Ensembles for feature selection: a review and future trends. Inf Fusion. 52:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolón-Canedo V, Sánchez-Maroño N, Alonso-Betanzos A. 2013. A review of feature selection methods on synthetic data. Knowl Inf Syst. 34(3):483–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn. 45(1):5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruening DA, Frimenko RE, Goodyear CD, Bowden DR, Fullenkamp AM. 2015. Sex differences in whole body gait kinematics at preferred speeds. Gait Posture. 41(2):540–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bzdok D, Altman N, Krzywinski M. 2018. Statistics versus machine learning. Nat Methods. 15(4):233–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrashekar G, Sahin F. 2014. A survey on feature selection methods. Comput Electr Eng. 40(1):16–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, Kegelmeyer WP. 2002. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res. 16:321–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho SH, Park JM, Kwon OY. 2004. Gender differences in three dimensional gait analysis data from 98 healthy Korean adults. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 19(2):145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chockalingam N, Dangerfield PH, Giakas G, Cochrane T. 2002. Study of marker placements in the back for opto-electronic motion analysis. Stud Health Technol Inform. 88:105–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chumanov ES, Wall-Scheffler C, Heiderscheit BC. 2008. Gender differences in walking and running on level and inclined surfaces. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 23(10):1260–1268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosbie J, Vachalathiti R, Smith R. 1997. Age, gender and speed effects on spinal kinematics during walking. Gait Posture. 5(1):13–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreischarf M, Albiol L, Rohlmann A, Pries E, Bashkuev M, Zander T, Duda G, Druschel C, Strube P, Putzier M, et al. 2014. Age-related loss of lumbar spinal lordosis and mobility–a study of 323 asymptomatic volunteers. PLoS One. 9(12):e116186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvorak J, Vajda EG, Grob D, Panjabi MM. 1995. Normal motion of the lumbar spine as related to age and gender. Eur Spine J. 4(1):18–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Endo K, Suzuki H, Nishimura H, Tanaka H, Shishido T, Yamamoto K. 2012. Sagittal lumbar and pelvic alignment in the standing and sitting positions. J Orthopaed Sci. 17(6):682–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feature Labs I. 2019. Featuretools: automated feature engineering. [accessed 2020 Feb 05]. https://www.featuretools.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Fillingim RB, King CD, Ribeiro-Dasilva MC, Rahim-Williams B, Riley JL. 2009. Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings. J Pain. 10(5):447–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genuer R, Poggi J-M, Tuleau-Malot C. 2010. Variable selection using random forests. Pattern Recogn Lett. 31(14):2225–2236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gipsman A, Rauschert L, Daneshvar M, Knott P. 2014. Evaluating the reproducibility of motion analysis scanning of the spine during walking. Adv Med. 2014:721829
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goutier KM, Jansen SL, Horlings CG, Kung UM, Allum JH. 2010. The influence of walking speed and gender on trunk sway for the healthy young and older adults. Age Ageing. 39(5):647–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregersen GG, Lucas DB. 1967. An in vivo study of the axial rotation of the human thoracolumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg. 49(2):247–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm J. 2016. Etablierung und Evaluation eines neuartigen lichtoptischen Messsystems zur Untersuchung der Haltung des Beckens und der Wirbelsäule unter dynamischen Bedingungen [dissertation]. Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.
   Google Scholar
• Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME. 1990. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthop Res. 8(3):383–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalousis A, Prados J, Hilario M. 2007. Stability of feature selection algorithms: a study on high-dimensional spaces. Knowl Inf Syst. 12(1):95–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinel E, D’Amico M, Roncoletta P. 2018. Normative 3D opto-electronic stereo-photogrammetric sagittal alignment parameters in a young healthy adult population. PLoS One. 13(9):e0203679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko SU, Tolea MI, Hausdorff JM, Ferrucci L. 2011. Sex-specific differences in gait patterns of healthy older adults: Results from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Biomech. 44(10):1974–1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Yu L. 2005. Toward integrating feature selection algorithms for classification and clustering. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 17:491–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan M, Huynh L. 2019. Sex differences in the spine. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 7(3):246–252.
   Google Scholar
• Mohokum M, Schulein S, Skwara A. 2015. The validity of rasterstereography: a systematic review. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 7(3):5899–5873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham R, Naemi R, Healy A, Chockalingam N. 2016. Multi-segment kinematic model to assess three-dimensional movement of the spine and back during gait. Prosthet Orthot Int. 40(5):624–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemitz C. 2010. The evolution of the upright posture and gait - a review and a new synthesis. Naturwissenschaften. 97(3):241–263.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pes B. 2019. Ensemble feature selection for high-dimensional data: a stability analysis across multiple domains. Neural Comput Appl. 3:1157.
   Google Scholar
• Phinyomark A, Petri G, Ibáñez-Marcelo E, Osis ST, Ferber R. 2018. Analysis of big data in gait biomechanics: current trends and future directions. J Med Biol Eng. 38(2):244–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt D, Cartmill M, Griffin TM, Hanna JB, Lemelin P. 2006. Adaptive value of ambling gaits in primates and other mammals. J Exp Biol. 209(Pt 11):2042–2049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröder J, Stiller T, Mattes K. 2011. Referenzdaten in der Wirbelsäulenformanalyse. Manuelle Medizin. 49(3):161–166.
   Google Scholar
• Seijo-Pardo B, Bolón-Canedo V, Alonso-Betanzos A. 2019. On developing an automatic threshold applied to feature selection ensembles. Inf Fusion. 45:227–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seijo-Pardo B, Porto-Díaz I, Bolón-Canedo V, Alonso-Betanzos A. 2017. Ensemble feature selection: homogeneous and heterogeneous approaches. Knowl Based Syst. 118:124–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahrjooihaghighi A, Frigui H, Zhang X, Wei X, Shi B, Trabelsi A2. 2017. An ensemble feature selection method for biomarker discovery. Proc IEEE Int Symp Signal Proc Inf Tech. 2017:416–421.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith LK, Lelas JL, Kerrigan DC. 2002. Gender differences in pelvic motions and center of mass displacement during walking: stereotypes quantified. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 11(5):453–458.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stokes VP, Andersson C, Forssberg H. 1989. Rotational and translational movement features of the pelvis and thorax during adult human locomotion. J Biomech. 22(1):43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang J, Alelyani S, Liu H. 2014. Feature selection for classification: a review. In: Aggarwal CC, editor. Data classification: algorithms and applications. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC; p. 37–64.
   Google Scholar
• Teufl W, Taetz B, Miezal M, Lorenz M, Pietschmann J, Jöllenbeck T, Fröhlich M, Bleser G. 2019. Towards an inertial sensor-based wearable feedback system for patients after total hip arthroplasty: validity and applicability for gait classification with gait kinematics-based features. Sensors. 19(22):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victo Sudha George G, Cyril Raj V. 2015. Accurate and stable feature selection powered by iterative backward selection and cumulative ranking score of features. Indian J Sci Technol. 8(11):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Xu J, Zhao C, Peng Y, Wang H. 2019. An ensemble feature selection method for high-dimensional data based on sort aggregation. Syst Sci Control Eng. 7(2):32–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar