Comparison of dynamic response of three TLIF techniques on the fused and adjacent segments under vibration

References

• Ambati DV, Wright EK, Lehman RA, Kang DG, Wagner SC, Dmitriev AE. 2015. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study. Spine J. 15(8):1812–1822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beutler WJ, Peppelman WC. 2003. Anterior lumbar fusion with paired BAK standard and paired BAK proximity cages: subsidence incidence, subsidence factors, and clinical outcome. Spine J. 3(4):289–293.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bovenzi M, Schust M, Mauro M. 2017. An overview of low back pain and occupational exposures to whole-body vibration and mechanical shocks. Med Lav. 108(6):419–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovenzi M, Schust M, Menzel G, Prodi A, Mauro M. 2015. Relationships of low back outcomes to internal spinal load: a prospective cohort study of professional drivers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 88 (4):487–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burström L, Nilsson T, Wahlström J. 2015. Whole-body vibration and the risk of low back pain and sciatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 88(4):403–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bylski-Austrow DI, Glos DL, Wall EJ, Crawford AH. 2018. Scoliosis vertebral growth plate histomorphometry: comparisons to controls, growth rates, and compressive stresses. J Orthop Res. 36(9):2450–2459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bylski-Austrow DI, Wall EJ, Rupert MP, Roy DR, Crawford AH. 2001. Growth plate forces in the adolescent human knee: a radiographic and mechanical study of epiphyseal staples. J Pediatr Orthop. 21(6):817–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatham LS, Patel VV, Yakacki CM, Carpenter RD. 2017. Interbody spacer material properties and design conformity for reducing subsidence during lumbar interbody fusion. J Biomech. Eng. 139:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CS, Cheng CK, Liu CL. 2002. A biomechanical comparison of posterolateral fusion and posterior fusion in the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 15(1):53–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen F, Gatea S, Ou H, Lu B, Long H. 2016. Fracture characteristics of PEEK at various stress triaxialities. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 64:173–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung KMC, Karppinen J, Chan D, Ho DWH, Song YQ, Sham P, Cheah KSE, Leong JCY, Luk KDK. 2009. Prevalence and pattern of lumbar magnetic resonance imaging changes in a population studyof one thousand forty-three individuals. Spine. 34(9):934–940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang MF, Zhong ZC, Chen CS, Cheng CK, Shih SL. 2006. Biomechanical comparison of instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion with one or two cages by finite element analysis. Spine. 31(19):E682–E689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho W, Wu C, Mehbod AA, Transfeldt EE. 2008. Comparison of cage designs for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 23(8):979–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole CD, McCall TD, Schmidt MH, Dailey AT. 2009. Comparison of low back fusion techniques: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2(2):118–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corniola MV, Jagersberg M, Stienen MN, Gautschi OP. 2015. Complete cage migration/subsidence into the adjacent vertebral body after posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Clin Neurosci. 22(3):597–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickerson DA, Sander EA, Nauman EA. 2008. Modeling the mechanical consequences of vibratory loading in the vertebral body: microscale effects. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 7(3):191–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drain O, Lenoir T, Dauzac C, Rillardon L, Guigui P. 2008. [Influence of disc height on outcome of posterolateral fusion]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 94(5):472–480.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dreischarf M, Zander T, Shirazi-Adl A, Puttlitz CM, Adam CJ, Chen CS, Goel VK, Kiapour A, Kim YH, Labus KM, et al. 2014. Comparison of eight published static finite element models of the intact lumbar spine: predictive power of models improves when combined together. J Biomech. 47(8):1757–1766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faizan A, Kiapour A, Kiapour AM, Goel VK. 2014. Biomechanical analysis of various footprints of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion devices. J Spinal Disord Tech. 27(4):E118–E127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fan W, Guo LX. 2018. Finite element investigation of the effect of nucleus removal on vibration characteristics of the lumbar spine under a compressive follower preload. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 78:342–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan W, Guo LX. 2019. Biomechanical comparison of the effects of anterior, posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on vibration characteristics of the human lumbar spine. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 22(5):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbusera F, Fantigrossi A, Raimondi MT, Assietti R, Sassi M, Fornari M. 2006. Biomechanics of the c5-c6 spinal unit before and after placement of a disc prosthesis. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 5(4):253–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel VK, Mehta A, Jangra J, Faizan A, Kiapour A, Hoy RW, Fauth AR. 2007. Anatomic facet replacement system (AFRS) restoration of lumbar segment mechanics to intact: A finite element study and in vitro cadaver investigation. SAS J. 1(1):46–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goel VK, Park H, Kong WZ. 1994. Investigation of vibration characteristics of the ligamentous lumbar spine using the finite element approach. J Biomech Eng. 116(4):377–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo LX, Li WJ. 2020. Finite element modeling and static/dynamic validation of thoracolumbar-pelvic segment. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 23(2):69–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo LX, Wang ZW, Zhang YM, Lee KK, Teo EC, Li H, Wen BC. 2009. Material property sensitivity analysis on resonant frequency characteristics of the human spine. J Appl Biomech. 25(1):64–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson TH, Keller TS, Spengler DM. 1987. Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar spine. II. Fatigue strength during dynamic compressive loading. J Orthop Res. 5(4):479–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms JG, Jeszenszky D. 1998. The unilateral transforaminal approach forposterior lumbar interbody fusion. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 10(2):90–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hikata T, Kamata M, Furukawa M. 2014. Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after posterior lumbar interbody fusion and efficacy of simultaneous decompression surgery for symptomatic adjacent segment disease. J. Spinal Disord. 27:70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Jost B, Cripton PA, Lund T, Oxland TR, Lippuner K, Jaeger P, Nolte LP. 1998. Compressive strength of interbody cages in the lumbar spine: the effect of cage shape, posterior instrumentation and bone density. Eur Spine J. 7(2):132–141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly N, Harrison NM, Mcdonnell P, Mcgarry JP. 2013. An experimental and computational investigation of the post-yield behaviour of trabecular bone during vertebral device subsidence. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 12(4):685–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettler A, Wilke HJ, Dietl R, Krammer M, Lumenta C, Claes L. 2000. Stabilizing effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages before and after cyclic loading. J Neurosurg. 92(1 Suppl):87–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krammer M, Dietl R, Lumenta CB, Kettler A, Wilke HJ, Büttner A, Claes L. 2001. Resistance of the lumbar spine against axial compression forces after implantation of three different posterior lumbar interbody cages. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 143(12):1217–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D. 2001. Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J. 10(4):314–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazennec J-Y, Ramaré S, Arafati N, Laudet CG, Gorin M, Roger B, Hansen S, Saillant G, Maurs L, Trabelsi R. 2000. Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J. 9(1):47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CW, Yoon KJ, Ha SS. 2017. Which approach is advantageous to preventing development of adjacent segment disease? Comparative analysis of 3 different lumbar interbody fusion techniques (ALIF, LLIF, and PLIF) in L4-5 spondylolisthesis. World Neurosurg. 105:612–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YH, Chung CJ, Wang CW, Peng YT, Chang CH, Chen CH, Chen YN, Li CT. 2016. Computational comparison of three posterior lumbar interbody fusion techniques by using porous titanium interbody cages with 50% porosity. Comput Biol Med. 71:35–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Ma J, Park P, Huang XD, Xie N, Ye XJ. 2017. Biomechanical comparison of multilevel lateral interbody fusion with and without supplementary instrumentation: a three-dimensional finite element study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 18(1):63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu T, Lu Y. 2019. Comparison of the biomechanical performance among PLF, TLIF, XLIF, and OLIF, a finite element analysis. World Neurosurg. 129:e890–e899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcián P, Narra N, Borák L, Chamrad J, Wolff J. 2019. Biomechanical performance of cranial implants with different thicknesses and material properties: a finite element study. Comput Biol Med. 109:43–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palepu V, Peck JH, Simon DD, Helgeson MD, Nagaraja S. 2017. Biomechanical evaluation of an integrated fixation cage during fatigue loading: a human cadaver study. J Neurosurg: Spine. 26(4):524–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Meade KP, Lee B, Dunlap B. 1999. A follower load increases the load – carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression. Spine. 24(10):1003–1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polikeit A, Ferguson SJ, Nolte LP, Orr TE. 2003. Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis. Eur Spine J. 12(4):413–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao RD, David KS, Wang M. 2005. Biomechanical changes at adjacent segments following anterior lumbar interbody fusion using tapered cages. Spine. 30(24):2772–2776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastegar S, Arnoux PJ, Wang X, Aubin CÉ. 2020. Biomechanical analysis of segmental lumbar lordosis and risk of cage subsidence with different cage heights and alternative placements in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 23(9):456–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner SM, Natarajan RN, Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Voronov LI, Guo BY, Andersson GBJ, An HS. 2007. Novel model to analyze the effect of a large compressive follower pre-load on range of motions in a lumbar spine. J Biomech. 40 (6):1326–1332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruberte LM, Natarajan RN, Andersson GBJ. 2009. Influence of single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease on the behavior of the adjacent segments-a finite element model study. J Biomech. 42(3):341–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab FJ, Smith VA, Biserni M, Gamez L, Farcy JP, Pagala M. 2002. Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine. 27(4):387–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidhu GS, Henkelman E, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ, Hilibrand A, Anderson DG, Rihn JA. 2014. Minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 472(6):1792–1799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahata M, Kotani Y, Abumi K. 2005. An investigational study on the healing process of anterior spinal arthrodesis using a bioactive ceramic spacer and the change in load-sharing of spinal instrumentation. Spine. 30:E195–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang S, Rebholz BJ. 2011. Does anterior lumbar interbody fusion promote adjacent degeneration in degenerative disc disease? A finite element study. J Orthop Sci. 16(2):221–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thalheimer E. 1996. Practical approach to measurement and evaluation of exposure to whole-body vibration in the workplace. Semin Perinatol. 20(1):77–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai P, Hsu CC, Chen SY, Wu TH, Huang CC. 2016. Biomechanical investigation into the structural design of porous additive manufactured cages using numerical and experimental approaches. Comput Biol Med. 76:14–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuang YH, Chiang YF, Hung CY, Wei HW, Huang CH, Cheng CK. 2009. Comparison of cage application modality in posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation – A finite element study. Med Eng Phys. 31(5):565–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vokshoor A, Khurana S, Wilson D, Filsinger P. 2014. Clinical and radiographic outcomes after spinous process fixation and posterior fusion in an elderly cohort. Surg Technol Int. 25:271–276.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wahlström J, Burström L, Johnson PW, Nilsson T, Järvholm B. 2018. Exposure to whole-body vibration and hospitalization due to lumbar disc herniation. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 91(6):689–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ST, Goel VK, Fu CY, Kubo S, Choi W, Liu CL, Chen TH. 2005. Posterior instrumentation reduces differences in spine stability as a result of different cage orientations: an in vitro study. Spine. 30(1):62–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinhoffer SL, Guyer RD, Herbert M, Griffith SL. 1995. Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. a cadaveric study. Spine. 20(5):526–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder DG, Woodworth BB, Frymoyer JW, Pope MH. 1982. Vibration and the human spine. Spine. 7(3):243–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu HC, Ya RF. 1976. Mechanical behavior of the human annulus fibrosus. J Biomech. 9(1):1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Ju W, Xu N, Zhang X, Zhu X, Zhu L, Qian X, Wen F, Wu W, Jiang F. 2013. Biomechanical comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with 1 or 2 cages by finite-element analysis. Oper Neurosurg. 73(2):198–205.
   Google Scholar
• Yang SD, Chen Q, Ding WY, Zhao JQ, Zhang YZ, Shen Y, Yang DL. 2016. Unilateral pedicle screw fixation with bone graft vs. bilateral pedicle screw fixation with bone graft or cage: a comparative study. Med Sci Monit. 22:890–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Fogel GR, Liao Z, Sun Y, Liu W. 2018. Biomechanical analysis of lumbar interbody fusion cages with various lordotic angles: a finite element study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 21(3):247–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar