Numerical implementation of an osmo-poro-visco-hyperelastic finite element solver: application to the intervertebral disc

References

• Adams MA, Dolan P. 2012. Intervertebral disc degeneration: Evidence for two distinct phenotypes. J Anat. 221(6):497–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves JL, Yamamura N, Oda T, Teodosiu C. 2010. Numerical simulation of musculo-skeletal systems by V-Biomech. In: Middleton J, Evans S, Holt C, Jacobs C, Atienza C, Walker B, editors. CMBBE2010. Valencia, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Alves JL, Cazacu O. 2015. Correlation between strength differential effects in the plastic flow of the matrix and the rate of damage growth in porous polycrystals. Comptes Rendus Mécanique. 343(2):107–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argoubi M, Shirazi-Adl A. 1996. Poroelastic creep response analysis of a lumbar motion segment in compression. J Biomech. 29(10):1331–1339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros PD, Carvalho PD, Alves JL, Oliveira MC, Menezes LF. 2016. DD3MAT - A code for yield criteria anisotropy parameters identification. J Phys Conf Ser. 734:4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Barthelemy VMP, van Rijsbergen MM, Wilson W, Huyghe JM, van Rietbergen B, Ito K. 2016. A computational spinal motion segment model incorporating a matrix composition-based model of the intervertebral disc. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 54:194–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biot MA. 1941. General Theory of Three‐Dimensional Consolidation. J Appl Phys. 12(2):155–164.
   Google Scholar
• Biot MA. 1972. Theory of finite deformations of porous solids. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 21(7):597–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonet J, Wood RD. 1997. Nonlinear continuum mechanics for finite element analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brink U, Stein E. 1996. On some mixed finite element methods for incompressible and nearly incompressible finite elasticity. Comput Mech. 19(1):105–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broberg KB. 1993. Slow deformation of intervertebral discs. J Biomech. 26(4-5):501–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro APG, Wilson W, Huyghe JM, Ito K, Alves JL. 2014. Intervertebral disc creep behavior assessment through an open source finite element solver. J Biomech. 47(1):297–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro APG, Yao J, Battisti T, Lacroix D. 2018. Poroelastic Modeling of Highly Hydrated Collagen Hydrogels: Experimental Results vs. Numerical Simulation With Custom and Commercial Finite Element Solvers. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 6:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang TYP, Saleeb AF, Li G. 1991. Large strain analysis of rubber-like materials based on a perturbed Lagrangian variational principle. Comput Mech. 8(4):221–233.
   Google Scholar
• Coombs DJ, Rullkoetter PJ, Laz PJ. 2017. Efficient probabilistic finite element analysis of a lumbar motion segment. J Biomech. 61:65–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa MC, Eltes P, Lazary A, Varga PP, Viceconti M, Dall'Ara E. 2019. Biomechanical assessment of vertebrae with lytic metastases with subject-specific finite element models. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 98:268–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberlein R, Holzapfel GA, Frohlich M. 2004. Multi-segment FEA of the human lumbar spine including the heterogeneity of the annulus fibrosus. Comput Mech. 34:147–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlers W, Karajan N, Markert B. 2009. An extended biphasic model for charged hydrated tissues with application to the intervertebral disc. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 8(3):233–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eijkelkamp MF, van Donkelaar CC, Veldhuizen AG, van Horn JR, Huyghe JM, Verkerke GJ. 2001. Requirements for an artificial intervertebral disc. Int J Artif Organs. 24(5):311–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallah A, Ahmadian MT, Firozbakhsh K, Aghdam MM. 2016. Micromechanics and constitutive modeling of connective soft tissues. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 60:157–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan R, Gong H, Qiu S, Zhang X, Fang J, Zhu D. 2015. Effects of resting modes on human lumbar spines with different levels of degenerated intervertebral discs: a finite element investigation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 16:221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson SJ, Ito K, Nolte LP. 2004. Fluid flow and convective transport of solutes within the intervertebral disc. J Biomech. 37(2):213–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freutel M, Schmidt H, Dürselen L, Ignatius A, Galbusera F. 2014. Finite element modeling of soft tissues: material models, tissue interaction and challenges. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 29(4):363–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii K, Yamazaki M, Kang JD, Risbud MV, Cho SK, Qureshi SA, Hecht AC, Iatridis JC. 2019. Discogenic Back pain: literature review of definition, diagnosis, and treatment. JBMR Plus. 3(5):e10180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galbusera F, Bashkuev M, Wilke H-J, Shirazi-Adl A, Schmidt H. 2014. Comparison of various contact algorithms for poroelastic tissues. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 17(12):1323–1334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbusera F, Schmidt H, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Wilke H-J. 2011. The effect of degenerative morphological changes of the intervertebral disc on the lumbar spine biomechanics: a poroelastic finite element investigation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 14(8):729–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbusera F, Schmidt H, Noailly J, Malandrino A, Lacroix D, Wilke HJ, Shirazi-Adl A. 2011. Comparison of four methods to simulate swelling in poroelastic finite element models of intervertebral discs. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 4(7):1234–1241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goins ML, Wimberley DW, Yuan PS, Fitzhenry LN, Vaccaro AR. 2005. Nucleus pulposus replacement: An emerging technology. Spine J. 5:317–324.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer F, Schmitt H, Schmidt H, Claes L, Wilke HJ. 2007. Creep associated changes in intervertebral disc bulging obtained with a laser scanning device. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 22(7):737–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC. 2001. A viscoelastic model for fiber-reinforced composites at finite strains: Continuum basis, computational aspects and applications. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 190(34):4379–4403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzapfel GA, Schulze-Bauer CAJ, Feigl G, Regitnig P. 2005. Single lamellar mechanics of the human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 3(3):125–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huyghe JM, van Campen DH, Arts T, Heethaar RM. 1991. A two-phase finite element model of the diastolic left ventricle. J Biomech. 24(7):527–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huyghe JM. 1986. Non-linear finite element models for the beating left ventricle and the intramyocardial coronary circulation. [place unknown]: Eindhoven University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Iatridis J, Setton L, Weidenbaum M, Mow V. 1997. The viscoelastic behavior of the non-degenerate human lumbar nucleus pulposus in shear. J Biomech. 30(10):1005–1013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaliske M, Nasdala L, Rothert H. 2001. On damage modelling for elastic and viscoelastic materials at large strain. Comput Struct. 79(22-25):2133–2141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kida N, Adachi T. 2014. Finite element formulation and analysis for an arterial wall with residual and active stresses. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 18(11):1143–1159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krag MH, Cohen MC, Haugh LD, Pope MH. 1990. Body Height Change During Upright and Recumbent Posture. Spine (Phila Pa 1976):15(3):202–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Huec JC, Charosky S, Barrey C, Rigal J, Aunoble S. 2011. Sagittal imbalance cascade for simple degenerative spine and consequences: algorithm of decision for appropriate treatment. Eur Spine J. 20(S5):699–703.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maas SA, Ellis BJ, Rawlins DS, Weiss JA. 2016. Finite element simulation of articular contact mechanics with quadratic tetrahedral elements. J Biomech. 49(5):659–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malandrino A, Jackson AR, Huyghe JM, Noailly J. 2015. Poroelastic modeling of the intervertebral disc: A path toward integrated studies of tissue biophysics and organ degeneration. MRS Bull. 40(4):324–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini G, Studer H, Huber G, Püschel K, Ferguson SJ. 2016. Geometrical aspects of patient-specific modelling of the intervertebral disc: collagen fibre orientation and residual stress distribution. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 15(3):543–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masni-AzianTanaka M. 2018. Biomechanical investigation on the influence of the regional material degeneration of an intervertebral disc in a lower lumbar spinal unit: A finite element study. Comput Biol Med. 98:26–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mijuca D. 2004. On hexahedral finite element HC8/27 in elasticity. Comput Mech. 33(6):466–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikkhoo M, Wang JL, Parnianpour M, El-Rich M, Khalaf K. 2018. Biomechanical response of intact, degenerated and repaired intervertebral discs under impact loading – Ex-vivo and In-Silico investigation. J Biomech. 70:26–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden RW, Saccomandi G, Sgura I. 2004. Fitting hyperelastic models to experimental data. Comput Mech. 34(6):484–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oomens CWJ, van Campen DH, Grootenboer HJ. 1987. A mixture approach to the mechanics of skin. J Biomech. 20(9):877–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul CPL, Smit TH, de Graaf M, Holewijn RM, Bisschop A, van de Ven PM, Mullender MG, Helder MN, Strijkers GJ. 2018. Quantitative MRI in early intervertebral disc degeneration: T1rho correlates better than T2 and ADC with biomechanics, histology and matrix content. PLoS One. 13(1):e0191442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce DM, Ricken T, Holzapfel G. a. 2012. A hyperelastic biphasic fibre-reinforced model of articular cartilage considering distributed collagen fibre orientations: continuum basis, computational aspects and applications. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 5842:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Raj PP. 2008. Intervertebral disc: anatomy-physiology-pathophysiology-treatment. Pain Pract. 8(1):18–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Remij EW, Remmers JJC, Huyghe JM, Smeulders DMJ. 2015. The enhanced local pressure model for the accurate analysis of fluid pressure driven fracture in porous materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 286:293–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt H, Bashkuev M, Galbusera F, Wilke H-J, Shirazi-Adl A. 2014. Finite element study of human lumbar disc nucleus replacements. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 17(16):1762–1776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt H, Kettler A, Rohlmann A, Claes L, Wilke HJ. 2007. The risk of disc prolapses with complex loading in different degrees of disc degeneration - A finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 22(9):988–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt H, Reitmaier S, Graichen F, Shirazi-Adl A. 2016. Review of the fluid flow within intervertebral discs - How could in vitro measurements replicate in vivo? J Biomech. 49(14):3133–3146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder Y, Elliott DM, Wilson W, Baaijens FPT, Huyghe JM. 2008. Experimental and model determination of human intervertebral disc osmoviscoelasticity. J Orthop Res. 26(8):1141–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit TH, Odgaard A, Schneider E. 1997. Structure and function of vertebral trabecular bone. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 22:2823–2833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes IA, Chegini S, Ferguson SJ, Gardner-Morse MG, Iatridis JC, Laible JP. 2010. Limitation of finite element analysis of poroelastic behavior of biological tissues undergoing rapid loading. Ann Biomed Eng. 38(5):1780–1788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sussman T, Bathe K-J. 1987. A finite element formulation for nonlinear incompressible elastic and inelastic analysis. Comput Struct. 26(1-2):357–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira De Freitas JA, Moldovan ID, Toma M. 2010. Mixed and hybrid stress elements for biphasic media. Comput Struct. 88(23-24):1286–1299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzaghi K. 1943. Theoretical soil mechanics. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tyrrell AR, Reilly T, Troup JD. 1985. Circadian variation in stature and the effects of spinal loading. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 10:161–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Voet A. 1997. A comparison of finite element codes for the solution of biphasic poroelastic problems. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 211(2):209–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Loon R, Huyghe JM, Wijlaars MW, Baaijens FPT. 2003. 3D FE implementation of an incompressible quadriphasic mixture model. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 57(9):1243–1258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velísková P, Bashkuev M, Shirazi-Adl A, Schmidt H. 2017. Computational study of the role of fluid content and flow on the lumbar disc response in cyclic compression: Replication of in vitro and in vivo conditions. J Biomech. 70:16–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JR, Natarajan RN, Andersson GBJ. 2007. Inclusion of regional poroelastic material properties better predicts biomechanical behavior of lumbar discs subjected to dynamic loading. J Biomech. 40(9):1981–1987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson W, Huyghe JM, van Donkelaar CC. 2006. A composition-based cartilage model for the assessment of compositional changes during cartilage damage and adaptation. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 14(6):554–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson W, Huyghe JM, Van Donkelaar CC. 2007. Depth-dependent compressive equilibrium properties of articular cartilage explained by its composition. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 6(1-2):43–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson W, Van Donkelaar CC, Van Rietbergen B, Huiskes R. 2005. A fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic swelling model for articular cartilage. J Biomech. 38(6):1195–1204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu M, Yang J, Lieberman IH, Haddas R. 2017. Lumbar spine finite element model for healthy subjects: development and validation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 20(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu C, Malakpoor K, Huyghe JM. 2019. A mixed hybrid finite element framework for the simulation of swelling ionized hydrogels. Comput Mech. 63(5):835–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar