A custom-made distal humerus plate fabricated by selective laser melting

References

• Atalar AC, Tunalı O, Erşen A, Kapıcıoğlu M, Sağlam Y, Demirhan MS. 2017. Biomechanical comparison of orthogonal versus parallel double plating systems in intraarticular distal humerus fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 51(1):23–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogataj M, Kosel F, Norris R, Krkovic M, Brojan M. 2015. Biomechanical study of different plate configurations for distal humerus osteosynthesis. Med Biol Eng Comput. 53(5):381–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottlang M, Doornink J, Lujan TJ, Fitzpatrick DC, Marsh JL, Augat P, von Rechenberg B, Lesser M, Madey SM. 2010. Effects of construct stiffness on healing of fractures stabilized with locking plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 92 (Suppl 2):12–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer R, Welsch G, Collings EW. 1994. Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys. ASM International, Materials Park, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Caiti G, Dobbe JGG, Bervoets E, Beerens M, Strackee SD, Strijkers GJ, Streekstra GJ. 2019. Biomechanical considerations in the design of patient-specific fixation plates for the distal radius. Med Biol Eng Comput. 57(5):1099–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coquim J, Clemenzi J, Salahi M, Sherif A, Tavakkoli Avval P, Shah S, Schemitsch EH, Bagheri ZS, Bougherara H, Zdero R. 2018. Biomechanical analysis using FEA and experiments of metal plate and bone strut repair of a femur midshaft segmental defect. Biomed Res Int. 2018:4650308–4650308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunham CE, Takaki SE, Johnson JA, Dunning CE. 2005. Mechanical properties of cancellous bone of the distal humerus. Clin Biomech. 20(8):834–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutwald R, Jaeger R, Lambers FM. 2017. Customized mandibular reconstruction plates improve mechanical performance in a mandibular reconstruction model. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 20(4):426–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herle S, Marcu C, Benea H, Miclea L, Robotin R. 2010. Simulation-based stress analysis for a 3D modeled humerus-prosthesis assembly. In: Sobh T, Elleithy K, editors. Innovations in computing sciences and software engineering. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen J, Carlson J, Zamora R, Voor M. 2018. Biomechanical stability of single vs. double plating of distal humerus fractures in simulated osteoporotic bone. 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT); 6–8 Dec. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Korner J, Lill H, Müller LP, Rommens PM, Schneider E, Linke B. 2003. The LCP-concept in the operative treatment of distal humerus fractures – biological, biomechanical and surgical aspects. Injury. 34:20–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudo T, Hara A, Iwase H, Ichihara S, Nagao M, Maruyama Y, Kaneko K. 2016. Biomechanical properties of orthogonal plate configuration versus parallel plate configuration using the same locking plate system for intra-articular distal humeral fractures under radial or ulnar column axial load. Injury. 47(10):2071–2076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod A, Simpson AHRW, Pankaj P. 2018. Experimental and numerical investigation into the influence of loading conditions in biomechanical testing of locking plate fracture fixation devices. Bone Joint Res. 7(1):111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nauth A, McKee MD, Ristevski B, Hall J, Schemitsch EH. 2011. Distal humeral fractures in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 93(7):686–700.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oura K, Shigi A, Oka K, Tanaka H, Murase T. 2018. Corrective osteotomy for hyperextended elbow with limited flexion due to supracondylar fracture malunion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 27(8):1357–1365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perren SM. 2002. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 84-B(8):1093–1110.
   Google Scholar
• Sabalic S, Kodvanj J, Pavic A. 2013. Comparative study of three models of extra-articular distal humerus fracture osteosynthesis using the finite element method on an osteoporotic computational model. Injury. 44:S56–S61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savvidou OD, Zampeli F, Koutsouradis P, Chloros GD, Kaspiris A, Sourmelis S, Papagelopoulos PJ. 2018. Complications of open reduction and internal fixation of distal humerus fractures. EFORT Open Rev. 3(10):558–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scolaro JA, Hsu JE, Svach DJ, Mehta S. 2014. Plate selection for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures: a biomechanical comparison of three different implants. Injury. 45(12):2040–2044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh D, Rana A, Jhajhria SK, Garg B, Pandey PM, Kalyanasundaram D. 2019. Experimental assessment of biomechanical properties in human male elbow bone subjected to bending and compression loads. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 17(2):2280800018793816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbulcke F, Rahmoun J, Naceur H, Morvan H, Drazetic P, Fontaine C. 2013. Multiscale modelling of the mechanical behaviour of human humerus under impact. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 16(Suppl 1):211–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varady PA, von Rüden C, Greinwald M, Hungerer S, Pätzold R, Augat P. 2017. Biomechanical comparison of anatomical plating systems for comminuted distal humeral fractures. Int Orthop (SICOT). 41(9):1709–1714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng W, Su J, Cai L, Lou Y, Wang J, Guo X, Tang J, Chen H. 2018. Application of 3D-printing technology in the treatment of humeral intercondylar fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 104(1):83–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar