Hemodynamic study in 3D printed stenotic coronary artery models: experimental validation and transient simulation

References

• Abdolmaleki F, Gheibi Hayat SM, Bianconi V, Johnston TP, Sahebkar A. 2019. Atherosclerosis and immunity: a perspective. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 29(6):363–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abràmoff MD, Magalhães PJ, Ram SJ. 2004. Image processing with imageJ. Biophotonics Int. 11(7):36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi M, Ansari R. 2019. Computational simulation of an artery narrowed by plaque using 3D FSI method: influence of the plaque angle, non-Newtonian properties of the blood flow and the hyperelastic artery models. Biomed Phys Eng Exp. 5(4):45037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed SA, Giddens DP. 1984. Pulsatile poststenotic flow studies with laser Doppler anemometry. J Biomech. 17(9):695–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansys. 2013. ANSYS fluent user’s guide.
   Google Scholar
• Asaad Y, Epshtein M, Yee A, Korin N. 2019. The flow dependent adhesion of von Willebrand Factor (VWF)-A1 functionalized nanoparticles in an in vitro coronary stenosis model. Molecules. 24(15):2679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks J, Bressloff NW. 2007. Turbulence modeling in three-dimensional stenosed arterial bifurcations. J Biomech Eng. 129(1):40–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber T. 2017. Wall shear stress and near-wall flows in the stenosed femoral artery. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 20(10):1048–1055..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biglarian M, Momeni M, Hassanzadeh H, Moshfegh A, Toghraie D, Javadzadegan A, Rostami S. 2020. Computational investigation of stenosis in curvature of coronary artery within both dynamic and static models. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 185(2020):105170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buradi A, Mahalingam A. 2016. Numerical simulation of pulsatile blood flow in an idealized curved section of a human coronary. Int J Mech Prod Eng. Special Issue Sep 2016. 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Buradi A, Mahalingam A. 2018. Effect of stenosis severity on wall shear stress based hemodynamic descriptors using multiphase mixture theory. JAFM. 11(6):1497–1509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buradi A, Morab S, Mahalingam A. 2019. Effect of stenosis severity on shear-induced diffusion of red blood cells in coronary arteries. J Mech Med Biol. 19(05):1950034.
   Google Scholar
• Calejo J, Pinho D, Galindo-Rosales F, Lima R, Campo-Deaño L. 2015. Particulate blood analogues reproducing the erythrocytes cell-free layer in a microfluidic device containing a hyperbolic contraction. Micromachines. 7(1):4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caro CG, Pedley TJ, Schroter RC, Seed WA, Parker KH. 2012. The mechanics of the circulation. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caruso MV, De Rosa S, Indolfi C, Fragomeni G. 2015. Computational analysis of stenosis geometry effects on right coronary hemodynamics. In: Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Bio SocEMBS; Milan, August 2015. p. 981–984.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho V, Maia I, Souza A, Ribeiro J, Costa P, Puga H, Teixeira SFCF, Lima RA. 2020. In vitro stenotic arteries to perform blood analogues flow visualizations and measurements: a review. Open Biomed Eng J, accepted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho V, Rodrigues N, Lima RA, Teixeira S. 2020a. Numerical simulation of blood pulsatile flow in stenotic coronary arteries: the effect of turbulence modeling and non-Newtonian assumptions. International Conference on Applied Mathematics and Computational Science, IEEE. Athens, June 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho V, Rodrigues N, Lima RA, Teixeira SFCF. 2020b. Modeling blood pulsatile turbulent flow in stenotic coronary arteries. Int J Biol Biomed Eng, accepted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho V, Rodrigues N, Ribeiro R, Costa PF, Lima RA, Teixeira SFCF. 2020. 3D printed biomodels for flow visualization in stenotic vessels: an experimental and numerical study. Micromachines. 11(6):549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi W, Park JH, Byeon H, Lee SJ. 2018. Flow characteristics around a deformable stenosis under pulsatile flow condition. Phys Fluids. 30(1):1070–6631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa PF, Albers HJ, Linssen JEA, Middelkamp HHT, Van Der Hout L, Passier R, Van Den Berg A, Malda J, Van Der Meer AD. 2017. Mimicking arterial thrombosis in a 3D-printed microfluidic: in vitro vascular model based on computed tomography angiography data. Lab Chip. 17(16):2785–2792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doutel E, Carneiro J, Campos JBLM, Miranda JM. 2018. Artificial stenoses for computational hemodynamics. Appl Math Model. 59:427–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doutel E, Viriato N, Carneiro J, Campos JBLM, Miranda JM. 2019. Geometrical effects in the hemodynamics of stenotic and non-stenotic left coronary arteries—numerical and in vitro approaches. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 35(1):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ferziger JH, Peric M. 2002. Computational methods for fluid dynamics. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Formaggia L, Quarteroni A, Veneziani A. 2009. Cardiovascular mathematics - modeling and simulation of the circulatory system. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gaudio LT, Caruso MV, De Rosa S, Indolfi C, Fragomeni G. 2018. Different blood flow models in coronary artery diseases: effects on hemodynamic parameters. In Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med and Bio Soc (EMBS);. Honolulu. July 18–21. p. 3185–3188.
   Google Scholar
• Gidaspow D. 1994. Multiphase flow and fluidization: continuum and kinetic theory descriptions. 1st ed. Cambridge: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gijsen F, Katagiri Y, Barlis P, Bourantas C, Collet C, Coskun U, Daemen J, Dijkstra J, Edelman E, Evans P, et al. 2019. Expert recommendations on the assessment of wall shear stress in human coronary arteries: Existing methodologies, technical considerations, and clinical applications. Eur Heart J. 40(41):3421–3433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haverich A, Boyle EC. 2019. Atherosclerosis pathogenesis and microvascular dysfunction. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Huh H, Hojin H, Sang L. 2015. Effect of non-Newtonian viscosity on the fluid-dynamic characteristics in stenotic vessels. Exp Fluids. 56(8):167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabinejadian F, Ghista DN, Su B, Kaabi Nezhadian M, Chua LP, Yeo JH, Leo HL. 2014. In vitro measurements of velocity and wall shear stress in a novel sequential anastomotic graft design model under pulsatile flow conditions. Med Eng Phys. 36(10):1233–1245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.06.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabir MA, Alam MF, Uddin MA. 2018. A numerical study on the effects of Reynolds number on blood flow with spiral velocity through regular arterial stenosis. Chiang Mai J Sci. 45(6):2515–2527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamangar S, Badruddin IA, Badarudin A, Nik-Ghazali N, Govindaraju K, Salman Ahmed NJ, Yunus Khan TM. 2017. Influence of stenosis on hemodynamic parameters in the realistic left coronary artery under hyperemic conditions. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 20(4):365–372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2016.1233402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kefayati S, Holdsworth DW, Poepping TL. 2014. Turbulence intensity measurements using particle image velocimetry in diseased carotid artery models: effect of stenosis severity, plaque eccentricity, and ulceration. J Biomech. 47(1):253–263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.09.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kefayati S, Milner JS, Holdsworth DW, Poepping TL. 2014. In vitro shear stress measurements using particle image velocimetry in a family of carotid artery models: effect of stenosis severity, plaque eccentricity, and ulceration. PLoS One. 9(7):e98209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelidis P, Konstantinidis E. 2018. Pulsatile flow through a constricted tube: effect of stenosis morphology on hemodynamic parameters. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 21(7):479–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Zheng J, Bach R, Tang D. 2015. Influence of model boundary conditions on blood flow patterns in a patient specific stenotic right coronary artery. BioMed Eng. 14(Suppl 1):S6.
   Google Scholar
• Mahalingam A, Gawandalkar UU, Kini G, Buradi A, Araki T, Ikeda N, Nicolaides A, Laird JR, Saba L, Suri JS. 2016. Numerical analysis of the effect of turbulence transition on the hemodynamic parameters in human coronary arteries. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 6(3):208–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malek AM, Alper SL. 1999. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. Am Med Assoc. 282(21):2035–2042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manninen M, Taivassalo V, Kallio S. 1996. On the mixture model for multiphase flow. 1st ed. Espoo: Valtion Teknillen Tutkimuskeskus (VTT).
   Google Scholar
• Martin DM, Murphy EA, Boyle FJ. 2014. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of balloon-expandable coronary stents: influence of stent and vessel deformation. Med Eng Phys. 36(8):1047–1056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno C, Bhaganagar K. 2013. Modeling of stenotic coronary artery and implications of plaque morphology on blood flow. Model Simul Eng. 2013(7):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Mulani SS, Jagad PI. 2015. Analysis of the effects of plaque deposits on the blood flow through human artery. Int Eng Res J. 41(2):2319–3182.
   Google Scholar
• Nagargoje M, Gupta R. 2020. Effect of asymmetry on the flow behavior in an idealized arterial bifurcation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 23(6):232–247..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostadfar A. 2016. Biofluid mechanics: principles and applications. 1st ed. Berlin: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrowski Z, Melka B, Adamczyk W, Rojczyk M, Golda A, Nowak AJ. 2016. CFD analysis of multiphase blood flow within aorta and its thoracic branches of patient with coarctation of aorta using multiphase Euler - Euler approach. J Phys Conf Ser. 745(3):32112.
   Google Scholar
• Pinho D, Campo-Deaño L, Lima R, Pinho FT. 2017. In vitro particulate analogue fluids for experimental studies of rheological and hemorheological behavior of glucose-rich RBC suspensions. Biomicrofluidics. 11(5):054105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinho D, Lima R, Pereira A, Gayubo F. 2013. Automatic tracking of labeled red blood cells in microchannels. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng. 29(9):977–987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto SIS, Campos JBLM. 2016. Numerical study of wall shear stress-based descriptors in the human left coronary artery. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 19(13):1443–1455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi A, Shirani E, Sadeghi MR. 2011. Numerical simulation of blood pulsatile flow in a stenosed carotid artery using different rheological models. J Biomech. 44(11):2021–2030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubenstein DA, Yin W, Frame M. 2015. Biofluid Mechanics. 2nd ed. Berlin: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Souza A, Souza MS, Pinho D, Agujetas R, Ferrera C, Lima R, Puga H, Ribeiro J. 2020. 3D manufacturing of intracranial aneurysm biomodels for flow visualizations: a low-cost fabrication process. Mech Res Commun. 107:103535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryval J, Straatman AG, Steinman DA. 2004. Two-equation turbulence modeling of pulsatile flow in a stenosed tube. J Biomech Eng. 126(5):625–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabe R, Ghalichi F, Hossainpour S, Ghasemzadeh K. 2016. Laminar-to-turbulence and relaminarization zones detection by simulation of low Reynolds number turbulent blood flow in large stenosed arteries. Biomed Mater Eng. 27(2–3):119–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor P, Linge F, Hye A, Paul MC, Hye MA, Paul MC. 2014. Pulsatile spiral blood flow through arterial stenosis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 17(15):1727–1737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu J, Inthavong K, Wong K. 2015. Computational hemodynamics - theory, modelling and applications. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Versteeg HK, Malalasekera W. 2007. An introduction to computational fluid dynamics, the finite volume method. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wen J, Liu K, Khoshmanesh K, Jiang W, Zheng T. 2015. Numerical investigation of haemodynamics in a helical-type artery bypass graft using non-Newtonian multiphase model. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 18(7):760–768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2013.845880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Liu G, Huang W, Ghista DN, Wong KKL. 2015. Transient blood flow in elastic coronary arteries with varying degrees of stenosis and dilatations: CFD modelling and parametric study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 18(16):1835–1845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W, Aubry N, Massoudi M, Kim J, Antaki J. 2014. A numerical study of blood flow using mixture theory Wei-Tao. Int J Eng Sci. 76:56–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu WT, Li Y, Aubry N, Massoudi M, Antaki JF. 2017. Numerical simulation of red blood cell-induced platelet transport in saccular aneurysms. Appl Sci. 7(5):484.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou F-F, Liu Y-h, Ge P-C, Chen Z-H, Ding X-Q, Liu J-Y, Jia Q-W, An F-H, Li L-H, Wang L-S, et al. 2017. Coronary artery diameter is inversely associated with the severity of coronary lesions in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Cell Physiol Biochem. 43(3):1247–1257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar