Flow analysis of aortic dissection: comparison of inflow boundary conditions for computational models based on 4D PCMRI and Doppler ultrasound

References

• Andacheh ID, Donayre C, Othman F, Walot I, Kopchok G, White R. 2012. Patient outcomes and thoracic aortic volume and morphologic changes following thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with complicated chronic type B aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg. 56(3):644–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell IC, Ries J, Dhawan SS, Quyyumi AA, Taylor WR, Oshinski JN. 2012. Effect of inlet velocity profiles on patient-specific computational fluid dynamics simulations of the carotid bifurcation. J Biomech Eng. 134(5):051001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen D, Müller-Eschner M, Kotelis D, Böckler D, Ventikos Y, Von T-KH. 2013. A longitudinal study of type-B aortic dissection and endovascular repair scenarios: computational analyses. Med Eng Phys. 35(9):1321–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen D, Müller-Eschner M, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Barber D, Böckler D, Hose R, Ventikos Y. 2013. A patient-specific study of type-B aortic dissection: evaluation of true-false lumen blood exchange. Biomed Eng Online. 12(1):65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheng Z, Juli C, Wood NB, Gibbs RG, Xu XY. 2014. Predicting flow in aortic dissection: comparison of computational model with PC-MRI velocity measurements. Med Eng Phys. 36(9):1176–1184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Z, Wood NB, Gibbs RG, Xu XY. 2015. Geometric and flow features of type B aortic dissection: initial findings and comparison of medically treated and stented cases. Ann Biomed Eng. 43(1):177–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criado FJ. 2011. Aortic dissection: a 250-year perspective. Tex Heart Inst J. 38(6):694–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily PO, Trueblood HW, Stinson EB, Wuerflein RD, Shumway NE. 1970. Management of acute aortic dissections. Ann Thoracic Surg. 10(3):237–247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doyle BJ, Norman PE. 2016. Computational biomechanics in thoracic aortic dissection: today's approaches and tomorrow's opportunities. Ann Biomed Eng. 44(1):71–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielden S, Fornwalt B, H M, Eisner R, Stillman A, Oshinski J. 2008. A new method for the determination of aortic pulse wave velocity using cross-correlation on 2D PCMR velocity data. J Magn Reson Imaging. 27(6):1382–1387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo D, De Santis G, Negri F, Tresoldi D, Ponzini R, Massai D, Deriu MA, Segers P, Verhegghe B, Rizzo G, et al. 2012. On the use of in vivo measured flow rates as boundary conditions for image-based hemodynamic models of the human aorta: implications for indicators of abnormal flow. Ann Biomed Eng. 40(3):729–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganten MK, Weber TF, Von T-KH, Böckler D, Stiller W, Geisbüsch P, Kauffmann GW, Delorme S, Bock M, Kauczor HU. 2009. Motion characterization of aortic wall and intimal flap by ECG-gated CT in patients with chronic B-dissection. Eur J Radiol. 72(1):146–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmonik C, Bismuth J, Davies MG, Shah DJ, Younes HK, Lumsden AB. 2011. A computational fluid dynamics study pre- and post-stent graft placement in an acute type B aortic dissection. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 45(2):157–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmonik C, Bismuth J, Redel T, Anaya-Ayala JE, Davies MG, Shah DJ, Lumsden AB. 2010. Impact of tear location on hemodynamics in a type B aortic dissection investigated with computational fluid dynamics. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010(10):3138–3141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karmonik C, Müller-Eschner M, Partovi S, Geisbüsch P, Ganten M-K, Bismuth J, Davies MG, Böckler D, Loebe M, Lumsden AB, et al. 2013. Computational fluid dynamics investigation of chronic aortic dissection hemodynamics versus normal aorta. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 47(8):625–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menichini C, Cheng Z, Gibbs RG, Xu XY. 2016. Predicting false lumen thrombosis in patient-specific models of aortic dissection. J R Soc Interface. 13(124):20160759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morbiducci U, Ponzini R, Gallo D, Bignardi C, Rizzo G. 2013. Inflow boundary conditions for image-based computational hemodynamics: Impact of idealized versus measured velocity profiles in the human aorta. J Biomech. 46(1):102–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naim WNWA, Ganesan PB, Sun Z, Liew YM, Qian Y, Lee C-J, Jansen S, Hashim SA, Lim E. 2016. Prediction of thrombus formation using vortical structures presentation in Stanford type B aortic dissection: A preliminary study using CFD approach. Appl Math Modell. 40(4):3115–3127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaharilaou Y, Doorly DJ, Sherwin SJ. 2002. The influence of out-of-plane geometry on pulsatile flow within a distal end-to-side anastomosis. J Biomech. 35(9):1225–1239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirola S, Guo B, Menichini C, Saitta S, Fu W, Dong Z, Xu XY. 2019. 4D flow MRI-based computational analysis of blood flow in patient-specific aortic dissection. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 66(12):3411–3411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang EK, Nathan DP, Fairman RM, Bavaria JE, Gorman RC, Gorman IIJ, Jackson BM. 2015. Use of computational fluid dynamics studies in predicting aneurysmal degeneration of acute type B aortic dissections. J Vasc Surg. 62(2):279–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigman MM, Palmer OP, Ham SW, Cunningham M, Weaver FA. 2014. Aortic morphologic findings after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection. JAMA Surg. 149(9):977–983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan FPP, Borghi A, Mohiaddin RH, Wood NB, Thom S, Xu XY. 2009. Analysis of flow patterns in a patient-specific thoracic aortic aneurysm model. Computers & Structures. 87(11–12):680–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse KM, Chiu P, Lee HP, Pei H. 2011. Investigation of hemodynamics in the development of dissecting aneurysm within patient-specific dissecting aneurismal aortas using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. J Biomech. 44(5):827–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignon-Clementel IE, Figueroa CA, Jansen KE, Taylor CA. 2006. Outflow boundary conditions for three-dimensional finite element modeling of blood flow and pressure in arteries. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 195(29–32):3776–3796.
   Google Scholar
• Xu H, Li Z, Dong H, Zhang Y, Wei J, Watton PN, Guo W, Chen D, Xiong J. 2017. Hemodynamic parameters that may predict false-lumen growth in type-B aortic dissection after endovascular repair: a preliminary study on long-term multiple follow-ups. Med Eng Phys. 50:12–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Mei Y, Han X, Wei J, Watton PN, Jia W, Li A, Chen D, Xiong J. 2019. Optimization schemes for endovascular repair with parallel technique based on hemodynamic analyses. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 35(6):e3197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Piccinelli M, Leshnower BG, Lefieux A, Taylor WR, Veneziani A. 2018. Coupled morphological–hemodynamic computational analysis of type B aortic dissection: a longitudinal study. Ann Biomed Eng. 46(7):927–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Xiong J, Han X, Mei Y, Shi Y, Wang D, Zhang M, Chen D. 2020. Computed tomography-based hemodynamic index for aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.02.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar