Carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK in implant dentistry: A scoping review on the finite element method

References

• Bataineh K, Al Janaideh M. 2019. Effect of different biocompatible implant materials on the mechanical stability of dental implants under excessive oblique load. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 21(6):1206–1217. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cid.12858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beirami S, Nikkhoo M, Hassani K, Karimi A. 2021. A comparative finite element simulation of locking compression plate materials for tibial fracture treatment. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. On line ahead of print. 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bins-Ely L, Suzuki D, Magini R, Benfatti CAM, Teughels W, Henriques B, Souza JCM. 2020. Enhancing the bone healing on electrical stimuli through the dental implant. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elawadly T, Radi IAW, El Khadem A, Osman RB. 2017. Can PEEK be an implant material? Evaluation of surface topography and wettability of filled versus unfilled PEEK with different surface roughness. J Oral Implantol. 43(6):456–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabris D, Souza JCM, Silva FS, Fredel M, Gasik M, Henriques B. 2018. Influence of specimens’ geometry and materials on the thermal stresses in dental restorative materials during thermal cycling. J Dent. 69. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28104926/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabris D, Souza JCM, Silva FS, Fredel M, Mesquita-Guimarães J, Zhang Y, Henriques B. 2016. The bending stress distribution in bilayered and graded zirconia-based dental ceramics. Ceram Int. 42(9):11025–11031. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher EA, Lamorinière S, McGarry P. 2018. Multi-axial damage and failure of medical grade carbon fibre reinforced PEEK laminates: Experimental testing and computational modelling. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 82:154–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han X, Yang D, Yang C, Spintzyk S, Scheideler L, Li P, Li D, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Rupp F. 2019. Carbon fiber reinforced PEEK composites based on 3D-printing technology for orthopedic and dental applications. J Clin Med. 8(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung H-C, Huang C-S, Pan Y-H. 2019. The compressive strength of implant-abutment complex with different connection designs. J Dent Sci. 14(3):318–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaleli N, Sarac D, Külünk S, Öztürk Ö. 2018. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study. J Prosthet Dent. 119(3):437–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khonsari RH, Berthier P, Rouillon T, Perrin J-P, Corre P. 2014. Severe infectious complications after PEEK-derived implant placement: Report of three cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surgery. Med Pathol [Internet]. 26(4):477–482. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212555813000586.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz SM. 2019. Chapter 1 - An overview of PEEK biomaterials. In: Kurtz SM, editor. PEEK Biomater Handb. 2nd ed. William Andrew Publishing; Norwich, NY, USA. p. 3–9. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128125243000016.
   Google Scholar
• Lee W-T, Koak J-Y, Lim Y-J, Kim S-K, Kwon H-B, Kim M-J. 2012. Stress shielding and fatigue limits of poly-ether-ether-ketone dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 100(4):1044–1052.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopez CAV, Vasco MAA, Ruales E, Bedoya KA, Benfatti CM, Bezzon OL, Deliberador TM. 2018. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in Zirconia and Titanium dental implants. J Oral Implantol. 44(6):409–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo JP, Pereira J, Faria J, Souza JCM, Alves JL, López-López J, Henriques B. 2018. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 21(12):655–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila RH, Laurila P, Rekola J, Gunn J, Lassila LVJ, Mäntylä T, Aho AJ, Vallittu PK. 2009. Bone attachment to glass-fibre-reinforced composite implant with porous surface. Acta Biomater. 5(5):1639–1646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monich PR, Henriques B, Novaes de Oliveira AP, Souza JCM, Fredel MC. 2016. Mechanical and biological behavior of biomedical PEEK matrix composites: A focused review. Mater Lett. 185:593–597. [Internet]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, Matinlinna JP, Siddiqui F, Nassani MZ, Baroudi K. 2015. Nanomodified peek dental implants: Bioactive composites and surface modification-A review. Int J Dent. 2015:381759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, Siddiqui F. 2016. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res. 60(1):12–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimbalkar S, Dhatrak P, Gherde C, Joshi S. 2020. A review article on factors affecting bone loss in dental implants. Mater Today Proc [Internet]. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214785320355383.
   Google Scholar
• Parmigiani-Izquierdo JM, Cabaña-Muñoz ME, Merino JJ, Sánchez-Pérez A. 2017. Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars. Int J Implant Dent. 3(1):5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pereira J, Morsch CS, Henriques B, Nascimento RM, Benfatti CAM, Silva F, et al. 2016. Removal torque and bio"lm accumulation at two dental implant- abutment joints after fatigue. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 31:813–819.
   Google Scholar
• Prado AM, Pereira J, Henriques B, Benfatti CAM, Magini RS, López-López J, et al. 2016. Bio"lm affecting the mechanical integrity of implant-abutment joints. Int J Prosthodont 2016;29:381–393.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmitasari F, Ishida Y, Kurahashi K, Matsuda T, Watanabe M, Ichikawa T. 2017. PEEK with reinforced materials and modifications for dental implant applications. Dent J. 5(4).
   Google Scholar
• Rezaei F, Hassani K, Solhjoei N, Karimi A. 2015. Carbon/PEEK composite materials as an alternative for stainless steel/titanium hip prosthesis: a finite element study. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 38(4):569–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues YL, Mathew MT, Mercuri LG, da Silva JSP, Henriques B, Souza JCM. Biomechanical simulation of temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJR) devices: a scoping review of the finite element method. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47(8):1032–1042. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2018.02.005.
   Google Scholar
• Sampaio M, Buciumeanu M, Askari E, Flores P, Souza JCM, Gomes JR, Silva FS, Henriques B. 2016. Effects of poly-ether-ether ketone (PEEK) veneer thickness on the reciprocating friction and wear behavior of PEEK/Ti6Al4V structures in artificial saliva. Wear. 368-369:84–91. [Internet]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2016.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago JJ, Verri FR, Almeida DA de F, de Souza Batista VE, Lemos CAA, Pellizzer EP. 2016. Finite element analysis on influence of implant surface treatments, connection and bone types. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 63:292–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarot JR, Contar CMM, Cruz AD, De Souza Magini R. 2010. Evaluation of the stress distribution in CFR-PEEK dental implants by the three-dimensional finite element method. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 21(7):2079–2085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasada Y, Cochran DL. 2017. Implant-abutment connections: A review of biologic consequences and peri-implantitis implications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 32(6):1296–1307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitalla A, Müller W-D. 2013. PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol. 39(6):743–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitalla AD, Abou-Emara M, Spintig T, Lackmann J, Muller WD. 2015. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone. J Biomech. 48(1):1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitalla AD, Abou-Emara M, Zimmermann T, Spintig T, Beuer F, Lackmann J, Muller W-D. 2016. The applicability of PEEK-based abutment screws. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 63:244–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spies BC, Fross A, Adolfsson E, Bagegni A, Doerken S, Kohal R-J. 2018. Stability and aging resistance of a zirconia oral implant using a carbon fiber-reinforced screw for implant-abutment connection. Dent Mater. 34(10):1585–1595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza JCM, Sordi MB, Kanazawa M, Ravindran S, Henriques B, Silva FS, Aparicio C, Cooper LF. Nano-scale modification of titanium implant surfaces to enhance osseointegration. Acta Biomater. 2019;94:112–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.045.
   Google Scholar
• Tekin S, Cangül S, Adıgüzel Ö, Değer Y. 2018. Areas for use of PEEK material in dentistry. Int Dent Res. 8(2):84–92.
   Google Scholar
• Tekin S, Değer Y, Demirci F. 2019. Evaluation of the use of PEEK material in implant-supported fixed restorations by finite element analysis. Niger J Clin Pract. 22(9):1252–1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wazeh AM, El-Anwar MI, Atia RMG, Mahjari RM, Linga SA, Al-Pakistani LMA, Yousief SA. 2018. 3D FEA study on implant threading role on selection of implant and crown materials. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 6(9):1702–1706.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar