Mandibular reconstruction system reliability analysis using probabilistic finite element method

References

• Al-Ahmari A, Nasr EA, Moiduddin K, Anwar S, Kindi MA, Kamrani A. 2015. A comparative study on the customized design of mandibular reconstruction plates using finite element method. Adv Mech Eng. 7(7):1687814015593890.
   Google Scholar
• Amirpourabasi A, Pourgol-Mohammad M, Niroomand-Oscuii H. 2017. Reliability evaluation for biomedical systems: case study of a biological cell freezing. Curr Trends Biomed Eng Biosci. 6(3):45–52.
   Google Scholar
• An YH, Draughn RA, editors. 1999. Mechanical testing of bone and the bone-implant interface. New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bah MT, Browne M. 2004. Failure of the cement mantle in hip implants: a probabilistic approach. 50th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco (CA).
   Google Scholar
• Bak M, Jacobson AS, Buchbinder D, Urken ML. 2010. Contemporary reconstruction of the mandible. Oral Oncol. 46(2):71–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd JB, Mulholland RS, Davidson J, Gullane PJ, Rotstein LE, Brown DH, Freeman JE, Irish JC. 1995. The free flap and plate in oromandibular reconstruction: long-term review and indications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 95(6):1018–1028.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown JS, Barry C, Ho M, Shaw R. 2016. A new classification for mandibular defects after oncological resection. Lancet Oncol. 17(1):e23–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Browne M, Langley RS, Gregson PJ. 1999. Reliability theory for load bearing biomedical implants. Biomaterials. 20(14):1285–1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bujtár P, Simonovics J, Váradi K, Sándor GK, Avery CME. 2014. The biomechanical aspects of reconstruction for segmental defects of the mandible: a finite element study to assess the optimisation of plate and screw factors. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 42(6):855–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng KJ, Liu YF, Wang JH, Jun JC, Jiang XF, Wang R, Baur DA. 2019. Biomechanical behavior of mandibles reconstructed with fibular grafts at different vertical positions using finite element method. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 72(2):281–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopico-Gonzalez C, New AM, Browne M. 2010. A computational tool for the probabilistic finite element analysis of an uncemented total hip replacement considering variability in bone–implant version angle. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 13(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopico-Gonzalez C, New AM, Browne M. 2010. Probabilistic finite element analysis of the uncemented hip replacement-effect of femur characteristics and implant design geometry. J Biomech. 43(3):512–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easley SK, Pal S, Tomaszewski PR, Petrella AJ, Rullkoetter PJ, Laz PJ. 2007. Finite element-based probabilistic analysis tool for orthopaedic applications. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 85(1):32–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias ML, Weisberger JS, Barinsky GL, Paskhover B. 2019. Adverse events involving mandibular hardware: an analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Facility Device Experience data. Oral Surg. 12(1):5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Fang JJ, Tu YH, Wong TY, Liu JK, Zhang YX, Leong IF, Chen KC. 2016. Evaluation of mandibular contour in patients with significant facial asymmetry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 45(7):922–931.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferri J, Piot B, Ruhin B, Mercier J. 1997. Advantages and limitations of the fibula free flap in mandibular reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 55(5):440–448.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fontana SC, Smith RB, Nazir N, Andrews BT. 2016. Biomechanical assessment of fixation methods for segmental mandible reconstruction with fibula in the polyurethane model. Microsurgery. 36(4):330–333.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gadala MS. 2005. Finite element applications in dynamics. In: de Silva CW, editor. Vibration and shock handbook (Chapter 9, p. 9–21). New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garajei A, Arabkheradmand A, Motamedi MHK, Pazoki AE, Rashad A. 2015. Reconstruction of the face following cancer ablation. In: A textbook of advanced oral and maxillofacial surgery. Vol. 2. IntechOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Gurtner GC, Evans GR. 2000. Advances in head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 106(3):672–682.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanson J, Lovald S, Cowgill I, Erdman M, Diamond B. 2011. National hardware removal rate associated with internal fixation of facial fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 69(4):1152–1158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huja SS, Litsky AS, Beck FM, Johnson KA, Larsen PE. 2005. Pull-out strength of monocortical screws placed in the maxillae and mandibles of dogs. Am J Orthodontics Dentofacial Orthopedics. 127(3):307–313.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Irish JC, Gullane PJ, Gilbert RW, Brown DH, Birt BD, Boyd JB. 1995. Primary mandibular reconstruction with the titanium hollow screw reconstruction plate: evaluation of 51 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 96(1):93–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jahadakbar A, Shayesteh Moghaddam N, Amerinatanzi A, Dean D, Karaca HE, Elahinia M. 2016. Finite element simulation and additive manufacturing of stiffness-matched niti fixation hardware for mandibular reconstruction surgery. Bioengineering. 3(4):36.
   Google Scholar
• Kayabasi O, Ekici B. 2008. Probabilistic design of a newly designed cemented hip prosthesis using finite element method. Mater Des. 29(5):963–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayabaşı O, Yüzbasıoğlu E, Erzincanlı F. 2006. Static, dynamic and fatigue behaviors of dental implant using finite element method. Adv Eng Softw. 37(10):649–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura A, Nagasao T, Kaneko T, Tamaki T, Miyamoto J, Nakajima T. 2006. Adaquate fixation of plates for stability during mandibular reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 34(4):193–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoll WD, Gaida A, Maurer P. 2006. Analysis of mechanical stress in reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle defects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 34(4):201–209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koonce RC, Baldini TH, Morgan SJ. 2012. Are conventional reconstruction plates equivalent to precontoured locking plates for distal humerus fracture fixation? A biomechanics cadaver study. Clin Biomech. 27(7):697–701.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar BP, Venkatesh V, Kumar KJ, Yadav BY, Mohan SR. 2016. Mandibular reconstruction: overview. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 15(4):425–441.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li P, Shen L, Li J, Liang R, Tian W, Tang W. 2014. Optimal design of an individual endoprosthesis for the reconstruction of extensive mandibular defects with finite element analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 42(1):73–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Tang Y, Li J, Shen L, Tian W, Tang W. 2013. Establishment of sequential software processing for a biomechanical model of mandibular reconstruction with custom-made plate. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 111(3):642–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariani PB, Kowalski LP, Magrin J. 2006. Reconstruction of large defects postmandibulectomy for oral cancer using plates and myocutaneous flaps: a long-term follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 35(5):427–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markwardt J, Pfeifer G, Eckelt U, Reitemeier B. 2007. Analysis of complications after reconstruction of bone defects involving complete mandibular resection using finite element modelling. Onkologie. 30(3):121–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maurer P, Pistner H, Schubert J. 2006. Computer assisted chewing power in patients with segmental resection of the mandible. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 10(1):37–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• May B, Saha S, Saltzman M. 2001. A three-dimensional mathematical model of temporomandibular joint loading. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)). 16(6):489–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modarres M, Amiri M, Jackson C. 2017. Probabilistic physics of failure approach to reliability: modeling, accelerated testing, prognosis and reliability assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Modarres M, Kaminskiy MP, Krivtsov V. 2016. Reliability engineering and risk analysis: a practical guide. New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moiduddin K, Mian SH, Alkhalefah H, Umer U. 2019. Digital design, analysis and 3D printing of prosthesis scaffolds for mandibular reconstruction. Metals. 9(5):569.
   Google Scholar
• Narra N, Valášek J, Hannula M, Marcián P, Sándor GK, Hyttinen J, Wolff J. 2014. Finite element analysis of customized reconstruction plates for mandibular continuity defect therapy. J Biomech. 47(1):264–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolella DP, Thacker BH, Katoozian H, Davy DT. 2006. The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis. J Biomech. 39(7):1265–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Fearraigh P. 2010. Review of methods used in the reconstruction and rehabilitation of the maxillofacial region. J Ir Dent Assoc. 56(1):32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Oskui IZ, Hashemi A, Jafarzadeh H, Kato A. 2018. Finite element investigation of human maxillary incisor under traumatic loading: static vs dynamic analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 155:121–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SM, Lee JW, Noh G. 2018. Which plate results in better stability after segmental mandibular resection and fibula free flap reconstruction? Biomechanical analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 126(5):380–389.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peacock ZS, Afshar S, Lukas SJ, Kaban LB. 2012. Customized repair of fractured mandibular reconstruction plates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 70(10):e563–573.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petrie CS, Williams JL. 2007. Probabilistic analysis of peri-implant strain predictions as influenced by uncertainties in bone properties and occlusal forces . Clin Oral Implants Res. 18(5):611–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro M, Alves JL. 2015. The feasibility of a custom-made endoprosthesis in mandibular reconstruction: implant design and finite element analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 43(10):2116–2128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakakibara A, Hashikawa K, Yokoo S, Sakakibara S, Komori T, Tahara S. 2014. Risk factors and surgical refinements of postresective mandibular reconstruction: a retrospective study. Plast Surg Int. 2014:893746.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Samman N, Luk WK, Chow TW, Cheung LK, Tideman H, Clark RK. 1999. Custom-made titanium mandibular reconstruction tray. Aust Dent J. 44(3):195–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Svensson M, Ackelid U, Ab A. 2010. Titanium alloys manufactured with electron beam melting mechanical and chemical properties. In: Proceedings of the Materials and Processes for Medical Devices Conference. ASM International. p. 189–194.
   Google Scholar
• Ueyama Y, Naitoh R, Yamagata A, Matsumura T. 1996. Analysis of reconstruction of mandibular defects using single stainless steel AO reconstruction plates. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 54(7):858–862.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang C, Li Q, McClean C, Fan Y. 2013. Numerical simulation of dental bone remodeling induced by implant-supported fixed partial denture with or without cantilever extension . Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 29(10):1134–1147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar