Predicting TAVI paravalvular regurgitation outcomes based on numerical simulation of the aortic annulus eccentricity and perivalvular areas

References

• Bailey J, Curzen B, Bresslo NW. 2016. Assessing the impact of including leaflets in the simulation of TAVI deployment into a patient-specific aortic root. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 19(7):733–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi M, Marom G, Ghosh RP, Fernandez HA, Taylor JR, Jr, Slepian MJ, Bluestein D. 2016. Effect of balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement positioning: a patient-specific numerical model. Artif Organs. 40(12):E292–E304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cignoni P, et al. 2008. MeshLab: an open-source mesh processing tool. Sixth Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference, page 129–136
   Google Scholar
• COMSOL Multiphysics v.5.4. www.comsol.com. COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Coughlan JJ, Kiernan T, Mylotte D, Arnous S. 2018. Annular rupture during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: predictors, management and outcomes. Interv Cardiol. 13(3):140–144.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dimasi A, et al. 2015. Finite element analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the presence of aortic leaflet calcifications. In Lenarz T., Wriggers P., editors. Biomedical technology. Lecture notes in applied and computational mechanics, vol 74. Cham: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Fanni BM, Capellini K, Di Leonardo M, Clemente A, Cerone E, Berti S, Celi S. 2020. Correlation between LAA morphological features and computational fluid dynamics analysis for non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients. Appl. Sci. 10(4):1448.
   Google Scholar
• Horehledova B, Mihl C, Hendriks BMF, Eijsvoogel NG, Vainer J, Veenstra LF, Wildberger JE, Das M. 2018. Do CTA measurements of annular diameter, perimeter and area result in different TAVI prosthesis sizes? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 34(11):1819–1829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juergen R, Werner M, Yorik v. H. 2001–2018. FreeCAD v 2018.0.16. [Software]. Available from http://www.freecadweb.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Loureiro-Ga M, Veiga C, Fdez-Manin G, Jimenez VA, Calvo-Iglesias F, Iniguez A. 2020. A biomechanical model of the pathological aortic valve: simulation of aortic stenosis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 23(8):303–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migliori S, Rampat R, Bologna M, Montin E, Burzotta F, Hildick-Smith D, Dubini G, Mainardi L, Migliavacca F, Cockburn J, et al. 2018. A patient-specific study investigating the relation between coronary hemodynamics and neo-intimal thickening after bifurcation stenting with a polymeric bioresorbable scaffold. Appl. Sci. 8(9):1510.
   Google Scholar
• Pasic M, Unbehaun A, Buz S, Drews T, Hetzer R. 2015. Annular rupture during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: classification, pathophysiology, diagnostics, treatment approaches, and prevention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 8(1 Pt A):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasta S, et al. 2019. Simulation study of transcatheter heart valve implantation in patients with stenotic bicuspid aortic valve. Med Biol Eng Comput. 58:815–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocatello G, El Faquir N, de Backer O, Swaans MJ, Latib A, Vicentini L, Segers P, De Beule M, de Jaegere P, Mortier P, et al. 2019. The impact of size and position of a mechanical expandable transcatheter aortic valve: novel insights through computational modelling and simulation. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 12(5):435–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocatello G, El Faquir N, De Santis G, Iannaccone F, Bosmans J, De Backer O, Sondergaard L, Segers P, De Beule M, de Jaegere P, et al. 2018. Patient-specific computer simulation to elucidate the role of contact pressure in the development of new conduction abnormalities after catheter-based implantation of a self-expanding aortic valve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 11(2):e005344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturla F, Ronzoni M, Vitali M, Dimasi A, Vismara R, Preston-Maher G, Burriesci G, Votta E, Redaelli A. 2016. Impact of different aortic valve calcification patterns on the outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a finite element study. J Biomech . 49(12):2520–2530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturla F, Votta E, Stevanella M, Conti C, Redaelli A. 2013. Impact of modeling fluid-structure interaction in the computational analysis of aortic root biomechanics. Med Eng & Phys. 35: 1721–1730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzamtzis S, Viquerat J, Yap J, Mullen MJ, Burriesci G. 2013. Numerical analysis of the radial force produced by the Medtronic-CoreValve and Edwards-SAPIEN after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Med Eng Phys. 35(1):125–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandvik PO, Otto CM, Siemieniuk RA, et al. 2016. Transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement for patients with severe, symptomatic, aortic stenosis at low to intermediate surgical risk: a clinical practice guideline. BMJ. 354:i5085.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vy P, Auffret V, Badel P, Rochette M, Le Breton H, Haigron P, Avril S. 2016. Review of patient-specific simulations of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Adv Eng Sci Appl Math. 8(1):2–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Kodali S, Primiano C, Sun W. 2015. Simulations of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: implications for aortic root rupture. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 14(1):29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoghbi WA, Asch FM, Bruce C, Gillam LD, Grayburn PA, Hahn RT, Inglessis I, Islam AM, Lerakis S, Little SH, et al. 2019. Guidelines for the evaluation of valvular regurgitation after percutaneous valve repair or replacement a report from the American society of echocardiography developed in collaboration with the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions, Japanese society of echocardiography, and society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 32(4):431–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar