A modified method of computed fluid dynamics simulation in abdominal aorta and visceral arteries

References

• Behnam AJ, Herzka DA, Sheeha FT. 2011. Assessing the accuracy and precision of musculoskeletal motion tracking using cine-PC MRI on a 3.0T platform. J Biomech. 44(1):193–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidhult SL, Carlsson M, Steding-Ehrenborg K, Arheden H, Heiberg E. 2014. A new method for vessel segmentation based on a priori input from medical expertise in cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 16(S1):355.
   Google Scholar
• Bonfanti M, Balabani S, Alimohammadi M, Agu O, Homer-Vanniasinkam S, Díaz-Zuccarini V. 2018. A simplified method to account for wall motion in patient-specific blood flow simulations of aortic dissection: comparison with fluid–structure interaction. Med Eng Phys. 58:72–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutsianis E, Guala M, Olgac U, Wildermuth S, Hoyer K, Ventikos Y, Poulikakos D. 2009. CFD and PTV steady flow investigation in an anatomically accurate abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech Eng. 131(1):011008. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3002886
   Google Scholar
• Boyd AJ, Kuhn DCS, Lozowy RJ, Kulbisky GP. 2016. Low wall shear stress predominates at sites of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. J Vasc Surg. 63(6):1613–1619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burris NS, Hope MD. 2015. 4D flow MRI applications for aortic disease. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 23(1):15–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Yu H, Shi Y, Zhu M, Wang Y, Hu X, Zhang Y, Chang Y, Xu M, Gao W, et al. 2017. Vascular remodelling relates to an elevated oscillatory shear index and relative residence time in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Sci Rep. 7(1):2007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eshtehardi P, Brown AJ, Bhargava A, Costopoulos C, Hung OY, Corban MT, Hosseini H, Gogas BD, Giddens DP, Samady H, et al. 2017. High wall shear stress and high-risk plaque: an emerging concept. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 33(7):1089–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford LE, Feldman T, Chiu YC, Carroll JD. 1990. Hemodynamic resistance as a measure of functional impairment in aortic valvular stenosis. Circ Res. 66(1):1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijsen FJH, van de Vosse FN, Janssen JD. 1999. The influence of the non-Newtonian properties of blood on the flow in large arteries: steady flow in a carotid bifurcation model. J Biomech. 32(6):601–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinberg L, Karniadakis GE. 2008. Outflow boundary conditions for arterial networks with multiple outlets. Ann Biomed Eng. 36(9):1496–1514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiberg E, Markenroth BK, Arheden H. 2007. Validation of free software for automated vessel delineation and MRI flow analysis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 9:375–376.
   Google Scholar
• Jamalidinan F, Hassanabad AF, François CJ, Garcia J. 2020. Four-dimensional-flow magnetic resonance imaging of the aortic valve and thoracic aorta. Radiol Clin North Am. 58(4):753–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Qiu Y, Li D, Yuan D, Zheng T, Peng L. 2019. Influence of aortic branch arteries on the hemodynamics of patient-specific type B aortic dissection following TEVAR. Med Novel Technol Devices. 4:100028.
   Google Scholar
• Kolyva C, Biglino G, Pepper JR, Khir AW. 2012. A mock circulatory system with physiological distribution of terminal resistance and compliance: application for testing the intra-aortic balloon pump. Artif Org. 36(3):E62–E70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kung EO, Les AS, Medina F, Wicker RB, McConnell MV, Taylor CA. 2011. In vitro validation of finite-element model of AAA hemodynamics incorporating realistic outlet boundary conditions. J Biomech Eng. 133(4):041003. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003526
   Google Scholar
• Lan H, Updegrove A, Wilson NM, Maher GD, Shadden SC, Marsden AL. 2018. A re-engineered software interface and workflow for the open source SimVascular cardiovascular modeling package. J Biomech Eng. 140(2):024501. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038751
   Google Scholar
• Les AS, Shadden SC, Figueroa CA, Park JM, Tedesco MM, Herfkens RJ, Dalman RL, Taylor CA. 2010. Quantification of hemodynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms during rest and exercise using magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics. Ann Biomed Eng. 38(4):1288–1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotz J, Meier C, Leppert A, Galanski M. 2002. Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: Basic Facts and Implementation. Radiographics. 22(3):651–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markl M, Bammer R, Alley MT, Elkins CJ, Draney MT, Barnett A, Moseley ME, Glover GH, Pelc NJ. 2003. Generalized reconstruction of phase contrast MRI: analysis and correction of the effect of gradient field distortions. Magn Reson Med. 50(4):791–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markl M, Frydrychowicz A, Kozerke S, Hope M, Wieben O. 2012. 4D flow MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 36(5):1015–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyre S, Pedersen EM, Ringgaard S, Boesiger P, Paaske WP. 1997. In vivo wall shear stress measured by magnetic resonance velocity mapping in the normal human abdominal aorta. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 13(3):263–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña Pérez N. Windkessel modeling of the human arterial system. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Piccinelli M, Vergara C, Antiga L, Forzenigo L, Biondetti P, Domanin M. 2013. Impact of hemodynamics on lumen boundary displacements in abdominal aortic aneurysms by means of dynamic computed tomography and computational fluid dynamics. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 12(6):1263–1276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirola S, Cheng Z, Jarral OA, O'Regan DP, Pepper JR, Athanasiou T, Xu XY. 2017. On the choice of outlet boundary conditions for patient-specific analysis of aortic flow using computational fluid dynamics. J Biomech. 60:15–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safian RD, Textor SC. 2001. Renal–artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 344(6):431–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott RAP, Wilson NM, Ashton HA, Kay DN. 1993. Is surgery necessary for abdominal aortic aneurysm less than 6 cm in diameter? Lancet. 342(8884):1395–1396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soudah E, Ng EYK, Loong TH, Bordone M, Pua U, Narayanan S. 2013. CFD modelling of abdominal aortic aneurysm on hemodynamic loads using a realistic geometry with CT. Comput Math Methods Med. 2013:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srichai MB, Lim RP, Wong S, Lee VS. 2009. Cardiovascular applications of phase-contrast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 192(3):662–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalder AF, et al. 2011. Patient specific hemodynamics: combined 4D flow-sensitive MRI and CFD. In: Wittek A, Nielsen P, Miller K. (Eds.), Computational Biomechanics for Medicine, pp. 27–38. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sugiyama M, Takehara Y, Kawate M, Ooishi N, Terada M, Isoda H, Sakahara H, Naganawa S, Johnson KM, Wieben O, et al. 2020. Optimal plane selection for measuring post-prandial blood flow increase within the superior mesenteric artery: analysis using 4D flow and computational fluid dynamics. MRMS. 19(4):366–374.
   Google Scholar
• Suh G-Y, Les AS, Tenforde AS, Shadden SC, Spilker RL, Yeung JJ, Cheng CP, Herfkens RJ, Dalman RL, Taylor CA, et al. 2011. Hemodynamic changes quantified in abdominal aortic aneurysms with increasing exercise intensity using MR exercise imaging and image-based computational fluid dynamics. Ann Biomed Eng. 39(8):2186–2202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang BT, Cheng CP, Draney MT, Wilson NM, Tsao PS, Herfkens RJ, Taylor CA. 2006. Abdominal aortic hemodynamics in young healthy adults at rest and during lower limb exercise: quantification using image-based computer modeling. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 291(2):H668–H676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Updegrove A, Wilson NM, Merkow J, Lan H, Marsden AL, Shadden SC. 2017. Simvascular: an open source pipeline for cardiovascular simulation. Ann Biomed Eng. 45(3):525–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Pelt R, Nguyen H, ter Haar Romeny B, Vilanova A. 2012. Automated segmentation of blood-flow regions in large thoracic arteries using 3D-cine PC-MRI measurements. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 7(2):217–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignon-Clementel IE, Alberto Figueroa C, Jansen KE, Taylor CA. 2006. Outflow boundary conditions for three-dimensional finite element modeling of blood flow and pressure in arteries. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 195(29–32):3776–3796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiallourou TI, Kröger JR, Stergiopulos N, Maintz D, Martin BA, Bunck AC. 2012. Comparison of 4D phase-contrast MRI flow measurements to computational fluid dynamics simulations of cerebrospinal fluid motion in the cervical spine. PloS One. 7(12):e52284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yim PJ, Cebral JR, Weaver A, Lutz RJ, Soto O, Vasbinder GBC, Ho VB, Choyke PL. 2004. Estimation of the differential pressure at renal artery stenoses. Magn Reson Med. 51(5):969–977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar