Leaflet stress quantification of porcine vs bovine surgical bioprostheses: an in vitro study

References

• Anselmi A, Flécher E, Ruggieri VG, Harmouche M, Langanay T, Corbineau H, Verhoye J-P, Leguerrier A. 2014. Long-term results of the Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis in the aortic position. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg. 147(6):1884–1891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselmi A, Ruggieri VG, Lelong B, Flecher E, Corbineau H, Langanay T, Verhoye J-P, Leguerrier A. 2017. Mid-term durability of the Trifecta bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg. 153:21–28.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balachandran K, Sucosky P, Jo H, Yoganathan AP. 2009. Elevated cyclic stretch alters matrix remodeling in aortic valve cusps: implications for degenerative aortic valve disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 296:H756–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm PJ, Lung B, Lancellotti P, Lansac E, Rodriguez Muñoz D, ESC Scientific Document Group, et al. 2017. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 38(36):2739–2791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bavaria JE, Desai ND, Cheung A, Petracek MR, Groh MA, Borger MA, Schaff HV. 2014. The St Jude Medical Trifecta aortic pericardial valve: results from a global, multicenter, prospective clinical study. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg. 147:590–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campisi S, Camilleri L, Innorta A, Azarnoush K. 2014. Early failures of Trifecta aortic bioprosthesis. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg. 148:e133–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie GW. 1992. Computer modelling of bioprosthetic heart valves. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 6(Suppl 1):S95–100; discussion S101.
   Google Scholar
• Colin L. 2017. Mechanical characterization and numerical modeling of aortic valve tissues. PSL Research University. Thesis. English. ⟨NNT : 2017PSLEM069⟩. ⟨tel-02127058⟩
   Google Scholar
• David TE, Armstrong S, Maganti M. 2010. Hancock II bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: the gold standard of bioprosthetic valves durability? Ann Thoracic Surg. 90:775–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David TE, Feindel CM, Bos J, Ivanov J, Armstrong S. 2008. Aortic valve replacement with Toronto SPV bioprosthesis: Optimal patient survival but suboptimal valve durability. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg. 135:19–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hart J, Peters GWM, Schreurs PJG, Baaijens FPT. 2003. A three-dimensional computational analysis of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic valve. J Biomech. 36:103–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong YL, Pan B. 2017. A review of speckle pattern fabrication and assessment for digital image correlation. Exp Mech. 57(8):1161–1181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas PS, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Svensson LG, Webb JG, Hahn RT, Pibarot P, Weissman NJ, Miller DC, Kapadia S, for the PARTNER Trial Investigators, et al. 2017. Longitudinal hemodynamics of transcatheter and surgical aortic valves in the PARTNER Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2:1197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvir D, Bourguignon T, Otto CM, Hahn RT, Rosenhek R, Webb JG, Treede H, Sarano ME, Feldman T, Wijeysundera HC, et al. 2018. Standardized definition of structural valve degeneration for surgical and transcatheter bioprosthetic aortic valves. Circulation. 137:388–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason T, Reardon M, Popma J, Lee J, Kleiman N, Chetcuti S, Deeb GM. 2018. TCT-13 5-year outcomes from the randomized Corevalve US Pivotal High Risk Trial: final results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 72(13):B6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman S, Cheung A, Bavaria JE, Petracek MR, Groh MA, Schaff HV. 2017. Midterm, multicenter clinical and hemodynamic results for the Trifecta aortic pericardial valve. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg. 153:561–569.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenzinger R, Fiegl K, Wottke M, Lange RS. 2015. Twenty-seven-year experience with the St. Jude Medical Biocor bioprosthesis in the aortic position. Ann Thoracic Surg. 100:2220–2226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamamoto M, Kobayashi T, Ozawa M, Yoshimura K. 2017. Pure cusp tear of trifecta bioprosthesis 2 years after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg. 23:157–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haziza F, Papouin G, Barratt-Boyes B, Christie G, Whitlock R. 1996. Tears in bioprosthetic heart valve leaflets without calcific degeneration. J Heart Valve Dis. 5:35–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heide-Jørgensen S, Kumaran Krishna S, Taborsky J, Bechsgaard T, Zegdi R, Johansen P. 2016. A novel method for optical high spatiotemporal strain analysis for transcatheter aortic valves in vitro. Trans ASME J Biomech Eng. 138:034504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishihara T, Ferrans VJ, Boyce SW, Jones M, Roberts WC. 1981. Structure and classification of cuspal tears and perforations in porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves implanted in patients. Am J Cardiol. 48:665–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston DR, Soltesz EG, Vakil N, Rajeswaran J, Roselli EE, Sabik JF, Smedira NG, Svensson LG, Lytle BW, Blackstone EH. 2015. Long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves: implications from 12,569 implants. Ann Thoracic Surg. 99(4):1239–1247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaneyuki D, Nakajima H, Asakura T, Yoshitake A, Tokunaga C, Tochii M, Hayashi J, Takazawa A, Izumida H, Iguchi A. 2020. Early first-generation trifecta valve failure: a case series and a review of the literature. Ann Thoracic Surg. 109(1):86–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikinis R, Pieper SD, Vosburgh KG. 2014. 3D slicer: a platform for subject-specific image analysis, visualization, and clinical support. In: Jolesz FA, editor. Intraoperative imaging and image-guided therapy. New York, NY: Springer; p. 277–289.
   Google Scholar
• Lee C-H, Amini R, Gorman RC, Gorman JH, Sacks MS. 2014. An inverse modeling approach for stress estimation in mitral valve anterior leaflet valvuloplasty for in-vivo valvular biomaterial assessment. J Biomech. 47:2055–2063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters RG, Walley VM, Pipe AL, Keon WJ. 1995. Long-term experience with the Lonescu–Shiley pericardial valve. Ann Thoracic Surg. 60:S288–S91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucotelli J-P, Bertrand PC, Loisance DY. 1995. Durability of the mitroflow pericardial valve at ten years. Ann Thoracic Surg. 60:S303–S4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller JD, Weiss RM, Heistad DD. 2011. Calcific aortic valve stenosis: methods, models, and mechanisms. Circ Res. 108:1392–1412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nistal F, García-Satué E, Artiñano E, Duran CMG, Gallo I. 1986. Comparative study of primary tissue valve failure between Lonescu–Shiley pericardial and Hancock porcine valves in the aortic position. Am J Cardiol. 57(1):161–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto CM, Valve D. 2000. Timing of aortic valve surgery. Heart. 84:211–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Permanyer E, Estigarribia A-J, Ysasi A, Herrero E, Semper O, Llorens R. 2013. St. Jude Medical Trifecta aortic valve perioperative performance in 200 patients. Interactive Cardiovasc Thoracic Surg. 17(4):669–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piñón M, Durán D, Pazos P, Pradas G. 2015. Leaflet tear in a Trifecta aortic bioprosthesis 34 months after implantation. Interact Cardiovasc Thoracic Surg. 20:281–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranga A, Bouchot O, Mongrain R, Ugolini P, Cartier R. 2006. Computational simulations of the aortic valve validated by imaging data: evaluation of valve-sparing techniques. Interact Cardiovasc Thoracic Surg. 5:373–378.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Remadi J-P, Levy F, Szymanski C, Nzomvuama A, Zogheib E, Gun M, Tribouilloy C. 2014. Early hemodynamics results of aortic valve replacement with the new St Jude Trifecta bioprosthesis. Int J Cardiol. 174:755–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riess F-C, Cramer E, Hansen L, Schiffelers S, Wahl G, Wallrath J, Winkel S, Kremer P. 2010. Clinical results of the Medtronic mosaic porcine bioprosthesis up to 13 years. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 37:145–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salaun E, Mahjoub H, Girerd N, Dagenais F, Voisine P, Mohammadi S, Yanagawa B, Kalavrouziotis D, Juni P, Verma S, et al. 2018. Rate, timing, correlates, and outcomes of hemodynamic valve deterioration after bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 138(10):971–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreier H, Orteu J-J, Sutton MA. 2009. Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements. Boston, MA: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Sigüenza J, Pott D, Mendez S, Sonntag SJ, Kaufmann TAS, Steinseifer U, Nicoud F. 2018. Fluid–structure interaction of a pulsatile flow with an aortic valve model: a combined experimental and numerical study. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng. 34:e2945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søndergaard L, Ihlemann N, Capodanno D, Jørgensen TH, Nissen H, Kjeldsen BJ, Chang Y, Steinbrüchel DA, Olsen PS, Petronio AS, et al. 2019. Durability of transcatheter and surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves in patients at lower surgical risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 73(5):546–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanová V, Zenses A, Thollon L, Kadem L, Barragan P, Rieu R, Pibarot P. 2020. Effects of hemodynamic conditions and valve sizing on leaflet bending stress in self‐expanding transcatheter aortic valve: an in‐vitro study. Artif Org. 44(7):E277-E287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein PD, Kemp SR, Riddle JM, Lee MW, Lewis JW, Magilligan DJ. 1985. Relation of calcification to torn leaflets of spontaneously degenerated porcine bioprosthetic valves. Ann Thoracic Surg. 40:175–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun W. 2005. Simulated bioprosthetic heart valve deformation under quasi-static loading. Trans ASME J Biomech Eng. 127:905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szeto K, Pastuszko P, Álamo J. d, Lasheras J, Nigam V. 2013. Bicuspid aortic valves experience increased strain as compared to tricuspid aortic valves. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 4(4):362–366.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanné D, Bertrand E, Kadem L, Pibarot P, Rieu R. 2010. Assessment of left heart and pulmonary circulation flow dynamics by a new pulsed mock circulatory system. Exp Fluids. 48(5):837–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thubrikar MJ, Deck JD, Aouad J, Nolan SP. 1983. Role of mechanical stress in calcification of aortic bioprosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 86:115–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesely I. 2000. Aortic root dilation prior to valve opening explained by passive hemodynamics. J Heart Valve Dis. 9:16–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler M, Hwai Yap C, Balachandran K, Padala M, Yoganathan AP. 2011. Regional analysis of dynamic deformation characteristics of native aortic valve leaflets. J Biomech. 44:1459–1465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing Y, Warnock JN, He Z, Hilbert SL, Yoganathan AP. 2004. Cyclic pressure affects the biological properties of porcine aortic valve leaflets in a magnitude and frequency dependent manner. Ann Biomed Eng. 32(11):1461–1470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida K, Fukunaga N, Sakon Y, Koyama T. 2016. Early failure of trifecta bioprosthesis in the aortic position: early failure of trifecta bioprosthesis. J Cardiac Surg. 31:526–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Eggleton CD, Arola DD. 2002. Evaluating the mechanical behavior of arterial tissue using digital image correlation. Exp Mech. 42(4):409–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar