Estimation of coronary stenosis severity based on flow distribution ratios

References

• Acrivos A, Babcock BD, Pigford RL. 1959. Flow distributions in manifolds. Chem Eng Sci. 10(1–2):112–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ADINA R&D. 2005. Theory and modeling guide, Volume III: ADINA CFD & FSI. Vol. Report ARD 05-9. Watertown, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Andreini D, Modolo R, Katagiri Y, Mushtaq S, Sonck J, Collet C, De Martini S, Roberto M, Tanaka K, Miyazaki Y, SYNTAX III REVOLUTION Investigators, et al. 2019. Impact of fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography on heart team treatment decision-making in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: insights from the SYNTAX III REVOLUTION trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interven. 12(12):e007607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berne Rm, Levy Mn. 1986. Cardiovascular Physiology. St-Louis, Toronto: Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• Bom MJ, Driessen RS, Stuijfzand WJ, Raijmakers PG, Van Kuijk CC, Lammertsma AA, van Rossum AC, van Royen N, Knuuti J, Mäki M, et al. 2019. Diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient for the presence of ischemia as defined by fractional flow reserve and quantitative positron emission tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 12(2):323–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Q, Broersen A, Kitslaar PH, Lelieveldt BP, Dijkstra J. 2019. A model-guided method for improving coronary artery tree extractions from CCTA images. Int J Cars. 14(2):373–383.
   Google Scholar
• Choi J-H, Min JK, Labounty TM, Lin FY, Mendoza DD, Shin DH, Ariaratnam NS, Koduru S, Granada JF, Gerber TC. 2011. Intracoronary transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary CT angiography for determining coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imag. 4(11):1149–1157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choy JS, Kassab GS. 2008. Scaling of myocardial mass to flow and morphometry of coronary arteries. J Appl Physiol (1985). 104(5):1281–1286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet C, Onuma Y, Sonck J, Asano T, Vandeloo B, Kornowski R, Tu S, Westra J, Holm NR, Xu B, et al. 2018. Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 39(35):3314–3321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon WF, Achenbach S, Engstrom T, Assali A, Shlofmitz R, Jeremias A, Fournier S, Kirtane AJ, Kornowski R, Greenberg G, For the FAST-FFR Study Investigators, et al. 2019. Accuracy of fractional flow reserve derived from coronary angiography. Circulation. 139(4):477–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formaggia L, Quarteroni A, Veneziani A. 2010. Cardiovascular mathematics: modeling and simulation of the circulatory system. Vol. 1. Milan: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Freidoonimehr N, Arjomandi M, Sedaghatizadeh N, Chin R, Zander A. 2020. Transitional turbulent flow in a stenosed coronary artery with a physiological pulsatile flow. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 36(7):e3347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdsworth D, Drangova M, Fenster A. 1999. Quantitative angiographic blood-flow measurement using pulsed intra-arterial injection. Med Phys. 26(10):2168–2175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeremias A, Stone GW. 2015. Fractional flow reserve for the evaluation of coronary stenoses: limitations and alternatives. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 85(4):602–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamenskiy AV, MacTaggart JN, Pipinos II, Gupta PK, Dzenis YA. 2013. Hemodynamically motivated choice of patch angioplasty for the performance of carotid endarterectomy. Ann Biomed Eng. 41(2):263–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassab GS. 2006. Scaling laws of vascular trees: of form and function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 290(2):H894–H903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawaji T, Shiomi H, Higami H, Taylor C, Kimura T. 2016. Real-world feasibility of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography (Real-FFRCT) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 67(13):1665–1665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirişli HA, Schaap M, Metz CT, Dharampal AS, Meijboom WB, Papadopoulou SL, Dedic A, Nieman K, de Graaf MA, Meijs MFL, et al. 2013. Standardized evaluation framework for evaluating coronary artery stenosis detection, stenosis quantification and lumen segmentation algorithms in computed tomography angiography. Med Image Anal. 17(8):859–876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkeeide RL. 1991. Coronary obstructions, morphology and physiologic significance. In Quantitative coronary arteriography (pp. 229–244). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kishi S, Giannopoulos AA, Tang A, Kato N, Chatzizisis YS, Dennie C, Horiuchi Y, Tanabe K, Lima JAC, Rybicki FJ, et al. 2018. Fractional flow reserve estimated at coronary CT angiography in intermediate lesions: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of different methods to determine coronary flow distribution. Radiology. 287(1):76–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klabunde R. 2011. Cardiovascular physiology concepts. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins/Baltimore, 2005 (1st edition) and 2012 (2nd edition). A textbook for medical and allied health science students.
   Google Scholar
• Koo B-K, Erglis A, Doh J-H, Daniels DV, Jegere S, Kim H-S, Dunning A, DeFrance T, Lansky A, Leipsic J, et al. 2011. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms: results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 58(19):1989–1997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornowski R, Vaknin-Assa H. 2017. Case report of first angiography-based on-line FFR assessment during coronary catheterization. Case Rep Cardiol. 2017:6107327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Wang W, Mao B, Liu Y. 2019. A method to personalize the lumped parameter model of coronary artery. Int J Comput Methods. 16(03):1842004.
   Google Scholar
• Li G, Wang H, Zhang M, Tupin S, Qiao A, Liu Y, Ohta M, Anzai H. 2021. Prediction of 3D Cardiovascular hemodynamics before and after coronary artery bypass surgery via deep learning. Commun Biol. 4(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min JK, Taylor CA, Achenbach S, Koo BK, Leipsic J, Nørgaard BL, Pijls NJ, De Bruyne B. 2015. Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography: Clinical data and scientific principles. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 8(10):1209–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsouras D, Sewatkar R, Giannopoulos AA, Agrawal M, George E, Cheezum MK, Shanbhag S, Blankstein R, Chen MY, Rybicki FJ. 2015. Abstract 14608: non-invasive derivation of resting coronary artery flow directly from CT angiography (CTA) via the transluminal attenuation gradient (TAG) in leftversus right-dominant circulation. Circulation. 132(suppl_3):A14608–A14608.
   Google Scholar
• Molloi S, Wong JT. 2007. Regional blood flow analysis and its relationship with arterial branch lengths and lumen volume in the coronary arterial tree. Phys Med Biol. 52(5):1495–1503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno C, Bhaganagar K. 2013. Modeling of stenotic coronary artery and implications of plaque morphology on blood flow. Modell Simul Eng. 2013:1–14. (Article ID 390213).
   Google Scholar
• Morris PD, Gunn JP. 2017. Computing fractional flow reserve from invasive coronary angiography: Getting closer. e005806.
   Google Scholar
• Nickisch H, Lamash Y, Prevrhal S, Freiman M, Vembar M, Goshen L, Schmitt H. 2015. Learning patient-specific lumped models for interactive coronary blood flow simulations 2015. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention; Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pellicano M, Lavi I, De Bruyne B, Vaknin-Assa H, Assali A, Valtzer O, Lotringer Y, Weisz G, Almagor Y, Xaplanteris P, et al. 2017. Validation study of image-based fractional flow reserve during coronary angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Interven. 10(9):e005259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochitte CE, George RT, Chen MY, Arbab-Zadeh A, Dewey M, Miller JM, Niinuma H, Yoshioka K, Kitagawa K, Nakamori S, et al. 2014. Computed tomography angiography and perfusion to assess coronary artery stenosis causing perfusion defects by single photon emission computed tomography: the CORE320 study. Eur Heart J. 35(17):1120–1130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiler C, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. 1992. Basic structure-function relations of the epicardial coronary vascular tree. Basis of quantitative coronary arteriography for diffuse coronary artery disease. Circulation. 85(6):1987–2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaknovich A. 1994. Complications of coronary stenting. Coron Artery Dis. 5(7):583–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalman E, Barak C, Dgany E, Noskowitcz H, Einav S, Rosenfeld M. 2001. Pressure-based simultaneous CFR and FFR measurements: understanding the physiology of a stenosed vessel. Comput Biol Med. 31(5):353–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shpilfoygel SD, Close RA, Valentino DJ, Duckwiler GR. 2000. X-ray videodensitometric methods for blood flow and velocity measurement: a critical review of literature . Med Phys. 27(9):2008–2023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakol M, Ashraf S, Brener SJ. 2012. Risks and complications of coronary angiography: a comprehensive review. Glob J Health Sci. 4(1):65–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK. 2013. Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 61(22):2233–2241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, von Birgelen C, Ferrara A, Pellicano M, Nef H, Tebaldi M, Murasato Y, Lansky A. 2016. Diagnostic accuracy of fast computational approaches to derive fractional flow reserve from diagnostic coronary angiography: the international multicenter FAVOR pilot study. JACC Cardiovasc Interven. 9(19):2024–2035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Hoef TP, Echavarría-Pinto M, van Lavieren MA, Meuwissen M, Serruys PW, Tijssen JG, Pocock SJ, Escaned J, Piek JJ. 2015. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of coronary flow capacity: a comprehensive cross-modality physiological concept in ischemic heart disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interven. 8(13):1670–1680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Hoef TP, van Lavieren MA, Damman P, Delewi R, Piek MA, Chamuleau SA, Voskuil M, Henriques JP, Koch KT, de Winter RJ. 2014. Physiological basis and long-term clinical outcome of discordance between fractional flow reserve and coronary flow velocity reserve in coronary stenoses of intermediate severity. Circ Cardiovasc Interven. 7(3):301–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong DTL, Ko BS, Cameron JD, Nerlekar N, Leung MCH, Malaiapan Y, Crossett M, Leong DP, Worthley SG, Troupis J, et al. 2013. Transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary computed tomography angiography is a novel noninvasive approach to the identification of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 61(12):1271–1279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamir M. 2006. The physics of coronary blood flow. Boston, MA: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Zarins CK, Zatina MA, Giddens DP, Ku DN, Glagov S. 1987. Shear stress regulation of artery lumen diameter in experimental atherogenesis. J Vasc Surg. 5(3):413–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zreik M, van Hamersvelt RW, Khalili N, Wolterink JM, Voskuil M, Viergever MA, Leiner T, Išgum I. 2020. Deep learning analysis of coronary arteries in cardiac CT angiography for detection of patients requiring invasive coronary angiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 39(5):1545–1557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar