Inverse optimal control to model human trajectories during locomotion

References

• Arechavaleta G, Laumond J, Hicheur H, Berthoz A. 2008. An optimality principle governing human walking. IEEE Trans Robot. 24(1):5–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arechavaleta G, Laumond JP, Hicheur H, Berthoz A. 2001. The nonholonomic nature of human locomotion: A modeling study. In: Proceeding of the IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robots and Biomechatronics. 2006(2):158–163.
   Google Scholar
• Arechavaleta G, Laumond JP, Hicheur H, Berthoz A. 2008. On the nonholonomic nature of human locomotion. Auton Robot. 25(1/2):25–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basili P, Sağlam M, Kruse T, Huber M, Kirsch A, Glasauer S. 2013. Strategies of locomotor collision avoidance. Gait Posture. 37(3):385–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biess A, Liebermann D, Flash T. 2007. A computational model for redundant human three-dimensional pointing movements: Integration of independent spatial and temporal motor plans simplifies movement dynamics. J Neurosci. 27(48):13045–13064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovi G, Rabuffetti M, Mazzoleni P, Ferrarin M. 2011. A multiple-task gait analysis approach: kinematic, kinetic and emg reference data for healthy young and adult subjects. Gait Posture. 33(1):6–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbanhawi M, Simic M, Jazar R. 2015. Continuous path smoothing for car-like robots using b-spline curves. J Intell Robot Syst. 80(S1):23–56.
   Google Scholar
• Flash T, Hogan N. 1985. The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci. 5(7):1688–1703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gard C, Miff C, Kuo A. 2004. Comparison of kinematic and kinetic methods for computing the vertical motion of the body center of mass during walking. In: Human Movement Science. 22(6):597–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijnen M, Muir BC, Rietdyk S. 2012. Factors leading to obstacle contact during adaptive locomotion. Exp Brain Res. 223(2):219–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Bertram JEA. 2018. Compliant walking appears metabolically advantageous at extreme step lengths. Gait Posture. 64:84–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koilias A, Nelson MG, Anagnostopoulos CN, Mousas C. 2020. Immersive walking in a virtual crowd: The effects of the density, speed, and direction of a virtual crowd on human movement behavior. Comput Anim Virtual Worlds. 31(6):e1928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosuge K, Yoshida H, Fukuda T. 1993. Dynamic control for robot-human collaboration. In: Proceedings of 1993 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication. 398–401.
   Google Scholar
• Laumond JP. 1998. Robot motionplanning and control. In: Lectures notes in control and information sciences, vol. 229. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Maroger I, Stasse O, Watier B. 2020a. Comparison of human experimental trajectories and simulations during gait. Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. 23(sup1):S189–S191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroger I, Stasse O, Watier B. 2020b. Walking human trajectory models and their application to humanoid robot locomotion. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Las Vegas (USA).
   Google Scholar
• Mastalli C, Budhiraja R, Merkt W, Saurel G, Hammoud B, Naveau M. 2020. Crocoddyl: An efficient and versatile framework for multi-contact optimal control. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.
   Google Scholar
• Mombaur K, Laumond JP, Truong A. 2009. An inverse optimal control approach to human motion modeling. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; vol. 70. p. 451–468.
   Google Scholar
• Mombaur K, Truong A, Laumond JP. 2010. From human to humanoid locomotion—an inverse optimal control approach. Auton Robot. 28(3):369–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandi GC, Semwal VB, Raj M, Jindal A. 2016. Modeling bipedal locomotion trajectories using hybrid automata. In: 2016 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON). 1013–1018.
   Google Scholar
• Panchea A, Ramdani N, Bonnet V, Fraisse P. 2018. Human arm motion analysis based on the inverse optimization approach. 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob), 2018 p. 1005–1010.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos A, Bascetta L, Ferretti G. 2013. Generation of human walking paths. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tokyo, Japan; 11.
   Google Scholar
• Park T, Levine S. 2013. Inverse optimal control for humanoid locomotion, Robotics Science and Systems Workshop on Inverse Optimal Control & Robotic Learning from Demonstration.
   Google Scholar
• Powell MJD. 1964. An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives. Comp J. 7(2):155–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raković M, Savić S, Santos-Victor J, Nikolić M, Borovac B. 2019. Human-inspired online path planning and biped walking realization in unknown environment. Front Neurorobot. 13:36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semwal VB, Kumar C, Mishra PK, Nandi GC. 2018. Design of vector field for different subphases of gait and regeneration of gait pattern. IEEE Trans Automat Sci Eng. 15(1):104–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan TB. 2016. Human-Robot Interaction: Status and Challenges. Hum Factors. 58(4):525–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soueres P, Laumond J. 1996. Shortest paths synthesis for a car-like robot. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 41(5):672–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasse O, et al. 2017. Talos: A new humanoid research platform targeted for industrial applications. In: IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robotics. p. 689–695.
   Google Scholar
• Sylla N, Bonnet V, Venture G, Armande N, Fraisse P. 2014. Human arm optimal motion analysis in industrial screwing task. Paper presented at the 5th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. Sao Paulo, Brazil; p. 964–969.
   Google Scholar
• Tassa Y, Mansard N, Todorov E. 2014. Control-limited differential dynamic programming. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Hong Kong, China.
   Google Scholar
• Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE, Haberland M, Reddy T, Cournapeau D, Burovski E, Peterson P, Weckesser W, Bright J, SciPy 1.0 Contributors, et al. 2020. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nat Methods. 17(3):261–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viviani P, Flash T. 1995. Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 21(1):32–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Ren D, Fan M, Qian D, Li X, Xia H. 2020. Robust trajectory forecasting for multiple intelligent agents in dynamic scene. CoRR. abs/2005.13133.
   Google Scholar