Biomechanical specimen assessment by low dose biplanar X-ray study of fusion constructions using a posterior lumbar cage with integrated anchors and posterior adjunctive fixators

References

• Beaubien BP, Mehbod AA, Kallemeier PM, Lew WD, Buttermann GR, Transfeldt EE, Wood KB. 2004. Posterior augmentation of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive fixation versus pedicle screws in vitro. Spine. 29(19):E406–E412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia NN, Lee KH, Bui CN, Luna M, Wahba GM, Lee TQ. 2012. Biomechanical evaluation of an expandable cage in single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. 37(2):E79–E85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher HH. 1959. A method of spinal fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 41-B(2):248–259.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Buchowski JM, Daubs MD, Kim Y, Baldus C. 2007. Adjacent segment disease followinglumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 32(20):2253–2257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen MH, Chen JY. 2017. A Novel Non pedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. BioMed Res Int. :5619350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen DJ, Yao C, Song Q, Tang B, Liu X, Zhang B, Dai M, Nie T, Wan Z. 2018. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the treatment of low lumbar degenerative disc diseases: Analysis of clinical and radiographic results. World Neurosurg. 115:e516–e522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin KR, Reis MT, Reyes PM, Newcomb AG, Neagoe A, Gabriel JP, Sung RD, Crawford NR. 2015. Stability of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the setting of retained facets and posterior fixation using transfacet or standard pedicle screws. Spine J. 15(5):1077–1082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esses SI, Sachs BL, Dreyzin V. 1993. Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)). 18(15):2231–2239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A, Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. 2001. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine. Study Group. Spine. 26(23):2521–2534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaume M, Persohn S, Vergari C, Glorion C, Skalli W, Miladi L. 2020. Biomechanical cadaver study of proximal fixation in a minimally invasive bipolar construct. Spine Deform. 8(1):33–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerber M, Crawford NR, Chamberlain RH, Fifield MS, LeHuec JC, Dickman CA. 2006. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw- plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model. Spine. 31(7):762–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgi H, Prebet R, Andriantsimiavona R, Tropiano P, Blondel B, Parent HF. 2018. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UNILIF): morbidity, clinical and radiological 2-year outcomes of a 66-patient prospective series. Eur Spine J. 27(8):1933–1939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms JG, Jeszenszky D. 1998. Die posteriore, lumbale, interkorporelle Fusion in unilateraler transforaminaler Technik. Orthop Traumatol. 10(2):90–102.
   Google Scholar
• Heo Y, Park JH, Seong HY, Lee YS, Jeon SR, Rhim SC, Roh SW. 2015. Symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration at the L3-4 level after fusion surgery at the L4-5 level: evaluation of the risk factors and 10-year incidence. Eur Spine J. 24(11):2474–2480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humbert L, De Guise JA, Aubert B, Godbout B, Skalli W. 2009. 3D reconstruction of the spine from biplanar X-rays using parametric models based on transversal and longitudinal inferences. Med Eng Phys. 31(6):681–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaibara T, Karahalios DG, Porter RW, Kakarla UK, Reyes PM, Choi SK, Yaqoobi AS, Crawford NR. 2010. Biomechanics of a lumbar interspinous anchor with transforaminal lumbar interbody fixation. World Neurosurg. 73(5):572–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiler A, Schmoelz W, Erhart S, Gnanalingham K. 2014. Primary stiffness of a modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with integrated screw fixation: cadaveric biomechanical study. Spine. 39(17):E994–E1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Bak KH, Chun HJ, Oh SJ, Kang TH, Yang MS. 2012. Posterior interspinous fusion device for one-level fusion in degenerative lumbar spine disease: comparison with pedicle screw fixation - preliminary report of at least one year follow up. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 52(4):359–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornblum MB, Turner AW, Cornwall GB, Zatushevsky MA, Phillips FM. 2013. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone lumbar polyether-ether-ketone interbody cage with integrated screws. Spine J. 13(1):77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korovessis P, Papazisis Z, Koureas G, Lambiris E. 2004. Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results. Spine. 29(7):735–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotil K, Ali Akçetin M, Savaş Y. 2013. Clinical and radiologic outcomes of TLIF applications with or without pedicle screw: a double center prospective pilot comparative study. J Spin Disord Tech. 26(7):359–366.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lequin MB, Verbaan D, Bouma GJ. 2014. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with stand-alone Trabecular Metal cages for repeatedly recurrent lumbar disc herniation and back pain. SPI. 20(6):617–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muth-Seng C, Brauge D, Soriau N, Sandoz B, Van den Abbeele M, Skalli W, Laporte S. 2019. Experimental analysis of the lower cervical spine in flexion with a focus on facet tracking. J Biomech. 93:220–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlov PW, Meijers H, van Limbeek J, Jacobs WC, Lemmens JA, Obradov-Rajic M, de Kleuver M. 2004. Good outcome and restoration of lordosis after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with additional posterior fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)). 29(17):1893–1900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan K, Leung V, Scherman DB, Tan AR, Rao PJ, Mobbs RJ. 2016. Bilateral versus unilateral instrumentation in spinal surgery: Systematic review and trial sequential analysis of prospective studies. J Clin Neurosci. 30:15–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling C, Pfeiffer M, Grupp TM, Blömer W, Rohlmann A. 2014. The effect of design parameters of interspinous implants on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study. Eur Spine J. 23(4):762–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soriano-Baron H, Newcomb AGUS, Malhotra D, Palma AE, Jr, Martinez-Del-Campo E, Crawford NR, Theodore N, Kelly BP, Kaibara T. 2018. Biomechanical Analysis of an Expandable Lumbar Interbody Spacer. World Neurosurg. 114:e616–e623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Techy F, Mageswaran P, Colbrunn RW, Bonner TF, McLain RF. 2013. Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study. Spine J. 13(5):572–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Kelft E, Van Goethem J. 2015. Trabecular metal spacers as standalone or with pedicle screw augmentation, in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Eur Spine J. 24(11):2597–2606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilke HJ, Wenger K, Claes L. 1998. Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants. Eur Spine J. 7(2):148–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou C, Cha T, Wang W, Guo R, Li G. 2021. Investigation of Alterations in the Lumbar Disc Biomechanics at the Adjacent Segments After Spinal Fusion Using a Combined In Vivo and In Silico Approach. Ann Biomed Eng. 49(2):601–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar