Finite element study on the influence of pore size and structure on stress shielding effect of additive manufactured spinal cage

References

• Alvarez K, Nakajima H. 2009. Metallic scaffolds for bone regeneration. Materials. 2(3):790–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambati DV, Wright EK, Jr, Lehman RA, Jr, Kang DG, Wagner SC, Dmitriev AE. 2015. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study. Spine J. 15(8):1812–1822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM F2077: Testing intervertebral body fusion devices. 2020. [accessed 2020 Sep 9]. https://www.element.com/nucleus/2019/11/21/19/25/astm-f2077-testing-ibfds#:∼:text=ASTM%20F2077%20is%20the%20standard,properties%20of%20intervertebral%20spinal%20implants.
   Google Scholar
• Barth E, Ronningen H, Solheim LF, Saethren B. 1986. Bone ingrowth into weight-bearing porous fiber titanium implants. Mechanical and biochemical correlations. J Orthop Res. 4(3):356–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, Weatherly GC. 1980. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res. 150:263–270.
   Google Scholar
• Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ. 1999. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 81-B(5):907–914.
   Google Scholar
• Bonfield W, Wang M, Tanner K. 1998. Interfaces in analogue biomaterials. Acta Mater. 46(7):2509–2518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J-H, Liu C, You L, Simmons CA. 2010. Boning up on Wolff's Law: mechanical regulation of the cells that make and maintain bone. J Biomech. 43(1):108–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi J, Shin D-A, Kim S. 2017. Biomechanical effects of the geometry of ball-and-socket artificial disc on lumbar spine: a finite element study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 42(6):E332–E339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi K-C, Ryu K-S, Lee S-H, Kim YH, Lee SJ, Park C-K. 2013. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: stand-alone interbody cage versus interbody cage with pedicle screw fixation - a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 14(1):220–229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chosa E, Goto K, Totoribe K, Tajima N. 2004. Analysis of the effect of lumbar spine fusion on the superior adjacent intervertebral disk in the presence of disk degeneration, using the three-dimensional finite element method. Clin Spine Surg. 17(2):134–139.
   Google Scholar
• Chuah HG, Rahim IA, Yusof MI. 2010. Topology optimisation of spinal interbody cage for reducing stress shielding effect. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 13(3):319–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemow AJT, Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ, Koeneman J, Anderson J. 1981. Interface mechanics of porous titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 15(1):73–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook SD, Walsh KA, Haddad RJ. 1985. Interface mechanics and bone-growth into porous Co-Cr-Mo alloy implants. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res. 193:271–280.
   Google Scholar
• Epasto G, Distefano F, Mineo R, Guglielmino E. 2019. Subject-specific finite element analysis of a lumbar cage produced by electron beam melting. Med Biol Eng Comput. 57(12):2771–2781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• fe-safe 2019 FATIGUE THEORY REFERENCE: Dassault Systemes. pp. 123–176. [Online]. Available: https://help.3ds.com/2019/English/DSSIMULIA_Established/FesafeFatigueTheoryPdf/FesafeFatigueTheory.pdf. [Accessed 2020 Feb 26].
   Google Scholar
• Frosch K-H, Barvencik F, Viereck V, Lohmann CH, Dresing K, Breme J, Brunner E, Stürmer KM. 2004. Growth behavior, matrix production, and gene expression of human osteoblasts in defined cylindrical titanium channels. J Biomed Mater Res. 68A(2):325–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel V, Monroe B, Gilbertson L, Brinckmann P. 1995. Interlaminar shear stresses and laminae separation in a disc: finite element analysis of the L3-L4 motion segment subjected to axial compressive loads. Spine. 20(6):689–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grauer JN, Biyani A, Faizan A, Kiapour A, Sairyo K, Ivanov A, Ebraheim NA, Patel TC, Goel VK. 2006. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination. Spine J. 6(6):659–666.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Spinal System 510(k)s. 2020. [accessed 2020 Sep 9]. https://www.fda.gov/media/71604/download.
   Google Scholar
• Haibo H, Huiqun L, Jieen Danqing W, Shang F, Wuling S. 2012. Research progress of biomedical porous titanium and its alloys. Mater Rev. 26(19):262–270.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera A, Yánez A, Martel O, Afonso H, Monopoli D. 2014. Computational study and experimental validation of porous structures fabricated by electron beam melting: a challenge to avoid stress shielding. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 45:89–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann AA, Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN. 1997. Progression of human bone ingrowth into porous-coated implants. Rate of bone ingrowth in humans. Acta Orthop Scand. 68(2):161–166. 1997/01/01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huiskes R, Weinans H, Van Rietbergen B. 1992. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res. 274:124–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itälä AI, Ylänen HO, Ekholm C, Karlsson KH, Aro HT. 2001. Pore diameter of more than 100 microm is not requisite for bone ingrowth in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res. 58(6):679–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junchao L, Yanyan Z, Wei W. 2016. Elastic modulus and stress analysis of porous titanium parts fabricated by selective laser melting. J Harbin Inst Technol. 23:46–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kanayama M, Cunningham BW, Haggerty CJ, Abumi K, Kaneda K, McAfee PC. 2000. In vitro biomechanical investigation of the stability and stress-shielding effect of lumbar interbody fusion devices. J Neurosurg. 93(2 Suppl):259–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H-J, Kang K-T, Chang B-S, Lee C-K, Kim J-W, Yeom JS. 2014. Biomechanical analysis of fusion segment rigidity upon stress at both the fusion and adjacent segments: a comparison between unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation. Yonsei Med J. 55(5):1386–1394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K-T, Lee S-H, Suk K-S, Lee J-H, Jeong B-O. 2010. Biomechanical changes of the lumbar segment after total disc replacement: charite(r), prodisc(r) and maverick(r) using finite element model study. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 47(6):446–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurutz M. 2010. Finite element modelling of human lumbar spine. Finite Element Analysis 209–236. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/11994.
   Google Scholar
• Lee Y-H, Chung C-J, Wang C-W, Peng Y-T, Chang C-H, Chen C-H, Chen Y-N, Li C-T. 2016. Computational comparison of three posterior lumbar interbody fusion techniques by using porous titanium interbody cages with 50% porosity. Comput Biol Med. 71:35–45..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Jiang W, Yan J, Hu K, Han Z, Wang B, Zhao Y, Cui G, Wang Z, Mao K, et al. 2019. A novel 3D printed cage with microporous structure and in vivo fusion function. J Biomed Mater Res A. 107(7):1386–1392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melikyan ML, Itin VI. 2002. Dynamics of bone tissue mineralization in porous titanium and the mechanical properties of a titanium-bone tissue composite. Tech Phys Lett. 28(8):673–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow J. 1968. Fatigue properties of metals. In: Richard C. Rice (Ed.), Fatigue design handbook; p. 21–30. USA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Pannell WC, Savin DD, Scott TP, Wang JC, Daubs MDJTSJ. 2015. Trends in the surgical treatment of lumbar spine disease in the United States. 15(8):1719–1727.
   Google Scholar
• Ramakrishna S, Mayer J, Wintermantel E, Leong KW. 2001. Biomedical applications of polymer-composite materials: a review. Compos Sci Technol. 61(9):1189–1224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi-Adl A, Ahmed AM, Shrivastava SC. 1986. Mechanical response of a lumbar motion segment in axial torque alone and combined with compression, (in Eng). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 11(9):914–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock JT. 2018. Wolff's law (bone functional adaptation). In: Wenda Trevathan, Matt Cartmill, Darna L. Dufour, Clark Spencer Larsen, Dennis H. O'Rourke, Karen Rosenberg, Karen B. Strier (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of biological anthropology. p. 1–2. USA: Wiley Online Library.
   Google Scholar
• Taniguchi N, Fujibayashi S, Takemoto M, Sasaki K, Otsuki B, Nakamura T, Matsushita T, Kokubo T, Matsuda S. 2016. Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: an in vivo experiment. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 59:690–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuruga E, Takita H, Itoh H, Wakisaka Y, Kuboki Y. 1997. Pore size of porous hydroxyapatite as the cell-substratum controls BMP-induced osteogenesis. J Biochem. 121(2):317–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadapalli S, Sairyo K, Goel VK, Robon M, Biyani A, Khandha A, Ebraheim NA. 2006. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-a finite element study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 31(26):E992–E998.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu S-H, Li Y, Zhang Y-Q, Li X-K, Yuan C-F, Hao Y-L, Zhang Z-Y, Guo Z. 2013. Porous titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium cage has better osseointegration and less micromotion than a poly-ether-ether-ketone cage in sheep vertebral fusion. Artif Organs. 37(12):E191–E201. [24147953]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Z, Wang L, Gong H, Zhu D. 2012. Biomechanical evaluation of three surgical scenarios of posterior lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis. Biomed Eng Online. 11(1):31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A, Young P. 2015. Ti-6Al-4V triply periodic minimal surface structures for bone implants fabricated via selective laser melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 51:61–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang QH, Zhou YL, Petit D, Teo EC. 2009. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of a dynamic stabilization device on disc loading under compression. Med Eng Phys. 31(5):533–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Li H, Fogel GR, Liao Z, Li Y, Liu W. 2018. Biomechanical analysis of porous additive manufactured cages for lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis. World Neurosurg. 111:e581–e591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Sun Y, Sun X, Li Y, Liao Z, Liu W. 2016. Recent advances in finite element applications in artificial lumbar disc replacement. JBiSE. 09(10):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong Z-C, Wei S-H, Wang J-P, Feng C-K, Chen C-S, Yu C-h. 2006. Finite element analysis of the lumbar spine with a new cage using a topology optimization method. Med Eng Phys. 28(1):90–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Zhong W, Zhang P, Liu X, Huang J, Liu F, Li J. 2020. Biomechanical evaluation of autologous bone-cage in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 21(1):379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar