Influence of fiber insertion and different material type on stress distribution in endocrown restorations: a 3D-FEA study

References

• Andre CB, Aguiar TR, Ayres APA, Ambrosano GMB, Giannini M. 2013. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dry and moist dentin. Braz Oral Res. 27(5):389–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausiello P, Ciaramella S, Martorelli M, Lanzotti A, Zarone F, Watts DC, Gloria A. 2017. Mechanical behavior of endodontically restored canine teeth: effects of ferrule, post material and shape. Dent Mater. 33(12):1466–1472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausiello P, Ciaramella S, R, Di A, Lanzotti A, Ventre M, Watts DC. 2019. Adhesive class I restorations in sound molar teeth incorporating combined resin-composite and glass ionomer materials: CAD-FE modeling and analysis. Dent Mater. 35 (10):1514–1522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausiello P, Gloria A, Maietta S, Watts DC, Martorelli M. 2020. Stress distributions for hybrid composite endodontic post designs with and without a ferrule: FEA study. Polymers (Basel). 12(8):1836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bankoğlu Güngör M, Turhan Bal B, Yilmaz H, Aydin C, Karakoca Nemli S. 2017. Fracture strength of CAD/CAM fabricated lithium disilicate and resin nano ceramic restorations used for endodontically treated teeth. Dent Mater J. 36(2):135–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belli S, Erdemir A, Yildirim C. 2006. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques. Int Endod J. 39(2):136–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biacchi GR, Basting RT. 2012. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Oper Dent. 37(2):130–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang YH, Lin WH, Kuo WC, Chang CY, Lin CL. 2009. Mechanical interactions of cuspal-coverage designs and cement thickness in a cusp-replacing ceramic premolar restoration: a finite element study. Med Biol Eng Comput. 47(4):367–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Cunha LF, Gonzaga CC, Pissaia JF, Correr GM. 2017. Lithium silicate endocrown fabricated with a CAD-CAM system: a functional and esthetic protocol. J Prosthet Dent. 118(2):131–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca G. F d, Piva AMD, Tribst JP, Borges AL. 2018. Influence of restoration height and masticatory load orientation on ceramic endocrowns. J Contemp Dent Pract. 19(9):1052–1057.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dal Piva AMO, Tribst JPM, Borges ALS, Souza ROAE, Bottino MA. 2018. CAD-FEA modeling and analysis of different full crown monolithic restorations. Dent Mater. 34(9):1342–1350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalkılıç E, Kazak M, Hisarbeyli D, Fildisi MA, Donmez N, D, Arısu H. 2019. Can fiber application affect the fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth restored with a low viscosity bulk-fill composite? Biomed Res Int. 2019:3126931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejak B, Młotkowski A, Langot C. 2012. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of molars with thin-walled prosthetic crowns made of various materials. Dent Mater. 28(4):433–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejak B, Młotkowski A. 2013. 3D Finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation. Dent Mater. 29(12):309–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi F. 2012. Finite element analysis- new trends and developments. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech.
   Google Scholar
• El-Damanhoury HM, Haj-Ali RN, Platt JA. 2015. Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CAD-CAM blocks. Oper. Dent. 40(2):201–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eraslan Ö, Eraslan O, Eskitaşcıoğlu G, Belli S. 2011. Conservative restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolar teeth: a FEM study . Clin Oral Investig. 15(3):403–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskitascioglu G, Belli S, Kalkan M. 2002. Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis). J Endod. 28(9):629–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etemad-Shahidi Y, Qallandar OB, Evenden J, Alifui-Segbaya F, Ahmed KE. 2020. Accuracy of 3-Dimensionally Printed Full-Arch Dental Models: A Systematic Review. JCM. 9(10):3357.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mocci F, Mason PN. 2000. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of posts. Am J Dent. 13:9–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fill, T. S., Carey, J. P., Toogood, R. W., & Major, P. W. (2011). Experimentally determined mechanical properties of, and models for, the periodontal ligament: critical review of current literature. Journal of dental biomechanics, 2011, 312980. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/312980.
   Google Scholar
• Firidinoğlu K, Toksavul S, Toman M, Sarikanat M, Nergiz İ. 2012. Fracture resis- tance and analysis of stress distribution of implant-supported single zirco- nium ceramic coping combination with abutments made of different materials. J Appl Biomech. 28(4):394–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galyan G, Padda BK, Kaur TP, Sharma M, Kapur I, Kaur S. 2019. Fracture resistance of nanocomposite and fiber reinforced composite with different cavity designs used for restoring obliquely fractured incisal edge. J Contemp Dent Pract. 20(5):566–570.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ganesh M, Tandon S. 2006. Versatility of ribbond in contemporary dental practice. Trends Biomater Artif Organs. 20:53–58.
   Google Scholar
• Gloria A, Maietta S, Martorelli M, Lanzotti A, Watts DC, Ausiello P. 2018. FE analysis of conceptual hybrid composite endodontic post designs in anterior teeth. Dent Mater. 34(7):1063–1071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govare N, Contrepois M. 2020. Endocrowns: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 123(3):411–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurbuz T, Sengul F, Altun C. 2008. Finite element stress analysis of short-post core and over restorations prepared with different restorative materials. Dent Mater J. 27(4):499–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes DC, Diaz-Arnold AM, Leary JM. 1996. Influence of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 75(2):140–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hshad ME, Dalkılıç EE, Ozturk GC, Dogruer I, Koray F. 2018. Influence of different restoration techniques on fracture resistance of root-filled teeth: in vitro investigation. Oper Dent. 43(2):162–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang BH, Son K, Lee KB. 2020. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners and two laboratory scanners for a complete arch: a comparative in vitro study. Appl. Sci. 10(1):74.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus B, Jordan R, Abrams L. 1969. Dental anatomy and occlusion. Vol. 197 Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins Co., 223–262.
   Google Scholar
• Lin CL, Chang YH, Liu PR. 2008. Multi-factorial analysis of a cusp replacing adhesive premolar restoration: a finite element study. J Dentistry. 36(3):194–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CL, Chang YH, Pai CA. 2011. Evaluation of failure risks in ceramic restorations for endodontically treated premolar with MOD preparation. Dent Mater. 27(5):431–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedrollo Lise D, Van Ende A, De Munck J, Umeda Suzuki TY, Cardoso Vieira LC, Van Meerbeek B. 2017. Biomechanical behavior ofendodontically treated premolars using differentpreparation designs and CAD/CAM materials. J Dent. 59:54–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magne P, Carvalho AO, Bruzi G, Anderson RE, Maia H, Giannini M. 2014. Influence of no-ferrule and no-post buildup design on the fatigue resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with resin nanoceramic CAD/CAM crowns. Oper Dent. 39(6):595–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magne P, Knezevic A. 2009. Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD/CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars. Quintessence Int. 40(2):125–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magne P, Schlichting LH, Maia HP, Baratieri LN. 2010. In vitro fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic posterior occlusal veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 104(3):149–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, Logozzo S. 2017. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: A review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health. 17(1):149.
   Google Scholar
• Mena-Álvarez J, Agustín-Panadero R, Zubizarreta-Macho A. 2020. Effect of Fiber-Reinforced Composite and Elastic Post on the Fracture Resistance of Premolars with Root Canal Treatment—An In Vitro Pilot Study. Appl Sci. 10(21):7616.
   Google Scholar
• Mormann WH, Bindl A, Luthy H. 1998. Effects of preparation and luting system on all ceramic computer generated crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 11:333–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira JS, Chaves CAL, Silva-Sousa YTC, Gomes EA. 2014. The finite element methods on oral rehabilitation: New trend for endodontically treated teeth. BDS. 17(3):11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Papa J, Cain C, Messer HH. 1994. Moisture content of vital vs endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol. 10(2):91–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. 1989. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod. 15(11):512–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees JS. 2001. An investigation into the importance of the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone as supporting structures in finite element studies. J Oral Rehabil. 28(5):425–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocca GT, Rizcalla N, Krejci I. 2013. Fiber-reinforced resin coating for endocrown preparations: a technical report. Oper Dent. 38(3):242–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocca GT, Sedlakova P, Saratti CM, Sedlacek R, Gregor L, Rizcalla N. 2016. Fatigue behavior of resin-modified monolithic CAD-CAM RNC crowns and endocrowns. Dent Mater. 32(12):338–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudo DN, Karbhari VM. 1999. Physical behaviors of fiber reinforcement as applied to tooth stabilization. Dent Clin North Am. 43(1):7–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sengun A, Cobankara FK, Orucoglu H. 2008. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Traumatol. 24(2):214–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toksavul S, Zor M, Toman M, Güngör MA, Nergiz I, Artunç C. 2006. Analysis of dentinal stress distribution of maxillary central incisors subjected to various post-and-core applications. Oper Dent. 31(1):89–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toparli M, Gokay N, Aksoy T. 1999. Analysis of a restored maxillary second premolar tooth by using three-dimensional finite element method. J Oral Rehabil. 26(2):157–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribst JPM, Dal Piva A. M d O, Madruga CFL, Valera MC, Borges ALS, Bresciani E, de Melo RM. 2018. Endocrown restorations: influence of dental remnant and restorative material on stress distribution. Dent Mater. 34(10):1466–1473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribst JPM, D, Piva AMDO, de Jager N, Bottino MA, de Kok P, Kleverlaan CJ. 2021. Full-crown versus endocrown approach: a 3D-analysis of both restorations and the effect of Ferrule and restoration material. J Prosthodont. 30(4):335–344.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vukicevic AM, Zelic K, Jovicic G, Djuric M, Filipovic N. 2015. Influence of dental restorations and mastication loadings on dentine fatigue behaviour: image-based modelling approach. J Dent. 43(5):556–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakabayashi N, Ona M, Suzuki T, Igarashi Y. 2008. Nonlinear finite element analyses: advances and challenges in dental applications. J Dent. 36(7):463–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendler M, Belli R, Petschelt A, Mevec D, Harrer W, Lube T, Danzer R, Lohbauer U. 2017. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 2: flexural strength testing. Dent Mater. 33(1):99–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaman SD, Sahin M, Aydin C. 2003. Finite element analysis of strength characteristics of various resin based restorative materials in Class V cavities. J Oral Rehabil. 30(6):630–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamanel K, Caglar A, Gulsahi K, Ozden UA. 2009. A “Effects of different ceramic and composite materials on stress distribution in inlay and onlay cavities: 3D finite element analysis. Dental Mater J. 28(6):661–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang HS, Lang LA, Molina A, Felton DA. 2001. The effects of dowel design and load direction on dowel-and-core restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 85(6):558–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh CJ. 1997. Fatigue root fracture: a spontaneous root fracture in non-endodontically treated teeth. Br Dent J. 182(7):261–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarone F, Mauro DIM, Ausiello P, Ruggiero G, Sorrentino R. 2019. Current status on lithium disilicate and zirconia: a narrative review. BMC Oral Health. 19(1):134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Rong Q, Wang X, Gao X. 2017. Influence of remaining tooth structure and restorative material type on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: A finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 117(5):646–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Wang D, Rong Q, Qian J, Wang X. 2020. Effect of central retainer shape and abduction angle during preparation of teeth on dentin and cement layer stress distributions in endocrown-restored mandibular molars. Dent Mater J. 39(3):464–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar