Changes of adjacent segment biomechanics after anterior cervical interbody fusion with different profile design plate: single- versus double-level

References

• Arnold PM, Friis EA. 2015. Editorial: Biomechanical effects of interspinous process devices using a hybrid testing protocol. J Neurosurg Spine. 23(2):197–198; discussion 198–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basques BA, Louie PK, Mormol J, Khan JM, Movassaghi K, Paul JC, Varthi A, Goldberg EJ, An HS. 2018. Multi- versus single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparing sagittal alignment, early adjacent segment degeneration, and clinical outcomes. Eur Spine J. 27(11):2745–2753.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen Y, Chen H, Cao P, Yuan W. 2015. Anterior cervical interbody fusion with the Zero-P spacer: mid-term results of two-level fusion. Eur Spine J. 24(8):1666–1672.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheung ZB, Gidumal S, White S, Shin J, Phan K, Osman N, Bronheim R, Vargas L, Kim JS, Cho SK. 2019. Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a stand-alone interbody cage versus a conventional cage-plate technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Spine J. 9(4):446–455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costi JJ, Ledet EH, O'Connell GD. 2021. Spine biomechanical testing methodologies: The controversy of consensus vs scientific evidence. JOR Spine. 4(1):e1138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goel VK, Grauer JN, Patel T, Biyani A, Sairyo K, Vishnubhotla S, Matyas A, Cowgill I, Shaw M, Long R, et al. 2005. Effects of charité artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 30(24):2755–2764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffin J, van Loon J, Van Calenbergh F, Plets C. 1995. Long-term results after anterior cervical fusion and osteosynthetic stabilization for fractures and/or dislocations of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord. 8(6):500–508; discussion 499.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrod CC, Hilibrand AS, Fischer DJ, Skelly AC. 2012. Adjacent segment pathology following cervical motion-sparing procedures or devices compared with fusion surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 37(22 Suppl):S96–S112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hashimoto K, Aizawa T, Kanno H, Itoi E. 2019. Adjacent segment degeneration after fusion spinal surgery-a systematic review. Int Orthop. 43(4):987–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH. 1999. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 81:519–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain M, Natarajan RN, Fayyazi AH, Braaksma BR, Andersson GB, An HS. 2009. Screw angulation affects bone-screw stresses and bone graft load sharing in anterior cervical corpectomy fusion with a rigid screw-plate construct: a finite element model study. Spine J. 9(12):1016–1023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji GY, Oh CH, Shin DA, Ha Y, Kim KN, Yoon DH, Yudoyono F. 2015. Stand-alone cervical cages versus anterior cervical plates in 2-level cervical anterior interbody fusion patients: analysis of adjacent segment degeneration. J Spinal Disord Techniq. 28(7):E433–E438.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kang DG, Wagner SC, Tracey RW, Cody JP, Gaume RE, Lehman RA Jr. 2017. Biomechanical stability of a stand-alone interbody spacer in two-level and hybrid cervical fusion constructs. Global Spine J. 7(7):681–688.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee SH, Im YJ, Kim KT, Kim YH, Park WM, Kim K. 2011. Comparison of cervical spine biomechanics after fixed- and mobile-core artificial disc replacement: a finite element analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 36(9):700–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder A. 2000. A new mathematical neck model for a low-velocity rear-end impact dummy: evaluation of components influencing head kinematics. Accid Anal Prev. 32(2):261–269.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu VM, Mobbs RJ, Fang B, Phan K. 2019. Clinical outcomes of locking stand-alone cage versus anterior plate construct in two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. Eur Spine J. 28(1):199–208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malakoutian M, Volkheimer D, Street J, Dvorak MF, Wilke HJ, Oxland TR. 2015. Do in vivo kinematic studies provide insight into adjacent segment degeneration? A qualitative systematic literature review. Eur Spine J. 24(9):1865–1881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miura T, Panjabi MM, Cripton PA. 2002. A method to simulate in vivo cervical spine kinematics using in vitro compressive preload. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 27(1):43–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nayak AN, Stein MI, James CR, Gaskins RB III, Cabezas AF, Adu-Lartey M, Castellvi AE, Santoni BG. 2014. Biomechanical analysis of an interbody cage with three integrated cancellous lag screws in a two-level cervical spine fusion construct: an in vitro study. Spine J. 14(12):3002–3010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panjabi MM. 2007. Hybrid multidirectional test method to evaluate spinal adjacent-level effects. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 22(3):257–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasarn ML, Baria D, Milne E, Latta L, Sukovich W. 2012. Adjacent-level biomechanics after single versus multilevel cervical spine fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 16(2):172–177.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reis MT, Reyes PM, Crawford NR. 2014. Biomechanical assessment of anchored cervical interbody cages: comparison of 2-screw and 4-screw designs. Neurosurgery. 10(3):412–417; discussion 417.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scholz M, Reyes PM, Schleicher P, Sawa AG, Baek S, Kandziora F, Marciano FF, Crawford NR. 2009. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices. Spine. 34(2):156–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scholz M, Schleicher P, Pabst S, Kandziora F. 2015. A zero-profile anchored spacer in multilevel cervical anterior interbody fusion: biomechanical comparison to established fixation techniques. Spine. 40(7):E375–E380.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith GW, Robinson RA. 1958. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 40-A(3):607–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein MI, Nayak AN, Gaskins RB III, Cabezas AF, Santoni BG, Castellvi AE. 2014. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct. Spine J. 14(1):128–136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun Z, Liu Z, Hu W, Yang Y, Xiao X, Wang X. 2018. Zero-profile versus cage and plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a minimum 2 years of follow-up: a meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 120:e551–e561.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tchako A, Sadegh AM. 2009. Stress changes in intervertebral discs of the cervical spine due to partial discectomies and fusion. J Biomech Eng. 131(5):051013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Volkheimer D, Malakoutian M, Oxland TR, Wilke HJ. 2015. Limitations of current in vitro test protocols for investigation of instrumented adjacent segment biomechanics: critical analysis of the literature. Eur Spine J. 24(9):1882–1892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Zhao H, Liu JM, Chao R, Chen TB, Tan LW, Zhu F, Zhao JH, Liu P. 2017. Biomechanics of anterior plating failure in treating distractive flexion injury in the caudal subaxial cervical spine. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 50:130–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wheeldon JA, Pintar FA, Knowles S, Yoganandan N. 2006. Experimental flexion/extension data corridors for validation of finite element models of the young, normal cervical spine. J Biomech. 39(2):375–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Kumaresan S, Pintar FA. 2000. Geometric and mechanical properties of human cervical spine ligaments. J Biomech Eng. 122(6):623–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Kumaresan S, Pintar FA. 2001. Biomechanics of the cervical spine Part 2. Cervical spine soft tissue responses and biomechanical modeling. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 16(1):1–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Stemper BD, Wolfla CE, Shender BS, Paskoff G. 2007. Level-dependent coronal and axial moment-rotation corridors of degeneration-free cervical spines in lateral flexion. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 89:1066–1074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Stemper BD, Pintar FA, Baisden JL, Shender BS, Paskoff G. 2008. Normative segment-specific axial and coronal angulation corridors of subaxial cervical column in axial rotation. Spine. 33:490–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigler JE, Rogers RW, Ohnmeiss DD. 2016. Comparison of 1-level versus 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical and radiographic follow-up at 60 months. Spine. 41(6):463–469.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar