A method of classification decision based on multi-BiLSTMs for physical loads hierarchy

References

• Akhavian R, Behzadan AH. 2016. Smartphone-based construction workers' activity recognition and classification. Autom Constr. 71:198–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aminian K, Najafi B, Büla C, Leyvraz P-F, Robert P. 2002. Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured by an ambulatory system using miniature gyroscopes. J Biomech. 35(5):689–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand R, Mehrotra K, Mohan CK, Ranka S. 1995. Efficient classification for multiclass problems using modular neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 6(1):117–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Antwi-Afari MF, Li H. 2018. Fall risk assessment of construction workers based on biomechanical gait stability parameters using wearable insole pressure system. Adv Eng Inf. 38:683–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antwi-Afari MF, Li H, Seo J, Wong AYL. 2018. Automated detection and classification of construction workers' loss of balance events using wearable insole pressure sensors. Autom Constr. 96:189–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagala F, Becker C, Cappello A, Chiari L, Aminian K, Hausdorff JM, Zijlstra W, Klenk J. 2012. Evaluation of accelerometer-based fall detection algorithms on real-world falls. PLoS One. 7(5):e37062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann JH, Mayagoitia RE, Smith IC. 2009. A portable system for collecting anatomical joint angles during stair ascent: A comparison with an optical tracking device. Dyn Med. 8(1):3–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen K, Trkov M, Yi J, Zhang Y, Liu T, Song D. 2015. A robotic bipedal model for human walking with slips. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Coley B, Najafi B, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Aminian K. 2005. Stair climbing detection during daily physical activity using a miniature gyroscope. Gait Posture. 22(4):287–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold JE, Park JS, Punnett L. 2006. Work routinization and implications for ergonomic exposure assessment. Ergonomics. 49(1):12–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8):1735–1780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L, Zheng J, Hu H. 2022. Online gait phase detection in complex environment based on distance and multi-sensors information fusion using inertial measurement units. Int J Soc Robot. 14(2):413–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrana Y, Xiang Y, Ali L, Abdul-Rauf Z. 2021. A bidirectional LSTM deep learning approach for intrusion detection. Expert Syst Appl. 185:115524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen D, Schollhorn WI, Newell KM, Jager JM, Rost F, Vehof K. 2011. Diagnosing fatigue in gait patterns by support vector machines and self-organizing maps. Hum Mov Sci. 30(5):966–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelsey JL, Githens PB, White AA, 3rd, Holford TR, Walter SD, O'Connor T, Ostfeld AM, Weil U, Southwick WO, Calogero JA. 1984. An epidemiologic study of lifting and twisting on the job and risk for acute prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc. J Orthop Res. 2(1):61–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knapik J, Harman E, Reynolds K. 1996. Load carriage using packs: A review of physiological, biomechanical and medical aspects. Appl Ergon. 27(3):207–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajewski KT, Dever DE, Johnson CC, Mi Q, Simpson RJ, Graham SM, Moir GL, Ahamed NU, Flanagan SD, Anderst WJ, et al. 2020. Load magnitude and locomotion pattern alter locomotor system function in healthy young adult women. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 8:582219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim S, D'Souza C. 2019. Statistical prediction of load carriage mode and magnitude from inertial sensor derived gait kinematics. Appl Ergon. 76:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marta G, Simona F, Andrea C, Dario B, Stefano S, Federico V, Marco B, Francesco B, Stefano M, Alessandra P. 2020. Wearable biofeedback suit to promote and monitor aquatic exercises: A feasibility study. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 69(4):1219–1231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathie MJ, Celler BG, Lovell NH, Coster AC. 2004. Classification of basic daily movements using a triaxial accelerometer. Med Biol Eng Comput. 42(5):679–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayagoitia RE, Nene AV, Veltink PH. 2002. Accelerometer and rate gyroscope measurement of kinematics: An inexpensive alternative to optical motion analysis systems. J Biomech. 35(4):537–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath ND, Chaspari T, Behzadan AH. 2018. Automated ergonomic risk monitoring using body-mounted sensors and machine learning. Adv Eng Inf. 38:514–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordóñez FJ, Roggen D. 2016. Deep convolutional and lstm recurrent neural networks for multimodal wearable activity recognition. Sensors. 16(1):115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshima Y, Kawaguchi K, Tanaka S, Ohkawara K, Hikihara Y, Ishikawa-Takata K, Tabata I. 2010. Classifying household and locomotive activities using a triaxial accelerometer. Gait Posture. 31(3):370–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcanlı AK, Baysal M. 2022. A novel Multi-LSTM based deep learning method for islanding detection in the microgrid. Electr Power Syst Res. 202:107574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu S, Zhao H, Jiang N, Wu D, Song G, Zhao H, Wang Z. 2022. Sensor network oriented human motion capture via wearable intelligent system. Int J Intellig Sys. 37(2):1646–1673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravi N, Dandekar N, Mysore P, Littman ML. 2005. Activity recognition from accelerometer data. In Aaai; Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts M, Talbot C, Kay A, Price M, Hill M. 2018. Changes in postural sway and gait characteristics as a consequence of anterior load carriage. Gait Posture. 66:139–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu J, Seo J, Jebelli H, Lee S. 2019. Automated action recognition using an accelerometer-embedded wristband-type activity tracker. J Constr Eng Manage. 145(1):04018114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatini AM, Martelloni C, Scapellato S, Cavallo F. 2005. Assessment of walking features from foot inertial sensing. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 52(3):486–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwickert L, Becker C, Lindemann U, Maréchal C, Bourke A, Chiari L, Helbostad JL, Zijlstra W, Aminian K, Todd C, et al. 2013. Fall detection with body-worn sensors. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 46(8):706–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi H, Zhao H, Liu Y, Gao W, Dou SC. 2019. Systematic analysis of a military wearable device based on a multi-level fusion framework: Research directions. Sensors (Basel). 19(12):2651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun F, Zang W, Gravina R, Fortino G, Li Y. 2020. Gait-based identification for elderly users in wearable healthcare systems. Inf Fusion. 53:134–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valero E, Sivanathan A, Bosche F, Abdel-Wahab M. 2016. Musculoskeletal disorders in construction: A review and a novel system for activity tracking with body area network. Appl Ergon. 54:120–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls C. 2001. Clinical kinesiology for physical therapist assistants. Phys Ther. 81(3):961.
   Google Scholar
• Wu G, Xue S. 2008. Portable preimpact fall detector with inertial sensors. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 16(2):178–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Ahn CR, Kim H. 2020. Deep learning-based classification of work-related physical load levels in construction. Adv Eng Inf. 45:101104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar