Design space exploration of flow diverter hydraulic resistance parameters in sidewall intracranial aneurysms

References

• Appanaboyina S, Mut F, Löhner R, Putman C, Cebral J. 2009. Simulation of intracranial aneurysm stenting: techniques and challenges. Computer Methods in Appl Mech Engin. 198(45–46):3567–3582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augsburger L, Farhat M, Reymond P, Fonck E, Kulcsar Z, Stergiopulos N, Rüfenacht DA. 2009. Effect of flow diverter porosity on intraaneurysmal blood flow. Klin Neuroradiol. 19(3):204–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augsburger L, Reymond P, Rufenacht DA, Stergiopulos N. 2011. Intracranial stents being modeled as a porous medium: flow simulation in stented cerebral aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng. 39(2):850–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebral JR, Castro MA, Putman CM, Alperin N. 2008. Flow–area relationship in internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Physiol Meas. 29(5):585–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebral J, Mut F, Raschi M, Scrivano E, Ceratto R, Lylyk P, Putman C. 2011. Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 32(1):27–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csippa B, Gyürki D, Závodszky G, Szikora I, Paál G. 2020. Hydrodynamic resistance of intracranial flow-diverter stents: measurement description and data evaluation. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 11(1):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csippa B, Závodszky G, Paál G, Szikora I. 2018. A new hypothesis on the role of vessel topology in cerebral aneurysm initiation. Comput Biol Med. 103:244–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czaja B, Závodszky G, Azizi Tarksalooyeh V, Hoekstra AG. 2018. Cell-resolved blood flow simulations of saccular aneurysms: effects of pulsatility and aspect ratio. J R Soc Interface. 15(146):20180485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandapat S, Mendez-Ruiz A, Martínez-Galdámez M, Macho J, Derakhshani S, Foa Torres G, Pereira VM, Arat A, Wakhloo AK, Ortega-Gutierrez S. 2021. Review of current intracranial aneurysm flow diversion technology and clinical use. J Neurointerv Surg. 13(1):54–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dazeo N, Dottori J, Boroni G, Larrabide I. 2018. A comparative study of porous medium CFD models for flow diverter stents: advantages and shortcomings. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 34(12):e3145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dazeo N, Dottori J, Boroni G, Narata AP, Larrabide I. 2020. Stenting as porous media in anatomically accurate geometries. A comparison of models and spatial heterogeneity. J Biomech. 110:109945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford MD, Hoi Y, Piccinelli M, Antiga L, Steinman DA. 2009. An objective approach to digital removal of saccular aneurysms: technique and applications. BJR. 82(special_issue_1):S55–S61.
   Google Scholar
• Frolov SV, Sindeev SV, Kirschke JS, Arnold P, Prothmann S, Liepsch D, Balasso A, Potlov A, Larrabide I, Kaczmarz S. 2018. CFD and MRI studies of hemodynamic changes after flow diverter implantation in a patient-specific model of the cerebral artery. Exp Fluids. 59(11):176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyürki D, Csippa B, Paál G, Szikora I. 2022. Impact of design and deployment technique on the hydrodynamic resistance of flow diverters: an in vitro experimental study. Clin Neuroradiol. 32(1):107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodis S, Ding YH, Dai D, Lingineni R, Mut F, Cebral J, Kallmes D, Kadirvel R. 2016. Relationship between aneurysm occlusion and flow diverting device oversizing in a rabbit model. J Neurointerv Surg. 8(1):94–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodis S, Uthamaraj S, Smith AL, Dennis KD, Kallmes DF, Dragomir-Daescu D. 2012. Grid convergence errors in hemodynamic solution of patient-specific cerebral aneurysms. J Biomech. 45(16):2907–2913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janiga G, Berg P, Beuing O, Neugebauer M, Gasteiger R, Preim B, Rose G, Skalej M, Thévenin D. 2013. Recommendations for accurate numerical blood flow simulations of stented intracranial aneurysms. Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering. 58(3):303–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Cekirge S, Fiorella D, Hanel RA, Jabbour P, Lopes D, Lylyk P, McDougall CG, Siddiqui A. 2017. Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies. J Neurosurg. 127(4):775–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulcsár Z, Augsburger L, Reymond P, Pereira VM, Hirsch S, Mallik AS, Millar J, Wetzel SG, Wanke I, Rüfenacht DA. 2012. Flow diversion treatment: intra-aneurismal blood flow velocity and WSS reduction are parameters to predict aneurysm thrombosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 154(10):1827–1834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabide I, Aguilar M, Morales H, Geers A, Kulcsár Z, Rüfenacht D, Frangi A. 2013. Intra-aneurysmal pressure and flow changes induced by flow diverters: relation to aneurysm size and shape. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 34(4):816–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabide I, Geers AJ, Morales HG, Aguilar ML, Rüfenacht DA. 2015. Effect of aneurysm and ICA morphology on hemodynamics before and after flow diverter treatment. J Neurointerv Surg. 7(4):272–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabide I, Geers AJ, Morales HG, Bijlenga P, Rüfenacht DA. 2016. Change in aneurysmal flow pulsatility after flow diverter treatment. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 50:2–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latt J, Malaspinas O, Kontaxakis D, Parmigiani A, Lagrava D, Brogi F, Belgacem MB, Thorimbert Y, Leclaire S, Li S, et al. 2021. Palabos: parallel Lattice Boltzmann Solver. Computers & Math Appl. 81:334–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhang M, Verrelli DI, Chong W, Ohta M, Qian Y. 2018. Numerical simulation of aneurysmal haemodynamics with calibrated porous-medium models of flow-diverting stents. J Biomech. 80:88–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo X, Meng Q, Ma X, Zhang Q, Yu H, Jing B, Liu H, Yan Q, Zhuo Z, Yang X, et al. 2018. Hemodynamic simulation of intracranial aneurysm growth with virtual silk stent implantation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 21(9):558–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mut F, Cebral J. 2012. Effects of flow-diverting device oversizing on hemodynamics alteration in cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 33(10):2010–2016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson P, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Wetzel S, Wanke I, Fiorella D. 2011. The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 32(1):34–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou C, Hou X, Duan CZ, Zhang X, Chong W, Qian Y. 2021. Flow diverter modeled as heterogeneous and anisotropic porous medium: simulation, experimental validation and case analysis. J Biomech. 123:110525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouared R, Larrabide I, Brina O, Bouillot P, Erceg G, Yilmaz H, Lovblad KO, Mendes Pereira V. 2016. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of flow reduction induced by flow-diverting stents in intracranial aneurysms: a patient-unspecific hemodynamics change perspective. J Neurointerv Surg. 8(12):1288–1293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paliwal N, Yu H, Xu J, Xiang J, Siddiqui AH, Yang X, Li H, Meng H. 2016. Virtual stenting workflow with vessel-specific initialization and adaptive expansion for neurovascular stents and flow diverters. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 19(13):1423–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccinelli M, Steinman DA, Hoi Y, Tong F, Veneziani A, Antiga L. 2012. Automatic neck plane detection and 3D geometric characterization of aneurysmal sacs. Ann Biomed Eng. 40(10):2188–2211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccinelli M, Veneziani A, Steinman DA, Remuzzi A, Antiga L. 2009. A framework for geometric analysis of vascular structures: application to cerebral aneurysms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 28(8):1141–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajah G, Narayanan S, Rangel-Castilla L. 2017. Update on flow diverters for the endovascular management of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurg Focus. 42(6):E2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinkel GJE, Djibuti M, Algra A, van Gijn J. 1998. Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. Stroke. 29(1):251–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarrami-Foroushani A, Lassila T, Frangi AF. 2017. Virtual endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: models and uncertainty. WIREs Mechanisms of Disease. 9(4):e1385.
   Google Scholar
• Sarrami-Foroushani A, Lassila T, MacRaild M, Asquith J, Roes KCB, Byrne JV, Frangi AF. 2021. In-silico trial of intracranial flow diverters replicates and expands insights from conventional clinical trials. Nat Commun. 12(1):3861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner T, Juvela S, Unterberg A, Jung C, Forsting M, Rinkel G, European Stroke Organization. 2013. European stroke organization guidelines for the management of intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis. 35(2):93–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szikora I, Paal G, Ugron A, Nasztanovics F, Marosfoi M, Berentei Z, Kulcsar Z, Lee W, Bojtar I, Nyary I. 2008. Impact of aneurysmal geometry on intraaneurysmal flow: A computerized flow simulation study. Neuroradiology. 50(5):411–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugron Á, Szikora I, Paál G. 2014. Measurement of flow diverter hydraulic resistance to model flow modification in and around intracranial aneurysms. Interv Med Appl Sci. 6(2):61–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yadollahi-Farsani H, Scougal E, Herrmann M, Wei W, Frakes D, Chong B. 2019. Numerical study of hemodynamics in brain aneurysms treated with flow diverter stents using porous medium theory. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 22(11):961–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Závodszky G, Csippa B, Paál G, Szikora I. 2020. A novel virtual flow diverter implantation method with realistic deployment mechanics and validated force response. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Engng. 36(6):e3340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Závodszky G, Paál G. 2013. Validation of a lattice Boltzmann method implementation for a 3D transient fluid flow in an intracranial aneurysm geometry. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 44:276–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wang Y, Kao E, Flórez-Valencia L, Courbebaisse G. 2019. Towards optimal flow diverter porosity for the treatment of intracranial aneurysm. J Biomech. 82:20–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar