Informatics guided FE design of bioactive titanium alloy/composite multi-layered dental implants

References

• Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. 1981. Osseointegrated titanium implants: requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 52(2):155–170. doi: 10.3109/17453678108991776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JA. 1995. An introduction to neural networks. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arifin A, Sulong AB, Muhamad N, Syarif J, Ramli MI. 2014. Material processing of hydroxyapatite and titanium alloy (HA/Ti) composite as implant materials using powder metallurgy: a review. Mater Des. 55:165–175. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asgharzadeh Shirazi H, Ayatollahi MR, Asnafi A. 2017. To reduce the maximum stress and the stress shielding effect around a dental implant–bone interface using radial functionally graded biomaterials. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 20(7):750–759. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2017.1299142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborti Nirupam. 2022. Data-driven evolutionary modeling in materials technology. United States: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla KK. 2012. Composite materials. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chicot D, Tricoteaux A, Lesage J, Leriche A, Descamps M, Rguiti-Constantin E. 2013. Mechanical properties of porosity-free beta tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) ceramic by sharp and spherical indentations. NJGC. 03(01):16–28. doi: 10.4236/njgc.2013.31004.
   Google Scholar
• Datta S, Chattopadhyay PP. 2013. Soft computing techniques in advancement of structural metals. Int Mater Rev. 58(8):475–504. doi: 10.1179/1743280413Y.0000000021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta S, Mahfouf M, Zhang Q, Chattopadhyay PP, Sultana N. 2016. Imprecise knowledge based design and development of titanium alloys for prosthetic applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 53:350–365. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta S, Zhang Q, Sultana N, Mahfouf M. 2013. Optimal design of titanium alloys for prosthetic applications using a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm. Mater and Manuf Process. 28(7):741–745. doi: 10.1080/10426914.2013.773020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb K. 2001. Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithm. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dommeti VK, Pramanik S, Roy S. 2022. Influence of hydroxyapatite composite coating on the textured surface of patient specific dental implant: an in silico 3D finite element study. Mech Adv Mater Struct. 1–9. doi: 10.1080/15376494.2022.2116760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fereiduni E, Balbaa M, Mahmoud D, Elbestawi M, Li G, Chen J, Yujing L. 2023. Processing of hydroxyapatite (HA)–Ti–6Al–4V composite powders via laser powder bed fusion (LPBF): effect of HA particle size and content on the microstructure and mechanical properties. J of Mater Res and Technol. 24:8766–8781. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.111.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg DE. 2008. Genetic algorithm in search, optimization and machine learning. Bengaluru India: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Guo AX, Cao B, Wang Z, Ma X, Cao SC. 2023. Fabricated high-strength, low-elastic modulus biomedical Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn alloy via powder metallurgy. Mater. 16(10):3845. doi: 10.3390/ma16103845.
   Google Scholar
• Han C, Wang Q, Song B, Li W, Wei Q, Wen S, Liu J, Shi Y. 2017. Microstructure and property evolutions of titanium/nano-hydroxyapatite composites in-situ prepared by selective laser melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 71:85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.02.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein MA, Azeem MA, Kumar AM, Saravanan S, Ankah N, Sorour AA. 2023. Design and processing of near-β Ti–Nb–Ag alloy with low elastic modulus and enhanced corrosion resistance for orthopedic implants. J of Mater Res and Technol. 24:259–273. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S. 2004. Neural networks-a classroom approach. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Manonmani R, Vinodhini SP, Venkatachalapathy B, Sridhar TM. 2018. Electrochemical, mechanical and osseointegration evaluation of NBPC-coated 316L SS by EPD. Surf Eng. 34(7):511–519. doi: 10.1080/02670844.2017.1341224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucalo M. 2015. Hydroxyapatite (Hap) for biomedical applications. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nandi AK, Deb K, Ganguly S, Datta S. 2012. Investigating the role of metallic fillers in particulate reinforced flexible mould material composites using evolutionary algorithms. Appl Soft Comput. 12(1):28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2011.08.059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niinomi M. 2003. Recent research and development in titanium alloys for biomedical applications and healthcare goods. Sci Technology of Adv Mater. 4(5):445–454. doi: 10.1016/j.stam.2003.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez E, Salinas L, Mendoza R, Guerrero ME, Oliva J, Mayta-Tovalino F. 2023. Osseointegration of dental implants in patients with congenital and degenerative bone disorders: a literature review. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 13(3):167–172. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_51_22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramchand SK, Seeman E. 2018. The influence of cortical porosity on the strength of bone during growth and advancing age. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 16(5):561–572. doi: 10.1007/s11914-018-0478-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy S, Das M, Chakraborty P, Biswas JK, Chatterjee S, Khutia N, Saha S, RoyChowdhury A. 2017. Optimal selection of dental implant for different bone conditions based on the mechanical response. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 19(2):11–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy S, Dey S, Khutia N, Chowdhury AR, Datta S. 2018. Design of patient specific dental implant using FE analysis and computational intelligence techniques. Appl Soft Comput. 65:272–279. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.01.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safi IN, Hussein BMA, Al-Shammari AM. 2022. Bio-hybrid dental implants prepared using stem cells with β-TCP-coated titanium and zirconia. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 52(3):242–257. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2006080304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahzamanian MM, Banerjee R, Dahotre NB, Srinivasa AR, Reddy JN. 2023. Analysis of stress shielding reduction in bone fracture fixation implant using functionally graded materials. Compos Struct. 321:117262. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shubhabrata D. 2016. Materials design using computational intelligence techniques. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sridhar TM. 2010. Nanobioceramic coatings for biomedical applications. Mater Technol. 25(3–4):184–195. doi: 10.1179/175355510X12723642365449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultana N, Sikdar S, Chattopadhyay PP, Datta S. 2014. Informatics based design of prosthetic Ti alloys. Mater. Technol. 29(sup1):B69–B75. doi: 10.1179/1753555713Y.0000000103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takakuwa O, Kawaragi Y, Soyama H. 2013. Estimation of the yield stress of stainless steel from the Vickers hardness taking account of the residual stress. JSEMAT. 3(4):262–268. doi: 10.4236/jsemat.2013.34035.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas KA, Dey S, Sultana N, Sarkar K, Datta S. 2020. Design of Ti composite with bioactive surface for dental implant. Mater Manuf Process. 35(6):643–651. doi: 10.1080/10426914.2020.1711927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vladescu A, Padmanabhan SC, Azem FA, Braic M, Titorencu I, Birlik I, Morris MA, Braic V. 2016. Mechanical properties and biocompatibility of the sputtered Ti doped hydroxyapatite. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 63:314–325. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaqoob K, Amjad I, Munir Awan MA, Liaqat U, Zahoor M, Kashif M. 2023. Novel method for the production of titanium foams to reduce stress shielding in implants. ACS Omega. 8(2):1876–1884. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c02340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar