Identifying groundwater end members by spatio-temporal isotopic and hydrogeochemical records

References

• Wester P, Hoogesteger J, Vincent L. Local IWRM organizations for groundwater regulation: the experiences of the Aquifer Management Councils (COTAS) in Guanajuato, Mexico. Nat Resour Forum. 2009;33(1):29–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2009.01206.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrera J, Vázquez-Suñé E, Castillo O, et al. A methodology to compute mixing ratios with uncertain end members. Water Resour Res. 2004;40:W12101. doi: 10.1029/2003WR002263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Casique E. Mixing of groundwaters with uncertain end members: case study in the Tepalcingo-Axochiapan aquifer, Mexico. Hydrogeol J. 2012;20(3):605–613. doi: 10.1007/s10040-011-0826-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubau I, Vázquez-Suñé E, Jurado A, et al. Using EMMA and MIX analysis to assess mixing ratios and to identify hydrochemical reactions in groundwater. Sci Total Environ. 2013;470:1120–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkänen P, Löffman J, Koskinen L, et al. Application of mass-balance and flow simulation calculations to interpretation of mixing at Äspö, Sweden. Appl Geochem. 1999;14:893–905. doi: 10.1016/S0883-2927(99)00025-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojiambo BS, Poreda RJ, Lyons WB. Ground water/surface water interaction in Lake Naivasha, Kenya, using δ18O, δD, and 3H/3He age dating. Ground Water. 2001;39:526–533. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2001.tb02341.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer LN, Busenberg E, Drenkard S. Flow of river water into a karstic limestone aquifer: 2. dating the young fraction in groundwater mixtures in the Upper Floridian aquifer near Valdosta, Georgia. Appl Geochem. 1998;13(8):1017–1043. doi: 10.1016/S0883-2927(98)00032-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stute M, Deak J, Revesz K, et al. Tritium/3He dating of river infiltration: an example from the Danube in the Szigetkoz area, Hungary. Ground Water. 1997;35:905–911. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1997.tb00160.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joerin C, Beven KJ, Iorgulescu I, et al. Uncertainty in hydrograph separations based on geochemical mixing models. J Hydrol. 2002;255:90–106. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00509-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Suñé E, Carrera J, Tubau I, et al. An approach to identify urban groundwater recharge. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2010;14(10):2085–2097. doi: 10.5194/hess-14-2085-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Geological Survey (BGS). 1996. Effects of wastewater reuse on urban resources of León, México. CAN, SAPAL, BGS, Technical Report WD/95/64.
   Google Scholar
• SAPAL (Sistema de Agua Potable y Alcantarillado de León). 2012. Siembra de agua de lluvia en las zonas serrana y urbana del municipio de León, Guanajuato. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos-Leal JA, Durazo J, González-Moran T, et al. Evidencias hidrogeoquímicas de mezcla de flujos regionales en el acuífero de la Muralla, Guanajuato. Rev Mex Cienc Geol. 2007;24(3):293–305. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Horst A, Mahlknecht J, Merkel BJ. Estimating groundwater mixing and origin in an overexploited aquifer in Guanajuato, Mexico, using stable isotopes (strontium-87, carbon-13, deuterium and oxygen-18). Isot Environ Health Stud. 2007;43(4):323–338. doi: 10.1080/10256010701701756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horst A, Mahlknecht J, Merkel BJ, et al. Evaluation of the recharge processes and impacts of irrigation on groundwater using CFCs and radiogenic isotopes in Silao–Romita basin, Mexico. Hydrogeol J. 2008;16:1601–1614. doi: 10.1007/s10040-008-0318-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Casique E, Escolero OA, Arce JL. Resultados del pozo San Lorenzo Tezonco y sus implicaciones en el entendimiento de la hidrogeología regional de la cuenca de México. Rev Mex Cienc Geol. 2014;31(1):64–75. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Olea-Olea S, Escolero O, Mahlknecht J, et al. Identification of the components of a complex groundwater flow system subjected to intensive exploitation. J South Am Earth Sci. 2019;98:102434. doi: 10.1016/j.jsames.2019.102434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Quezadas J., Heilweil VM, Cortés-Silva A, et al. A multi-tracer approach to delineate groundwater dynamics in the Río Actopan Basin, Veracruz state, Mexico. Hydrogeol J. 2016;24(8):1953–1966. doi: 10.1007/s10040-016-1445-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). 2004. Conjunto de datos vectoriales y toponímicos, escala 1: 50,000. México. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Comisión Estatal de Agua de Guanajuato (CEA), Dirección General de Planeación, Dirección de Estudios y Monitoreo. 2018. Compendio del agua subterránea en Guanajuato. Gobierno del estado de Guanajuato. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez J. 1987. Resumen de la Geología de la Sierra de Guanajuato. In: Simposio sobre la geología de la región de Guanajuato. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. p. 50–70. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Comisión Estatal de Agua y Saneamiento de Guanajuato (CEASG). 2001. Sinopsis: Estudios hidrogeológicos y modelos matemáticos de los acuíferos del estado de Guanajuato, Guanajuato, Mexico. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Cortés A, Durazo J. Tendencia del Oxígeno-18 en la precipitación del centro de México. Ing Hidraul Mex. 2001;XIV:93–102. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• SSA (Secretaría de Salubridad y Asistencia). 1994. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-014-SSA1-1993, Procedimientos sanitarios para el muestreo de agua para uso y consumo humano en sistemas de abastecimiento de agua públicos y privados: México, SSA. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• CENAM (Centro Nacional de Metrología). 1994. Manual de Buenas Prácticas de Laboratorio: Centro Nacional de Metrología. Publicación Técnica. CNM-MRD-PT-008:104. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Geological Survey. Processing of Water Samples: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations. book 9. chap A5. edited by Wilde, F.D. 2002. https://doi.org/10.3133/twri09A5.
   Google Scholar
• EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1997. Determination of inorganic anions in drinking water by ion chromatography, Method 300.1. United States Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein S, Mayeda T. Variation of 18O content of waters from natural sources. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1953;4:213–224. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(53)90051-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehre MH, Geilmann J, Richter RA, et al. Continuous flow 2H/1H and 18O/16O analysis of water samples with dual inlet precision. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2004;18:2650–2660. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coplen TB. Normalization of oxygen and hydrogen isotope data. Chem Geol Isot Geosci Sect. 1988;72(4):293–297. doi: 10.1016/0168-9622(88)90042-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everitt BS, Hothorn T. A handbook of statistical analyses using R. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Christophersen N, Hooper RP. Multivariate analysis of stream water chemical data: the use of principal components analysis for the end member mixing problem. Water Resour Res. 1992;28(1):99–107. doi: 10.1029/91WR02518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laaksoharju M, Skårman C, Skårman E. Multivariate mixing and mass balance (M3) calculations, a new tool for decoding hydrogeochemical information. Appl Geochem. 1999;14(7):861–871. doi: 10.1016/S0883-2927(99)00024-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper RP. Diagnostic tools for mixing models of stream water chemistry. Water Resour Res. 2009;39(3):1055.
   Google Scholar
• Morales-Casique E, Guinzberg-Belmont J, Ortega-Guerrero A. Regional groundwater flow and geochemical evolution in the Amacuzac River Basin, Mexico. Hydrogeol J. 2016;24:1873–1890. doi: 10.1007/s10040-016-1423-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suk H, Lee KK. Characterization of a ground water hydrochemical system through multivariate analysis: clustering into ground water zones. Ground Water. 1999;37(3):358–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb01112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long AJ, Valder JF. Multivariate analyses with end member mixing to characterize groundwater flow: wind cave and associated aquifers. J Hydrol. 2011;409(1–2):315–327. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward JH. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc. 1963;58:236–244. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki R, Shimodaira H. Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(12):1540–1542. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig H. Isotopic variations in meteoric waters. Science. 1961;133:1702–1703. doi: 10.1126/science.133.3465.1702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassenaar LI, Van Wilgenburg SL, Larson K, et al. A groundwater isoscape (δD, δ18O) for Mexico. J Geochem Explor. 2009;102:123–136. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2009.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Quezadas J, Cortés-Silva A, Inguaggiato S, et al. Meteoric isotopic gradient on the windward side of the Sierra Madre Oriental area, Veracruz-Mexico. Geofis Int. 2015;54(3):267–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Murillo R, Durán-Quesada AM, Esquivel-Hernández G, et al. Deciphering key processes controlling rainfall isotopic variability during extreme tropical cyclones. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4321. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12062-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Statistical treatment of data on environmental isotopes in precipitation. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency; 1992; (Technical reports series; No. 331).
   Google Scholar
• Prol-Ledesma RM, Carrillo-de la Cruz JL, Torres-Vera MA, et al. Heat flow map and geotermal resources in Mexico. Terra Digitalis. 2018;2(2):1–15. doi: 10.22201/igg.25940694.2018.2.51
   Google Scholar
• Clark I, Fritz P. Environmental isotopes in hydrology. Boca Raton (FL): Lewis Publishers/CRC Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar