References
- Sclafani A. Macronutrient-conditioned flavor preferences. In: H-R Berthoud, R Seeley, editor. Neural and metabolic control of macronutrient intake. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1999. p. 93–107.
- Bodnar RJ, Lewis-Levy SR, Kest B. Feeding and drinking. Behavioral genetics of the mouse, volume I: genetics of behavioral phenotypes. Section 3: autonomous and motor behaviors, Chapter 12. WE Crusio, F Sluyter, RT Gerlai S Pietropaolo, editors. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2013. p. 97–108.
- Lewis SR, Ahmed S, Dym C, Khaimova E, Kest B, Bodnar RJ. Inbred mouse strain survey of sucrose intake. Physiol Behav. 2005;85:546–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.06.003
- Lewis SR, Dym C, Chai C, Singh A, Kest B, Bodnar RJ. Genetic variance contributes to ingestive processes: a survey of eleven inbred mouse strains for fat (Intralipid) intake. Physiol Behav. 2007;90:82–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.08.028
- Kraft TT, Huang D, Lolier M, Warshaw D, LaMagna S, Natanova E, et al. BALB/c and SWR inbred mice differ in post-oral fructose appetition as revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests. Physiol Behav. 2016;153:64–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.10.020
- Sclafani A, Zukerman S, Ackroff K. Fructose- and glucose-conditioned preferences in FVB mice: strain differences in post-oral sugar appetition. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2014;307:R1448–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00312.2014
- Sclafani A, Zukerman S, Ackroff K. Post-oral glucose sensing, not caloric content, determines sugar reward in C57BL/6J mice. Chem Senses. 2015;40:245–58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjv002
- Dym CT, Pinhas A, Ginzberg M, Kest B, Bodnar RJ. Genetic variance contributes to naltrexone-induced inhibition of sucrose intake in inbred and outbred mouse strains. Brain Res. 2007;1135:136–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.012
- Dym CT, Pinhas A, Robak M, Sclafani A, Bodnar RJ. Genetic variance contributes to dopamine receptor antagonist-induced inhibition of sucrose intake in inbred and outbred mouse strains. Brain Res. 2009;1257:40–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.12.042
- Dym CT, Bae V, Kraft TT, Yakubov Y, Winn A, Sclafani A, et al. Genetic variance contributes to dopamine and opioid receptor antagonist-induced inhibition of intralipid (fat) intake in inbred and outbred mouse strains. Brain Res. 2010;1316:51–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.12.021
- Kraft TT, Huang D, Natanova E, Lolier M, Yakubov Y, LaMagna S, et al. Dopamine D1 and opioid receptor antagonist-induced reductions of fructose and saccharin intake in BALB/c and SWR mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2015;131:13–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2015.01.010
- Bourie F, Olsson K, Iskhakov B, Buras A, Fazilov G, Shenouda M, et al. Murine genetic variance in muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonism of sucrose and saccharin solution intakes in three inbred mouse strains. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2017;163:50–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2017.10.007
- Iskhakov B, Dohnalova P, Iskhakova J, Mustac T, Yuabov A, Macanian J, et al. Murine genetic variance in muscarinic receptor antagonism of acquisition and expression of fat-conditioned flavor preferences in three inbred mouse strains. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2019;187:172792. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2019.172792
- Pinhas A, Aviel M, Koen M, Gurgov S, Acosta V, Israel M, et al. Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice. Physiol Behav. 2012;105:451–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.09.010
- Kraft TT, Yakubov Y, Huang D, Fitzgerald G, Acosta V, Natanova E, et al. Dopamine D1 and opioid receptor antagonism effects on the acquisition and expression of fat-conditioned flavor preferences in BALB/c and SWR mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2013;110:127–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2013.06.009
- Iskhakov B, Bourie FR, Shenouda M, Fazilov G, Buras A, Bhattacharjee D, et al. Murine genetic variance in muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonism of acquisition and expression of sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in three inbred mouse strains. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2018;172:1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2018.06.005
- Dym CT, Kraft TT, Bae VS, Yakubov Y, Touzani K, Sclafani A, et al. Double dissociation of D1 and opioid receptor antagonism effects on the acquisition of sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in BALB/c and SWR mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2012;103:26–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2012.07.018
- Fazilov G, Shenouda M, Buras A, Iskhakov B, Bhattacharjee D, Dohnalova P, et al. Acquisition and expression of sucrose conditioned flavor preferences following dopamine D1, opioid and NMDA receptor antagonism in C57BL/6 mice. Nutr Neurosci. 2019; in press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415x.2018.1544333.
- Kraft TT, Huang D, Lolier M, Warshaw D, LaMagna S, Natanova E, et al. NMDA receptor antagonism differentially reduces acquisition and expression of sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in BALB/c and SWR mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2016;148:76–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2016.06.007
- Kraft TT, Huang D, LaMagna S, Warshaw D, Natanova E, Sclafani A, et al. Acquisition and expression of fat-conditioned flavor preferences are differentially affected by NMDA receptor antagonism in BALB/c and SWR mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 2017;799:26–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.01.034
- Davis C, Patte K, Levitan R, Reid C, Tweed S, Curtis C. From motivation to behaviour: a model of reward sensitivity, overeating, and food preferences in the risk profile for obesity. Appetite. 2007;48:12–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2006.05.016
- Stice E, Yokum S, Burger KS, Epstein LH, Small DM. Youth at risk for obesity show greater activation of striatal and somatosensory regions to food. J Neurosci. 2011;31:4360–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6604-10.2011
- Wang GJ, Volkow ND, Thanos PK, Fowler JS. Imaging of brain dopamine pathways: Implications for understanding obesity. J Addict Med. 2009;3:8–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0b013e31819a86f7
- Stice E, Yokum S, Blum K, Bohon C. Weight gain is associated with reduced striatal response to palatable food. J Neurosci. 2010;30:13105–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2105-10.2010
- Geiger BM, Behr GG, Frank LE, Caldera-Siu AD, Beinfeld MC, Kokkotou EG, et al. Evidence for defective mesolimbic dopamine exocytosis in obesity-prone rats. FASEB J. 2008;22:2740–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.08-110759
- Hajnal A, Margas WM, Covasa M. Altered dopamine D2 receptor function and binding in obese OLETF rat. Brain Res Bull. 2008;75:70–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.07.019
- Thanos PK, Michaelides M, Gispert JD, Pascau J, Soto-Montenegro ML, Desco M, et al. Differences in response to food stimuli in a rat model of obesity: in-vivo assessment of brain glucose metabolism. Int J Obes. 2008;32:1171–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2008.50
- Levine AS, Murray SS, Kneip J, Grace M, Morley JE. Flavor enhances the antidipsogenic effect of naloxone. Physiol Behav. 1982;28:23–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(82)90095-6
- Kirkham TC, Blundell JE. Dual action of naloxone on feeding revealed by behavioral analysis: separate effects on initiation and termination of eating. Appetite. 1984;5:45–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(84)80049-5
- Clarkson DB, King BM, Hemmer RC, Olson GA, Kastin AJ, Olson RD. Naloxone decreases consumption of liquid and solid sucrose in vagotomized rats. Physiol Behav. 1982;29:927–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(82)90345-6
- Rockwood GA, Reid LD. Naloxone modifies sugar-water intake in rats drinking with open gastric fistulas. Physiol Behav. 1982;29:1175–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(82)90316-X
- Marks-Kaufman R, Kanarek R. Modifications of nutrient selection by naloxone in rats. Psychopharmacology. 1981;74:321–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00432739
- Marks-Kaufman R, Plager A, Kanarek R. Central and peripheral contributions of endogenous opioid systems to nutrient selection in rats. Psychopharmacology. 1985;85:414–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00429656
- Glass MJ, Grace M, Cleary JP, Billington CJ, Levine AS. Potency of naloxone’s anorectic effect in rats is dependent on diet preference. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:R217–21.
- Gosnell BA, Krahn DD, Majchrzak MJ. The effects of morphine on diet selection are dependent upon baseline diet preferences. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1990;37:207–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-3057(90)90322-9
- Golden GJ, Houpt TA. NMDA receptor in conditioned flavor-taste preference learning: blockade by MK-801 and enhancement by D-cycloserine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2007;86:587–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2007.02.004
- Dela Cruz J, Bae VS, Icaza-Cukali DP, Sampson C, Bamshad D, Samra A, et al. Critical role of NMDA but not opioid receptors in the acquisition of fat-conditioned flavor preferences in rats. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2012;98:341–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2012.10.007
- Covasa M, Hung CY, Ritter RC, Burns GA. Intracerebroventricular administration of MK-801 increases food intake through mechanisms independent of gastric emptying. Am J Phys Regul Integr Comp Phys. 2004;287:R1462–7.
- Zheng H, Kelly L, Patterson LM, Berthoud HR. Effect of brain stem NMDA-receptor blockade by MK-801 on behavioral and fos responses to vagal satiety signals. Am J Physiol. 1999;277:R1104–11.
- Akilloglu K, Binokay S, Kocahan S. The effect of neonatal N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor blockade on exploratory and anxiety-like behaviors in adult BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. Behav Brain Res. 2012;233:157–161. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2012.04.041
- Billingslea EN, Mastopaolo J, Rosse RB, Bellack AS, Deutsch SI. Interaction of stress and strain on glutamatergic neurotransmission: relevance to schizophrenia. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2003;74:351–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-3057(02)01012-2
- Bradford AM, Savage KM, Jones DN, Kalinichev M. Validation and pharmacological characterization of MK-801-induced locomotor hyperactivity in BALB/c mice as an assay for detection of novel antipsychotics. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 2010;212:155–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-010-1938-0
- Deutsch SI, Rosse RB, Paul SM, Riggs RL, Mastropaolo J. Inbred mouse strains differ in sensitivity to “popping” behavior elicited by MK-801. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1997;57:315–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-3057(96)00347-4
- Kalinichev M, Bate ST, Coggon SA, Jones DN. Locomotor reactivity to a novel environment and sensitivity to MK-801 in five strains of mice. Behav Pharmacol. 2008;19:71–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0b013e3282f3cf48