Do civil engineering systems need systematising? Tackling complexity – top 10 issues for civil engineering systems

References

• Bailer-Jones, D. M. 2003. “When Scientific Models Represent.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1): 59–74. doi: 10.1080/02698590305238
   Google Scholar
• Bailer-Jones, D. M. 2009. Scientific Models in Philosophy of Science. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blockley, D. I. 1980. The Nature of Structural Design and Safety. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
   Google Scholar
• Blockley, D. I., ed. 1992. Engineering Safety. London: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Blockley, D. I. 2008. “Managing Risks to Structures.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. ICE. Structures & buildings, London, August, Vol. 161(SB4), 231–237.
   Google Scholar
• Blockley, D. I. 2010. “The Importance of Being Process.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 27 (3): 189–199. doi: 10.1080/10286608.2010.482658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blockley, D. I. 2012a. A Very Short Introduction to Engineering. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blockley, D. I. 2012b. “Analysing Uncertainties: Towards Comparing Bayesian and Interval Probabilities.” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 37 (1–2): 30–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blockley, D. I., J. Agarwal, and P. S. Godfrey. 2012. “Infrastructure Resilience for High-Impact Low Chance Risks.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – civil engineering special issue CE6, London, November, Vol. 165, 13–19. London: Institution of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Blockley, D. I., and P. S. Godfrey. 2000. Doing It Differently. London: Thomas Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Blockley, D. I., and P. S. Godfrey. 2005. “Measuring Judgements to Improve Performance.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – civil engineering, London, August 3, Vol. 158, 124–129. London: Institution of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Blockley, D. I., and P. S. Godfrey. 2013. “On Communicating the Uncertainty of Risk.” International Review of Civil Engineering (IRECE) 4 (1): 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colyvan, M. 2008. “Is Probability the Only Coherent Approach to Uncertainty?” Risk Analysis 28 (3): 645–652. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01058.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, W. C., and D. I. Blockley. 1990. “Interval Probability Theory for Evidential Support.” International Journal of Intelligent Systems 5 (2): 183–192 doi: 10.1002/int.4550050204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elms, D. G., and C. B. Brown. 2012a. “Professional Decisions: The Central Role of Models.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 29 (3): 165–175. doi: 10.1080/10286608.2011.640752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elms, D. G., and C. B. Brown. 2012b. “Professional Decisions: Responsibilities.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 29 (3): 176–190. doi: 10.1080/10286608.2011.638058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, J., D. I. Blockley, and J. Argawal. 2008. “The Vulnerability of Structures to Unforeseen Events.” Computers and Structures 86 (10): 1042–1051. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.05.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey, P. S., J. Agarwal, and P. Dias. 2010. “Civil Engineering Systems ‘2030.”’ Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, Special Issue 27 (3): 177–187. doi: 10.1080/10286608.2010.489944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey, P. S., and R. Deakin Crick. 2013. “Systems Thinking, Systems Design and Learning Power.” International Journal for Engineering Education (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Government Office for Science. 2011. Blackett Review of High Impact Low Probability Risks. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. Accessed April 2012. http://www.bis.gov.uk/foresight
   Google Scholar
• INCOSE (International Council on Systems Engineering). 2012. “Z Guides.” Accessed May 2013. http://www.incoseonline.org.uk/Program_Files/Publications/zGuides.aspx?CatID=Publications. Also Z Guide 7. “How Systems Thinking Contributes to Systems Engineering.” Accessed May 2013. http://www.incoseonline.org.uk/Documents/zGuides/Z7_Systems_Thinking_WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• INCOSE (International Council on Systems Engineering). 2013. “SEBoK. Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge v1.1.” Accessed May 2013. http://www.sebokwiki.org/1.1/index.php?title=Main_Page
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ladyman, J. Forthcoming. “Structural Realism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2013 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/structural-realism/
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. 1979. Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quintessa. 2013. Tesla Decision Support Software, User Guide. Accessed May 2013. http://www.quintessa-online.com/TESLA/docs/TESLAUserGuide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4: 155–169. Accessed March 2013. http://engl.iastate.edu/programs/rhetoric/areas/rst/readinggroup/pdf/rittel1993.pdf doi: 10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, B. 1946. A History of Western Philosophy. London: George Allan & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2010. “Keep it Complex.” Nature 468 (Dec.): 1029–1031. doi: 10.1038/4681029a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B. A., and N. F. Pidgeon. 1998. Man-Made Disasters. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. 1973. “Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-3 (1): 28–44. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1973.5408575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar