Sustainability assessment of dwellings – a comparison of methodologies

References

• Abdul, Yetunde, and Richard Quartermaine. 2014. Delivering Sustainable Buildings: Savings and Payback. Watford: IHS BRE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alyami, Saleh H., and Yacine Rezgui. 2012. “Sustainable Building Assessment Tool Development Approach.” Sustainable Cities and Society 5: 52–62. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2012.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, Joana B., and Luis Bragança. 2012. “Sustainability Assessment and Standardisation – Steel Buildings.” In Concepts and Methods for Steel Intensive Building Projects, edited by Heli Koukkari, Luis Bragança and Samir Boudjabeur, 213–224. Portugal: European Conventition for Constructional Steelwork (ECCS).
   Google Scholar
• Araújo, Catarina, Manuela Almeida, and Luís Bragança. 2013. “Analysis of Some Portuguese Thermal Regulation Parameters.” Energy and Buildings 58: 141–150. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.11.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ATHENA. 2014. “Athena Sustainable Materials Institute Web Page.” Accessed May http://www.athenasmi.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa, José Amarilio, Ricardo Mateus, and Luís Bragança. 2013. “Adaptation of SBToolPT to Office Buildings.” International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development 4 (1): 89–97. doi:10.1080/2093761x.2012.759892.
   Google Scholar
• Berardi, Umberto. 2012. “Sustainability Assessment in the Construction Sector: Rating Systems and Rated Buildings.” Sustainable Development 20 (6): 411–424. doi:10.1002/sd.532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blok, Rijk, Emilia van Egmond, Mauritz Glaumann, and Helena Gervasio. 2011. “General Framework for Sustainability Evaluation of the Built Environment.” In Summary Report of the Cooperative Activities of the COST Action C25 – Sustainability of Constructions – Integrated Approach to Life-time Structural Engineering, edited by Luis Bragança, Heli Koukkari, Rijk Blok, Helena Gervásio, Milan Veljkovic, Zbigniew Plewako and Ruben Paul Borg, 3–30. Malta: Department of Civil & Structual Engineering of Faculty for the Built Environment, University of Malta.
   Google Scholar
• Bogenstätter, Ulrich. 2000. “Prediction and Optimization of Life-Cycle Costs in Early Design.” Building Research & Information 28 (5–6): 376–386. doi:10.1080/096132100418528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonakdar, Farshid, Ambrose Dodoo, and Leif Gustavsson. 2014. “Cost-Optimum Analysis of Building Fabric Renovation in a Swedish Multi-Story Residential Building.” Energy and Buildings 84: 662–673. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowitz, Einar, and Karin Ibenholt. 2009. “Economic Impacts of Cultural Heritage – Research and Perspectives.” Journal of Cultural Heritage 10 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2008.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BPIE (Buildings Performance Institute Europe) 2011. Europe's Buildings Under the Microscope – A Country-By-Country Review of the Energy Performance of Buildings. Brussels: BPIE.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, G. Guy, and Charles J. Kibert. 1998. “Developing Indicators of Sustainability: US Experience.” Building Research & Information 26 (1): 39–45. doi:10.1080/096132198370092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braganca, Luis, Susana M. Vieira, and Joana B. Andrade. 2014. “Early Stage Design Decisions: The Way to Achieve Sustainable Buildings at Lower Costs.” The Scientific World Journal 8. doi:10.1155/2014/365364.
   Google Scholar
• BRE Global Ltd. 2014. “BREEAM: the Environmental Assessment Method for Buildings Around The World.” Accessed April. http://www.breeam.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Bunz, K. R., G. P. Henze, and D. K. Tiller. 2006. “Survey of Sustainable Building Design Practices in North America, Europe, and Asia.” Journal of Architectural Engineering 12 (1): 33–62. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2006)12:1(33).
   Google Scholar
• Castro, Mariade Fátima, Ricardo Mateus, and Luís Bragança. 2014. “A Critical Analysis of Building Sustainability Assessment Methods for Healthcare Buildings.” Environment, Development and Sustainability: 1–32. doi:10.1007/s10668-014-9611-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CB Richard Ellis. 2009. Who Pays for Green? The Economics of Sustainable Buildings. London: CB Richard Ellis.
   Google Scholar
• Chandratilake, S. R., and W. P. S. Dias. 2013. “Sustainability Rating Systems for Buildings: Comparisons and Correlations.” Energy 59: 22–28. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.07.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danatzko, Joseph M. 2010. Sustainable Structural Design. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• De Angelis, Enrico, Giorgio Pansa, and Ermanno Serra. 2014. “Research of Economic Sustainability of Different Energy Refurbishment Strategies for an Apartment Block Building.” Energy Procedia 48: 1449–1458. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.02.164.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Communities and Local Government. 2010. Code for Sustainable Homes – Technical Guide. London: Communities and Local Government Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, Grace K. C. 2008. “Sustainable Construction – The Role of Environmental Assessment Tools.” Journal of Environmental Management 86 (3): 451–464. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbelsteen, Andy van den, and Stefan van Uffelen. 2008. “Model Comparison of the Duch Green Building Tool.” Dutch Green Building Council, Climate Design section, Faculty of Architecture of Techincal University of Delft, Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Eco-Quantum. 2013. “EcoQuantum.” Accessed December. http://www.ivam.uva.nl/index.php?id=2&L=1.
   Google Scholar
• Eichholtz, Piet, Nils Kok, and John M. Quigley. 2013. “The Economics of Green Building.” Review of Economics and Statistics 95 (1): 50–63. http://www.mitpressjournals.org/loi/rest. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandsson, Martin, and Mathias Borg. 2003. “Generic LCA-Methodology Applicable for Buildings, Constructions and Operation Services – Today Practice and Development Needs.” Building and Environment 38 (7): 919–938. doi:10.1016/s0360-1323(03)00031-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, K. M., and E. M. Rauch. 2006. Sustainable Building Rating Systems Summary. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• German Sustainable Building Council. 2010. DGNB System Brochure: Excellence Defined – Sustainable Building with a Systems Approach. Stuttgart: DGNB GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• German Sustainable Building Council. 2014. “DGNB System.” Accessed January. http://www.dgnb.de/_en/certification-system/index.php.
   Google Scholar
• Haapio, Appu, and Pertti Viitaniemi. 2008. “A Critical Review of Building Environmental Assessment Tools.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 28 (7): 469–482. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2008.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBEC (Institute for Building Environment and Energy Conservation). 2008. CASBEE for Home (Detached House) - Technical Manual 2007 Edition. 1st ed. Tokyo, Japan: IBEC.
   Google Scholar
• iiSBE (International Initiative for a Sustainable Built Environment). 2014. “iiSBE SBTool 2012.” Accessed May. http://www.iisbe.org/.
   Google Scholar
• JaGBC (Japan GreenBuild Council), and JSBC (Japan Sustainable Building Consortium). 2014. “Comprehensive Assessment System for Built Environment Efficiency (CASBEE).” Accessed March. www.ibec.or.jp/CASBEE/english/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Jrade, Ahmad, and Farzad Jalaei. 2013. “Integrating Building Information Modelling with Sustainability to Design Building Projects at the Conceptual Stage.” Building Simulation 6 (4): 429–444. doi:10.1007/s12273-013-0120-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaatz, Ewelina, David S. Root, Paul A. Bowen, and Richard C. Hill. 2006. “Advancing Key Outcomes of Sustainability Building Assessment.” Building Research & Information 34 (4): 308–320. doi:10.1080/09613210600724608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacic, Iva, and Veronika Zoller. 2015. “Building Life Cycle Optimization Tools for Early Design Phases.” Energy 92, Part 3:409–419. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, W. L. 2013. “A Comprehensive Review of Metrics of Building Environmental Assessment Schemes.” Energy and Buildings 62. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, W. L., C. K. Chau, F. W. H. Yik, J. Burnett, and M. S. Tse. 2002. “On the Study of the Credit-Weighting Scale in a Building Environmental Assessment Scheme.” Building and Environment 37 (12): 1385–1396. doi:10.1016/s0360-1323(02)00006-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEnSE Partners. 2006. “Sustainability Assessment of Buildings – Issues, Scope and Structure.” Methodology Development Towards a Label for Environmental Social and Economic Buildings, LEnSE Project, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Malmqvist, T., M. Glaumann, Å. Svenfelt, P. O. Carlson, M. Erlandsson, J. Andersson, H. Wintzell, G. Finnveden, T. Lindholm, and T. G. Malmström. 2011. “A Swedish Environmental Rating Tool for Buildings.” Energy 36 (4): 1893–1899. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.08.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markelj, Jernej, Manja Kitek Kuzman, Petra Grošelj, and Martina Zbašnik-Senegačnik. 2014. “A Simplified Method for Evaluating Building Sustainability in the Early Design Phase for Architects.” Sustainability 6 (12): 8775–8795. doi:10.3390/su6128775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateus, Ricardo, and Luís Bragança. 2009. Manual de avaliação SBToolPT-H. V2009/2. In. Portugal: iiSBE Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Mateus, Ricardo, Luis Braganca, and Heli Koukkari. 2008. “Sustainability Assessment and Rating of Portuguese Buildings.” In CIB Co-sponsored: World SB08 Melbourne: World Sustainable Building Conference, edited by Greg Foliente, Thomas Luetzkendorf, Peter Newton, and Phillip Paevere, 959–966. Melbourne: CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation).
   Google Scholar
• OpenHouse. 2013. “Open House Project.” Accessed June 2013. http://www.openhouse-fp7.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• Oti, A. H., and W. Tizani. 2015. “BIM Extension for the Sustainability Appraisal of Conceptual Steel Design.” Advanced Engineering Informatics 29 (1): 28–46. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2014.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, S., and S. Svendsen. 2010. “Method and Simulation Program Informed Decisions in the Early Stages of Building Design.” Energy and Buildings 42 (7): 1113–1119. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodangi, Mahmoud, Mohd Faris Khamdi, Arazi Idrus, Dabo B. Hammad, and Abdullahi AhmedUmar. 2014. “Best Practice Criteria for Sustainable Maintenance Management of Heritage Buildings in Malaysia.” Procedia Engineering 77: 11–19. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.07.017.
   Google Scholar
• Tarja Häkkinen et al. 2012. Sustainability and Performance Assessment and Benchmarking of Buildings - Final Report, SuperBuildings Project. Finland: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, Joel Ann, Chris Pyke, and Robert Tufts. 2013. “Implications of Trends in LEED Usage: Rating System Design and Market Transformation.” Building Research & Information 41 (4): 384–400. doi:10.1080/09613218.2013.775565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuan, Tran Huu, and Stale Navrud. 2008. “Capturing the Benefits of Preserving Cultural Heritage.” Journal of Cultural Heritage 9 (3): 326–337. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2008.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Green Building Council. 2014. “LEED homepage.” Accessed January. http://www.usgbc.org/leed.
   Google Scholar
• U.S Green Building Council. 2014. “LEED v4 for Homes Design and Construction.” Accessed June. http://www.usgbc.org/articles/getting-know-leed-homes-design-and-construction.
   Google Scholar
• VTT, Technical Research Centre of Finland. 2004. “EcoProp Brochure.” In. Filand.
   Google Scholar
• VTT, Technical Research Centre of Finland. 2013. “EcoProP 4.3.1 [software].” In. Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Wallhagen, Marita, Mauritz Glaumann, Ola Eriksson, and Ulla Westerberg. 2013. “Framework for Detailed Comparison of Building Environmental Assessment Tools.” Buildings 3 (1): 39–60. doi: 10.3390/buildings3010039
   Google Scholar