Bias and decision making – an overview systems explanation

References

• Anderson, K. L. 2014. “The Effects of Hindsight Bias on Experienced and Inexperienced Auditors, Relevance Ratings of Adverse Factors Versus Mitigating Factors.” Journal of Business & Economics Research 12 (3): 199–208.
   Google Scholar
• Arkin, R. M., A. J. Appelman, and J. M. Burger. 1980. “Social Anxiety, Self-Presentation, and the Self-Serving Bias in Causal Attribution.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38 (1): 23–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babcock, L., and G. Loewenstein. 1997. “Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (1): 109–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, J. H., and J. A. Walker. 1984. “Cognitive Biases and Their Impact on Strategic Planning.” Strategic Management Journal 5 (1): 129–137.
   Google Scholar
• Block, R. A., and D. R. Harper. 1991. “Overconfidence in Estimation: Testing the Anchoring-and-Adjustment Hypothesis’.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 49 (2): 188–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. B., and D. G. Elms. 2013. “Engineering Decisions: Framework, Process and Concerns.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 30 (3–4): 175–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. B., and D. G. Elms. 2015. “Engineering Decisions: Information, Knowledge and Understanding.” Structural Safety 52: 66–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, A. E., and Y.-C. Ho. 1975. Applied Optimal Control. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael, D. G. 1981. Structural Modelling and Optimization. Chichester: Ellis Horwood Ltd (John Wiley and Sons).
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael, D. G. 2013a. Problem Solving for Engineers. London: Taylor & Francis, CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael, D. G. 2013b. “The Conceptual Power of Control Systems Theory in Engineering Practice.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 30 (3-4): 231–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmichael, D. G. 2014. Infrastructure Investment: An Engineering Perspective. London: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael, D. G. 2015. “Incorporating Resilience Through Adaptability and Flexibility.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 32 (1-2): 31–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmichael, D. G. 2016. “Risk – A Commentary.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 33 (3): 177–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elms, D. G., and C. B. Brown. 2012a. “Professional Decisions: The Central Role of Models.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 29 (3): 165–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elms, D. G., and C. B. Brown. 2012b. “Professional Decisions: Responsibilities.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 29 (3): 176–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elms, D. G., and C. B. Brown. 2013. “Intuitive Decisions and Heuristics – An Alternative Rationality.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 30 (3-4): 274–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B. 1975. “Hindsight is Not Equal to Foresight: The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment Under Uncertainty.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1 (3): 288–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B., P. Slovic, and S. Lichtenstein. 2013. “Knowing with Certainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence.” Judgment and Decision Making 3 (4): 103–123.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. 2016. Avoiding Psychological Bias in Decision Making, MindTools.com. Accessed February 10, 2019 https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/avoiding-psychological-bias.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Klayman, J., J. B. Soll, C. Gonzalez-Vallejo, and S. Barlas. 1999. “Overconfidence: It Depends on How, What, and Whom You Ask.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 79 (3): 216–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klir, G. J. 1969. An Approach to General Systems Theory. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
   Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., S. Lichtenstein, and B. Fischhoff. 1980. “Reasons for Confidence.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6 (2): 107–118.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, V. S. Y., O. P. John, D. A. Kenny, and M. H. Bond. 2004. “Reconceptualizing Individual Differences in Self-Enhancement Bias: An Interpersonal Approach.” Psychological Review 111 (1): 94–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. 1998. “Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises.” Review of General Psychology 2 (2): 175–220.
   Google Scholar
• Pronin, E. 2007. “Perception and Misperception of Bias in Human Judgment.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (1): 37–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quattrone, G. A. 1982. “Behavioral Consequences of Attributional Bias.” Social Cognition 1 (4): 358–378.
   Google Scholar
• Schweiger, D. M., W. R. Sandberg, and J. W. Ragan. 1986. “Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil’s Advocacy, and Consensus.” Academy of Management Journal 29 (1): 51–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepperd, J., W. Malone, and K. Sweeny. 2008. “Exploring Causes of the Self-Serving Bias’.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2 (2): 895–908.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, M., S. M. Houghton, and K. Aquino. 2000. “Cognitive Biases, Risk Perception, and Venture Formation: How Individuals Decide to Start Companies.” Journal of Business Venturing 15 (2): 113–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1973. “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability.” Cognitive Psychology 5 (2): 207–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Science.” American Association for the Advancement of Science 185 (4157): 1124–1131.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. D., C. E. Houston, K. M. Etling, and N. Brekke. 1996. “A New Look at Anchoring Effects: Basic Anchoring and its Antecedents.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 125 (4): 387–402.
   Google Scholar