Multi-criteria decision analysis of timber–concrete composite floor systems in multi-storey wooden buildings

References

• Balasbaneh, A. T., and A. K. Bin Marsono. 2018. “New Residential Construction Building and Composite Post and Beam Structure Toward Global Warming Mitigation.” Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 37 (4): 1394–1402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balasbaneh, A. T., A. K. B. Marsono, and S. J. Khaleghi. 2018. “Sustainability Choice of Different Hybrid Timber Structure for Low Medium Cost Single-story Residential Building: Environmental, Economic and Social Assessment.” Journal of Building Engineering 20: 235–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcomb, J. D., and A. Curtner. 2000. “Multi-criteria Decision-making Process for Buildings.” Collection of Technical Papers. 35th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference and Exhibit (IECEC) (Cat. No. 00CH37022). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Baril, M. A., L. Sorelli, J. Réthoré, F. Baby, F. Toutlemonde, and L. Ferrara. 2016. “Effect of Casting Flow Defects on the Crack Propagation in UHPFRC Thin Slabs by Means of Stereovision Digital Image Correlation.” Construction and Building Materials 129: 182–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauers, W. K. M., E. K. Zavadskas, F. Peldschus, and Z. Turskis. 2008. “Multi-objective Decisionmaking for Road Design.” Transport 23 (3): 183–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecconi, F. R., L. C. Tagliabue, S. Maltese, and M. Zuccaro. 2017. “A Multi-criteria Framework for Decision Process in Retrofit Optioneering Through Interactive Data Flow.” Procedia Engineering 180: 859–869.
   Google Scholar
• CEN1995-1-1. 2004. Eurocode 5 - Design of timber structures - Common rules and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Daňková, J., P. Mec, and J. Šafrata. 2019. “Experimental Investigation and Performance of Timber-Concrete Composite Floor Structure with Non-metallic Connection System.” Engineering Structures 193: 207–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, A., J. Skinner, K. Crews, and T. Tannert. 2016. “Timber-Concrete-Composites Increasing the Use of Timber in Construction.” European Journal of Wood and Wood Products 74 (3): 443–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrier, E., P. Labossiere, and K. W. Neale. 2009. “Mechanical Behavior of an Innovative Hybrid Beam Made of Glulam and Ultrahigh-performance Concrete Reinforced with FRP or Steel.” Journal of Composites for Construction 14 (2): 217–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graybeal, B. 2008. “Flexural Behaviour of an Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete I-Girder.” J. Bridge Eng 13 (6): 602–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopfe, C. J., M. T. Emmerich, R. Marijt, and J. Hensen. 2012. “Robust Multi-criteria Design Optimization in Building Design.” Proceedings of Building Simulation and Optimization, Loughborough, UK. 118–125.
   Google Scholar
• Japan Research Institute. 2003. Environmental Performance Indicators Guideline for Organizations. Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Jelusic, P., and S. Kravanja. 2017. “Optimal Design of Timber-Concrete Composite Floors Based on the Multi-parametric MINLP Optimization.” Composite Structures 179: 285–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaklauskas, A., E. K. Zavadskas, J. Naimavicienė, M. Krutinis, V. Plakys, and D. Venskus. 2010. “Model for a Complex Analysis of Intelligent Built Environment.” Automation in Construction 19 (3): 326–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khorsandnia, N., H. Valipour, J. Schänzlin, and K. Crews. 2016. “Experimental Investigations of Deconstructable Timber-Concrete Composite Beams.” Journal of Structural Engineering 142 (12): 04016130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, C., A. M. Dias, R. Costa, and P. Santos. 2016. “Environmentally Friendly High-performance Timber–Concrete Panel.” Construction and Building Materials 102: 1060–1069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medineckienė, M., Z. Turskis, and E. K. Zavadskas. 2011. “Life-cycle Analysis of a Sustainable Building, Applying Multi-criteria Decision Making Method.” In The 8th International Conference “Environmental Engineering”: Selected Papers, edited by D. Čygas and K. D. Froehner, pp. 957–961.
   Google Scholar
• Motuzienė, V., A. Rogoža, V. Lapinskienė, and T. Vilutienė. 2016. “Construction Solutions for Energy Efficient Single-family House Based on Its Life Cycle Multi-criteria Analysis: A Case Study.” Journal of Cleaner Production 112: 532–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Movaffaghi, H., J. Pyykkö, and I. Yitmen. 2020. “Value-driven Design Approach for Optimal Long-span Timber-concrete Composite Floor in Multi-storey Wooden Residential Buildings.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 37 (3): 100–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moya, L., L. Domenech, A. Cardoso, and V. Baño. 2017. “Proposal of Visual Strength Grading Rules for Uruguayan Pine Timber.” Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod 75: 1017–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naud, N., L. Sorelli, A. Salenikovich, and S. Cuerrier-Auclair. 2019. “Fostering GLULAM-UHPFRC Composite Structures for Multi-storey Buildings.” Engineering Structures 188: 406–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neve, O., and L. Spencer-Allen. 2015. “Shaking Up Dance Floor Design with Timber-Concrete Composites.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Construction Materials 168 (4): 204–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogrodnik, K. 2019. “Multi-criteria Analysis of Design Solutions in Architecture and Engineering: Review of Applications and a Case Study.” Buildings 9 (12): 244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popovic, G., D. Stanujkic, and S. Stojanovic. 2012. “Investment Project Selection by Applying COPRAS Method and Imprecise Data.” Serbian Journal of Management 7 (2): 257–269.
   Google Scholar
• Russell-Smith, S. V., M. D. Lepech, R. Fruchter, and Y. B. Meyer. 2015. “Sustainable Target Value Design: Integrating Life Cycle Assessment and Target Value Design to Improve Building Energy and Environmental Performance.” Journal of Cleaner Production 88: 43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resources Allocation. London: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1990. “How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process.” European Journal of Operation Research 48 (1): 9–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1997. “That Is Not the Analytic Hierarchy Process: What the AHP Is and What It Is Not.” Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis 6: 324–335.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 2008. “Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process.” International Journal of Services Sciences 1 (1): 83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L., and L. G. Vargas. 1991. “Prediction, Projection and Forecasting.” Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Si, J., L. Marjanovic-Halburd, F. Nasiri, and S. Bell. 2016. “Assessment of Building-integrated Green Technologies: A Review and Case Study on Applications of Multi-criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Method.” Sustainable Cities and Society 27: 106–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorelli, L., N. Naud, S. Lamonthe, C. Joly-Lapalice, and P. Blanchet. 2019. “Fostering Composite Structures of UHPC and Timber.” In International Interactive Symposium on Ultra-High Performance Concrete (Vol. 2, No. 1). Iowa State University Digital Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stević, Ž. 2016. “Supplier Selection Using AHP and COPRAS Method. Strategic Management and Decision Support Systems in Strategic Management.” Subotica, 21th International Scientific Conference SM2016, 231–238.
   Google Scholar
• Stocchero, A., J. K. Seadon, R. Falshaw, and M. Edwards. 2017. “Urban Equilibrium for Sustainable Cities and the Contribution of Timber Buildings to Balance Urban Carbon Emissions: A New Zealand Case Study.” Journal of Cleaner Production 143: 1001–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez-Riestra, F., J. Estévez-Cimadevila, E. Martín-Gutiérrez, and D. Otero-Chans. 2019. “Experimental, Analytical and Numerical Vibration Analysis of Long-Span Timber-Timber Composite Floors in Self-Tensioning and Non-tensioning Configurations.” Construction and Building Materials 218: 341–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannert, T., B. Endacott, M. Brunner, and T. Vallée. 2017. “Long-term Performance of Adhesively Bonded Timber-Concrete Composites.” International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 72: 51–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toratti, T., and A. Talja. 2006. “Classification of Human Induced Floor Vibrations.” Building Acoustics 13 (3): 211–221.
   Google Scholar
• Tupenaite, L., E. K. Zavadskas, A. Kaklauskas, Z. Turskis, and M. Seniut. 2010. “Multiple Criteria Assessment of Alternatives for Built and Human Environment Renovation.” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 16 (2): 257–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. J., and D. L. Yang. 2007. “Using a Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Aid Method for Information Systems Outsourcing.” Computers and Operation Research 34 (12): 3691–3700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodard, A. C., and H. R. Milner. 2016. “Sustainability of Timber and Wood in Construction.” In Sustainability of Construction Materials, edited by Khatib, 129–157. Melbourne, Australia: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Z., X. Hu, H. Du, and X. Zhang. 2020. “Vibration Behavior of Timber-Concrete Composite Floors Under Human-Induced Excitation.” Journal of Building Engineering 32: 101744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeoh, D., M. Fragiacomo, A. Buchanan, K. Crews, J. Haskell, and B. L. Deam. 2008. “Development of Semi-prefabricated Timber-Concrete Composite Floors in Australasia.” 10th World Conference on Timber Engineering WCTE 2008, Miyazaki, Japan, CD.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K., R. Liias, and Z. Turskis. 2008. “Multi-attribute Decision-Making Methods for Assessment of Quality in Bridges and Road Construction: State-of-the-Art Surveys.” The Baltic Journal of Road & Bridge Engineering 3 (3): 152–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E., F. Peldschus, and A. Kaklauskas. 1994. Multiple Criteria Evaluation of Projects in Construction" Institute of Technological and Economic Development (ITED), Vilnius Technical University. V. Technika 226.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K., Z. Turskis, and S. Kildienė. 2014. “State of Art Surveys of Overviews on MCDM/MADM methods.” Technological and Economic Development of Economy 20 (1): 165–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K., Z. Turskis, and J. Tamošaitiene. 2010. “Risk Assessment of Construction Projects.” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 16 (1): 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar