Practical ethical frameworks for civil engineering and environmental systems

References

• Alberecht, G., and G. van Horne. 2021. Exiting the Anthropocene and Entering the Symbiocene, https://humansandnature.org/exiting-the-anthropocene-and-entering-the-symbiocene/.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE. 2017. Code of Ethics. https://www.asce.org/-/media/asce-images-and-files/career-and-growth/ethics/documents/asce-code-ethics-july-2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE. 2020. Code of Ethics. https://www.asce.org/-/media/asce-images-and-files/career-and-growth/ethics/documents/asce-code-ethics.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Avendano-Uribe, B., M. Milke, and D. Castillo-Brieva. 2022. “Participatory Modelling: Precedents and Prospects for Civil Engineering.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 39 (2): 93–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2022.2083111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergström, J., and S. W. A. Dekker. 2014. “Bridging the Macro and the Micro by Considering the Meso: Reflections on the Fractal Nature of Resilience.” Ecology and Society 19 (4): 22. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06956-190422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blockley, D. I. 2010. “The Importance of Being Process.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 27 (3): 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2010.482658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blockley, D. 2015. “Finding Resilience Through Practical Wisdom.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 32 (1-2): 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2015.1022725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blockley, D. 2020. “Practical Wisdom in an Age of Computerisation.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 37 (4): 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2020.1810675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blockley, D., and P. Dias. 2010. “Managing Conflict Through Ethics.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 27 (3): 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2010.482657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulleit. 2016. “The Engineering Way of Thinking: An Analysis”, Structure Magazine, February, https://www.structuremag.org/?p=9480.
   Google Scholar
• Bulleit. 2018. “Uncertainty in the Design and Maintenance of Social Systems.” In Social Systems Engineering: The Design of Complexity, edited by C. Garcia-Diaz, and C. Olaya. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118974414.ch2.
   Google Scholar
• Bulleit, W. M. 2013. “Uncertainty in the Design of Non-Prototypical Engineered Systems.” In Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, edited by D. Michelfelder, N. McCarthy, and D. Goldberg, Vol. 15. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7762-0_25.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, R. C. 2014. “Climate Geoengineering: Issues of Path-Dependence and Socio-Technical Lock-in.” WIRES Climate Change 5 (5): 649–661. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.296.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. J. 2012. “The Future of Automobile Society: A Socio-Technical Transitions Perspective.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (4): 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.663962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. 2010. “Engineers and Sustainability: An Inquiry into the Elusive Distinction between Macro-, Micro-, and Meso-Ethics.” Journal of Applied Ethics and Philosophy, 2, https://caep-hu.sakura.ne.jp/files/jaep_vol2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J., and L. P. Nathan. 2015. “Value Sensitive Design: Applications, Adaptations, and Critiques.” In Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design, edited by J. van den Hoven, P. Vermaas, and I. van de Poel. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6970-0_3.
   Google Scholar
• Dias, P. 2023. “System Perspectives: Clarity through Examples” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 40 (3). https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2023.2293072.
   Google Scholar
• Elms, D. G., and C. B. Brown. 2012. “Professional Decisions: Responsibilities.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 29 (3): 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2011.638058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frigo, G., C. Milchram, and R. Hillerbrand. 2023. “Designing for Care.” Science and Engineering Ethics 29: 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-023-00434-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. 2016. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press. Originally published 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, W. J., and R. Hendricks-Sturrup. 2022. “Ethics and Equity-Centred Perspectives in Engineering Systems Design.” In Handbook of Engineering Systems Design, edited by A. Maier, J. Oehmen, and P. E. Vermaas. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81159-4_34.
   Google Scholar
• Halwani, R. 2003. “Care Ethics and Virtue Ethics.” Hypatia 18 (3): 161–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2003.tb00826.x.
   Google Scholar
• Helmrich, A., M. Chester, T. R. Miller, and B. Allenby. 2023. “Lock-in: Origination and Significance Within Infrastructure Systems.” Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability 3), https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/acf7e6.
   Google Scholar
• Herkert, J. R. 2005. “Ways of Thinking About and Teaching Ethical Problem Solving: Microethics and Macroethics in Engineering.” Science and Engineering Ethics 11: 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0006-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. G., and J. M. Wetmore. 2008. “STS and Ethics: Implications for Engineering Ethics.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Third Edition, edited by E. J. Hackett, and O. Amsterdamska, 567–582. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, L. R., M. Farooque, D. Sarewitz, and D. Tomblin. 2021. “Designing Participatory Technology Assessments: A Reflexive Method for Advancing the Public Role in Science Policy Decision-Making.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 171: 120974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroes, P., M. Franssen, I. van de Poel, and M. Ottens. 2006. “Treating Socio-Technical Systems as Engineering Systems: Some Conceptual Problems.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 23 (6): 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuitert, L., L. Volker, and M. H. Hermans. 2023. “Definitely Not a Walk in the Park: Coping with Competing Values in Complex Project Networks.” Project Management Journal 54 (1): 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728221127958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maassen, A. 2012. “Heterogeneity of Lock-In and the Role of Strategic Technological Interventions in Urban Infrastructural Transformations.” European Planning Studies 20 (3): 441–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.651807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. 2007. After Virtue. 3rd ed. University of Notre Dame Press. (first published in 1981).
   Google Scholar
• Mac Suibhne, S. 2009. “‘Wrestle to be the Man Philosophy Wished to Make You’: Marcus Aurelius, Reflective Practitioner.” Reflective Practice 10 (4): 429–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940903138266.
   Google Scholar
• Madhavan, G. 2023. “Creative Intolerance.” Issues in Science and Technology 39 (4): 31–33. https://doi.org/10.58875/KHZZ7046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manders-Huits, N. 2011. “What Values in Design? The Challenge of Incorporating Moral Values Into Design.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2): 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9198-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. 2008. Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nair, I., and W. M. Bulleit. 2020. “Pragmatism and Care in Engineering Ethics.” Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (1): 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0080-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newberry. 2010. “Katrina: Macro-Ethical Issues for Engineers.” Science and Engineering Ethics 16: 535–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9167-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noddings, N. 1984. Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics & Moral Education. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peet, J. 2011. “Riches or Ruination? Has Mainstream Economics Reached its use by Date?” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 28 (4): 279–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2011.602400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., and M. E. P. Seligman. 2004. Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porse, E., and J. Lund. 2015. “Network Structure, Complexity, and Adaptation in Water Resource Systems.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 32: 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2015.1022726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Nikl, T. 2021. “Technology, Uncertainty, and the Good Life: A Stoic Perspective.” In Engineering and Philosophy. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, edited by Z. Pirtle, D. Tomblin, and G. Madhavan. Vol. 37. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70099-7_11.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. A. 2014. “Changing the Paradigm for Engineering Ethics.” Science and Engineering Ethics 20: 985–1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9491-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner - how Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Side, J. 2022. “It’s not Just the Climate That Needs Fixing.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 39 (3): 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2022.2093348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simoens, M. C., L. Fuenfschilling, and S. Leipold. 2022. “Discursive Dynamics and Lock-ins in Socio-Technical Systems: An Overview and a way Forward.” Sustainability Science 17: 1841–1853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01110-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strenge, B., and T. Schack. 2020. “AWOSE - A Process Model for Incorporating Ethical Analyses in Agile Systems Engineering.” Science and Engineering Ethics 26: 851–870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00133-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. C. 1993. Moral Boundaries.- A Political Argument for the Ethics of Care. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vallor, S. 2016. Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van de Poel, I. 2014. “Conflicting Values in Design for Values.” In Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design, edited by J. van den Hoven, P. Vermaas, and I. van de Poel. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6994-6_5-1.
   Google Scholar