Fad, fetish or fixture: contingent valuation of performing and visual arts festivals in Singapore

References

• Adams, R., 1986. A book of British music festivals. London: Robert Royce.
   Google Scholar
• AEA Consulting, 2006. Thundering hooves: maintaining the global competitive edge of Edinburgh’s festivals [online]. Full Report for Commissioned Study. Available from: http://www.scottisharts.org.uk/1/information/publications/1003373.aspx [Accessed 6 November 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Bille Hansen, T., 1997. The willingness-to-pay for the royal theatre in Copenhagen as a public good. Journal of cultural economics, 21 (1), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, A.C., 2004. Do people really care about the arts for future generations? Journal of cultural economics, 28, 275–284.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, C.M., Chambers, P.E. and Whitehead, J., 1998. Contingent valuation of quasi-public good: validity, reliability, and application to valuing a historic site. Public finance review, 26 (2), 137–154.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, T., 2005. Singapore’s cultural policy and its consequences. Critical Asian studies, 37 (4), 553–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, T., 2010. The state and the new society: the role of the arts in Singapore nation-building. Asian studies review, 34 (2), 131–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimaggio, P. and Useem, M., 1978. Social class and arts consumption. Theory and society, 5 (2), 141–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, L.C. and West, E.G., 1997. Performing arts subsidies and future generations. In: R. Towse, ed. Cultural economics: the arts, the heritage and the media industries. Lyme: Edward Elgar Publishing, 108–116.
   Google Scholar
• Ekelund, R.B. Jr and Ritenour, S., 1999. An exploratory of the Beckerian theory of time costs: symphony concert demand. American journal of economics and sociology, 58, 887–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, G., 2003. Hard-branding the cultural city – from Prado to Prada. International journal of urban and regional research, 27 (2), 417–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, M., McPherson, G. and Matheson, C., 2006. Glocalisation and Singaporean festivals. International journal of event management research, 1 (2), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi, L., et al., 2011. European art festivals: strengthening cultural diversity. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Gopinathan, S., 2008. Cultivating creative thinking in Singapore. DPU quarterly, 2, 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Herrero, L.C., et al., 2012. Who pays more for a cultural festival, tourists or locals? A certainty analysis of a contingent valuation application. International journal of tourism research, 14, 495–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunyadi, Z., Inkei, P. and Szabo, J.Z., 2006. Festival-world summary report: national survey on festivals in Hungary. Budapest: Budapest Observatory.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, L., 2012. Ambitions of a global city: arts, culture and creative economy in ‘post-crisis’ Singapore. International journal of cultural policy, 18 (3), 279–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, L., Gibson, L.-M. and Khoo, A.-L., 2006. Knowledges of the creative economy: towards a relational geography of diffusion and adaptation in Asia. Asia pacific viewpoint, 47, 173–194.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T., 2004. Creative shifts and directions. International journal of cultural policy, 10 (3), 281–299.
   Google Scholar
• Lévy-Garboua, L. and Montmarquette, C., 1996. A microeconometric study of theatre demand. Journal of cultural economics, 20, 25–50.
   Google Scholar
• Lévy-Garboua, L. and Montmarquette, C., 2002. The demand for arts. Montreal: Scientific Series, CIRANO.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, L., 2012. Constructing habitus: promoting an international arts trend at the Singapore Arts Festival. International journal of cultural policy, 18 (3), 308–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, K.F., et al., 2005. Gifts of the muse: reframing the debate about the benefits of the arts. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Information, Communication and the Arts, 2008. Renaissance city plan III public report [online]. Singapore. Available from: http://app.mica.gov.sg/Data/0/Renaissance%20City%20Plan%20III%20(Bk%201).pdf [Accessed 29 October 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Information, Communication and the Arts, 2012. Arts and culture strategic review [online]. Singapore. Available from: http://www.acsr.sg/download.aspx [Accessed 6 July 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Moore School of Business, 2002. The economic impact of the cultural industry on the state of south Carolina [online]. University of Carolina. Available from: http://www.moore.sc.edu/UserFiles/moore/Documents/Presentations%20&%20Studies/2002%20Cultural.pdf [Accessed 29 October 2011].
   Google Scholar
• National Arts Council, 2012. 2011 national population survey on the arts [online]. Available from: http://www.nac.gov.sg/docs/resources/2011-national-population-survey-on-the-arts.pdf [Accessed 21 January 2013].
   Google Scholar
• National Arts Council, 2013. Arts festival review committee report [online]. Available from: http://www.nac.gov.sg/docs/news/annexes-of-the-arts-festival-review-committee-report.pdf [Accessed 21 January 2013].
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council, 2003. Beyond productivity: information technology, innovation, and creativity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noonan, D., 2004. Valuing arts and culture: a research agenda for contingent valuation. Journal of arts management, law, and society, 34, 205–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooi, C.S., 2002. Cultural tourism & tourism cultures. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Oskala, A., et al., 2009. Encourage children today to build audiences for tomorrow. London: Arts Council England.
   Google Scholar
• Festivals, tourism and social change: remaking worlds Picard D. Robinson M. Channel View Clevedon 2006
   Google Scholar
• Rolfe, H., 1992. Arts festivals in the UK. London: Policy Studies Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar, S. and Marques, J., 2005. Valuing cultural heritage: the social benefits of restoring an old Arab tower. Journal of cultural heritage, 6, 69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz, J.A., Herrero, L.C. and Bedate, A.M., 2003. Contingent valuation and semiparametric methods: a case study of the national museum of sculpture in Valladolid, Spain. Journal of cultural economics, 27 (3–4), 241–257.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, H., 2004. Cultural festivals and regional identities in South Korea. Environment and planning D, 22 (4), 619–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M., 1998. Two essays on the economics of the arts: the demand for culture and the occupational mobility of artists. Unpublished thesis (PhD). University of Illinois, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., 2009. Issues in cultural tourism studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Snowball, J.D., 2005. Art for the masses? Justification for the public support of the arts in developing countries – two arts festivals in South Africa. Journal of cultural economics, 29 (2), 107–125.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, J. and Gopinathan, S., 2000. Education reform in Singapore: towards greater creativity and innovation? NIRA review, 7, 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E.C., 1998. Contingent valuation in arts impact studies. Journal of arts management, law, and society, 28 (3), 206–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, E.C., et al., 2002. Valuing the arts: a contingent valuation approach. Journal of cultural economics, 26 (2), 87–113.
   Google Scholar
• Throsby, C.D., 1994. The production and consumption of the arts: a view of cultural economics. Journal of economic literature, 32 (3), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Throsby, C.D., 2003. Determining the value of cultural good: how much (or how little) does contingent valuation tell Us? Journal of cultural economics, 27, 275–285.
   Google Scholar
• Throsby, C.D. and Withers, G.A., 1983. Measuring the demand for the arts as a public good: theory and empirical results. In: W.S. Hendon and J.L. Shanahan, eds. Economics of cultural decisions. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books
   Google Scholar
• Tuan, T.H. and Navrud, S., 2008. Capturing the benefits of preserving cultural heritage. Journal of cultural heritage, 9 (3), 326–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatachalam, L., 2004. The contingent valuation method: a review. Environmental impact assessment review, 24 (1), 89–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wee, C.J.W.-L., 2003. Creating high culture in the globalized “cultural desert” of Singapore. Drama review, 47 (4), 84–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R., 1984. State culture and beyond. In: L. Appignanesi, ed. Culture and the state. London: Institute of Contemporary Arts, 3–5.
   Google Scholar