561
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Trade and culture: the United States

Pages 615-628 | Received 17 Jul 2018, Accepted 29 Jan 2019, Published online: 30 Jul 2019

References

  • Acheson, K., and C. Maule. 1999. Much Ado about Culture: North American Trade Disputes. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Armstrong, S. 2000. “Magazines, Cultural Policy and Globalization: The Forced Retreat of the State.” Canadian Public Policy 26(2): 369–385. doi:10.2307/3552407.
  • Balassa, C. 2012. “The Impact of the U.S. Position in the Trade and Culture Debate: Negotiation of the Convention on the Diversity of Cultural Expressions.” In The UNESCO Convention on the Diversity of Cultural Expressions: A Tale of Fragmentation of International Law, edited by T. Kono and S. Van Uystel, 71–93. Cambridge: Intersentia.
  • Bernier, I. 2004. “The Recent Free Trade Agreements of the United States as Illustration of Their New Strategy regarding the Audiovisual Sector.” April-June. http://www.diversite-culturelle.qc.ca/fileadmin/documents/pdf/conf_seoul_ang_2004.pdf
  • Bruner, C. M. 2008. “Culture, Sovereignty, and Hollywood: UNESCO and the Future of Trade in Cultural Products.” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 40: 351–436.
  • Cambridge Dictionaries Online. http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/.
  • Chase, K. A. 2015. “Audiovisual Goods and Services in Preferential Trade Agreements.” In Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements, edited by A. Dür and M. Elsig, 218–245. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cowen, T. 2006. Good and Plenty: The Creative Successes of American Arts Funding. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Gagné, G. 2003/2004. “Cultural Sovereignty, Identity, and North American Integration: On the Relevance of the U.S.-Canada-Quebec Border.” Québec Studies 36: 29–49. doi:10.3828/qs.36.1.29.
  • Gagné, G. 2016. The Trade and Culture Debate: Evidence from US Trade Agreements. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  • Grant, P. S., and C. Wood. 2004. Blockbusters and Trade Wars: Popular Culture in a Globalized World. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre.
  • McCarthy, D. R. 2015. Power, Information Technology, and International Relations Theory: The Power and Politics of US Foreign Policy and the Internet. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA). 2001. “Impediments to Digital Trade.” Testimony by Bonnie J.K. Richardson, Vice President, Trade & Federal Affairs, Motion Picture Association of America, Washington, DC, before the House Commerce Committee Subcommittee on Commerce. Trade & Consumer Protection. May 22.
  • Mulcahy, K. V. 2000. “Cultural Imperialism and Cultural Sovereignty: U.S.-Canadian Cultural Relations.” American Review of Canadian Studies 30(2): 181–206. doi:10.1080/02722010009481050.
  • Nye, J. S. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
  • Nye, J. S., and W. A. Owens. 1996. “America’s Information Edge.” Foreign Affairs 75(2): 20–36. doi:10.2307/20047486.
  • Rioux, M., C. Deblock, G. Gagné, D. Tchéhouali, K. Fontaine-Skronski, and A. Vlassis. 2015. Pour Une Culture En Réseaux Diversifiée: Appliquer La Convention Sur La Protection Et La Promotion De La Diversité Des Expressions Culturelles (CDEC) À L’ère Du Numérique [For a Diversified Networked Culture: Bringing the Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions (CPPDCE) in the Digital Age]. Centre d’études sur l’intégration et la mondialisation, Université du Québec à Montréal, February. http://www.ieim.uqam.ca/IMG/pdf/rapportcdecvfinale.pdf
  • Roy, M. 2008. “Beyond the Main Screen: Audiovisual Services in PTAs.” In Opening Markets for Trade in Services: Countries and Sectors in Bilateral and WTO Negotiations, edited by J. A. Marchetti and M. Roy, 340–377. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schiller, H. I. 2000. Living in the Number One Country: Reflections from a Critique of American Empire. New York and London: Seven Stories Press.
  • Shi, J. 2013. Free Trade and Cultural Diversity in International Law. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart.
  • Thiec, Y. 2014. “From a Moratorium in the Conflict between Trade and Culture to the Creation of a Digital Deal for Cultural Diversity.” In Cultural Diversity in International Law: The Effectiveness of the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, edited by L. R. Hanania, 95–106. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Vlassis, A., and L. R. Hanania. 2014. “Effects of the CDCE on Trade Negotiations.” In Cultural Diversity in International Law: The Effectiveness of the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, edited by L. R. Hanania, 25–39. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Wunsch-Vincent, S. 2003. “The Digital Trade Agenda of the U.S.: Parallel Tracks of Bilateral, Regional and Multilateral Liberalization.” Aussenwirtschaft 58: 7–46.

Official Documents

GATT/WTO

United States: Free Trade Agreements

United States: Official Documents

  • (United States) Mission – Geneva. 2002. Press Release, July.
  • United States. 2002. “Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2002 (2002 TPA).” Public Law 107-210, 6 August 2002.
  • United States. 2015. “Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015 (2015 TPA).” Public Law, 29 June 2015.
  • Industry Sector Advisory Committee on Services for Trade Policy Matters (ISAC-13). Report to the President, the Congress and the United States Trade Representative on the U.S.-Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA). 17 March 2004.
  • Industry Trade Advisory Committee on Services and Finance Industries (ITAC-10). Report to the President, the Congress and the United States Trade Representative on the U.S.-Peru Free Trade Agreement (US-Peru FTA). 1 February 2006. https://ustr.gov/archive/assets/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Peru_TPA/Reports/asset_upload_file209_8983.pdf
  • United States International Trade Commission (USITC). 2018. Recent Trends in U.S. Services Trade: 2018 Annual Report, Publication Number: 4789, Investigation Number: 332-345. Washington, DC: USITC, June. https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/pub4789.pdf

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.