National icons in education: Hans Christian Andersen and the cultural policy of the canon of Danish literature

References

• Adorno, T. W. 1992-93. “On Tradition.” Telos 94: 75–82.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. 2017. Towards Dialogic Teaching. Cambridge: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Altieri, C. 1983. “An Idea and Ideal of a Literary Canon.” Critical Inquiry 10 (1): 37–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammitzbøl, L., H. Poulsen, and D. Østergren-Olsen. 2008. Vild med Dansk 7. København: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Assmann, A. 2010. “Canon and Archive.” In A Companion to Cultural Memory Studies, edited by A. Erll and A. Nünning, 97–118. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bom, A. K. 2019. “Hans Christian Andersen between Community and Commons.” In Hans Christian Andersen and Community, edited by A. K. Bom, J. Bøggild, and J. N. Frandsen, 223–242. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bom, A. K. 2020. H.C. Andersen Som Kulturelt Ikon. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bom, A. K., and C. Schaffalitzky de Muckadell. 2019. “Is the Ugly Duckling a Hero? Philosophical Inquiry as an Approach to Hans Christian Andersen’s Fairy Tales in Danish Primary School Teaching.” Forum for World Literature Studies 11 (2): 226–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandes, G. 1869/2005. “H.C. Andersen som Æventyrdigter.” In Georg Brandes - den mangfoldige, edited by J. Knudsen, 77–114. København: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Bredsdorff, E. 1975. Hans Christian Andersen. A Biography. London: Souvenir Press .
   Google Scholar
• CC (The Canon Committee) (Kanonudvalget). 2004. “Dansk Litteraturs Kanon.” Uddannelsesstyrelsens temahæfteserie 11. Undervisningsministeriet: Uddannelsesstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• de Mylius, J. 2016. Livet Og Skriften. En Bog Om H.C. Andersen. Copenhagen: Gads Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, M. R., J. Haynes, and K. Murris, eds. 2017. The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guillory, J. 1993. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jespersen, P. 1988. “Filosofi Med Børn: En Udfordring: Krogh”.
   Google Scholar
• Jespersen, P. 1993. “Filosofi Med Børn: En Let Indføring: OP”.
   Google Scholar
• Jespersen, P. 2005. “Hans Christian Andersen’s Tales and Philosophy for Children: With Manuals by per Jespersen.” https://sites.google.com/site/p4cp4c/hanschristianandersen
   Google Scholar
• Jespersen, P. n.d.-a. “Deeptales.” https://sites.google.com/site/p4cp4c/deeptales
   Google Scholar
• Jespersen, P. n.d.-b. “Mark and Deena.” https://sites.google.com/site/p4cp4c/markanddeena
   Google Scholar
• Juncker, B. 2006. Om Processen – Det Æstetiskes Betydning I Børns Kultur. Copenhagen: Tiderne Skifter.
   Google Scholar
• Kiilerich, M. V., and M. S. Mogensen. 2020. “Philosophical Dialogue on The Girl Who Trod on the Loaf.” Section for learning activities, Hans Christian Andersen Museum. Museum. https://hcandersensodense.dk/?lang=en
   Google Scholar
• Kolbas, E. D. 2001. Critical Theory and the Literary Canon. Oxford: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipman, M., A. M. Sharp, and F. S. Oscanyan. 1980. Philosophy in the Classroom. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, E. 1979. Dialogisch-Pragmatische Philosophiedidaktik. Hannover: Herman Schroedel Verlag KG.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, G. B. 1980. Philosophy & the Yong Child. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen, B. 2004. “Vi Skal Værne Om Vores Historiefortællere.” Berlingske Tidende, August 26th.
   Google Scholar
• Murris, K. 2013. “The Epistemic Challenge of Hearing Child’s Voice.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 32 (3): 245–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naji, S. 2017. “P4C in Denmark.” In History, Theory and Practice of Philosophy for Children: International Perspectives, edited by S. Naji and R. Hashim, 143–149. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. 1997. Opening Dialogue: Understanding the Dynamics of Language and Learning in the English Schoolroom. New York: Tearchers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. 2006. “Research in the Role of Classroom Discourse as it Affects Reading Comprehension.” Research in the Teaching of English 40 (4): 392–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reestorff, C. 2007. “Kulturpolitiske kanonkugler. Kulturkanonen og kulturens nationalstatslige forankring.” K&K 104: 86–108.
   Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., and M. Glina. 2013. “Comparing Student Experiences with Story Discussions in Dialogic versus Traditional Settings.” The Journal of Educational Research 106 (1): 49–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. 2017. “Negotiating Meaning in Classrooms: P4C as an Examplar of Dialogic Pedagogy.” In Philosophy for Children: Theories and Praxis in Teacher Education, edited by B. Anderson, 46–54. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen, T. B. 2017. “Vi Have Intet at Hovmode Os Over: Den Anti-antropocentriske Andersen.” Passage 77: 49–65.
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen, T. B. 2019. Skyggepunkter. Menneske, Natur Og Materialitet I H.C. Andersens Forfatterskab. Hellerup: Forlaget Spring.
   Google Scholar
• Tunbridge, J., and G. J. Ashworth. 1996. Dissonant Heritage: The Management of the past as a Resource in Conflict. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2007. Philosophy - a School of Freedom: Teaching Philosophy and Learning to Philosophize: Status and Prospects. Miollis: UNES.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 1999. Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Socio-Cultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Worley, P. 2015. “Open Thinking, Closed Questioning: Two Kinds of Open and Closed Question.” Journal of Philosophy in Schools 2: 2.
   Google Scholar