Ruin(ed) policies: why we should aim for protecting ruins regionally

References

• Ahmad, Y. 2006. “The Scope and Definitions of Heritage: From Tangible to Intangible.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 12 (3): 292–300. doi:10.1080/13527250600604639.
   Google Scholar
• Ang, I., Y. R. Isara, and P. Mar. 2015. “Cultural Diplomacy: Beyond the National Interest?” International Journal of Cultural Policy 21 (4): 365–381. doi:10.1080/10286632.2015.1042474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assmann, J. 1991. Stein und Zeit. Mensch und Gesellschaft im alten Ägypten. München: Wilhelm Fink.
   Google Scholar
• Bădescu, G. 2019. “Making Sense of Ruins: Architectural Reconstruction and Collective Memory in Belgrade.” Nationalities Papers 47 (2): 182–197. doi:10.1017/nps.2018.42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennoune, K. 2016. Report on the Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage as a Violation of Human Rights. Presented to the General Assembly at its 71st session in October 2016, Doc No A/71/317, August 9. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/CulturalRights/Pages/Intentionaldestructionofculturalheritage.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Bishop-Burney, U. S. 2017. “Prosecutor V. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi.” American Journal of International Law 111 (1): 126–132. doi:10.1017/ajil.2017.8.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, J. 2015. International Cultural Heritage Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, J., and L. Lixinski. 2020. The 2003 UNESCO Intangible Heritage Convention. A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, H. 1989. “Die Ästhetik der Ruinen.” In Der Schein des Schönen, edited by D. Kamper, and C. Wulf, 287–304. Göttingen: Steidl.
   Google Scholar
• Bolz, N. 1996. “Einleitung.” In Ruinen des Denkens. Denken in Ruinen, edited by N. Bolz, and W. van Reijen, 7–23, Frankfurt a.M: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, R. 2002. The Past in Prehistoric Societies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Calligaro, O. 2014. “From “European Cultural Heritage” to “Cultural Diversity”? The Changing Core Values of European Cultural Policy.” Politique Européenne 45: 60–85. doi:10.3917/poeu.045.0060.
   Google Scholar
• Calligaro, O. 2015. “Legitimation through Remembrance? The Changing Regimes of Historicity of European Integration.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 23 (3): 330–343. doi:10.1080/14782804.2015.1054794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, K.-C. 1983. Art, Myth, and Ritual: The Path to Political Authority in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charleton, W. 1663. CHOREA GIGANTUM, OR, The most Famous Antiquity of GREAT-BRITAN, Vulgarly called STONE-HENG, Standing on Salisbury Plain, Restored to the DANES. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=eebo;idno=A69727.0001.001. London: Henry Herringman.
   Google Scholar
• Chirikure, S., and G. Pwiti. 2008. “Community Involvement in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Management: An Assessment from Case Studies in Southern Africa and Elsewhere.” Current Anthropology 49 (3): 467–485. doi:10.1086/588496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, T. 1964. “Notes at Naples.” In The Life and Works of Thomas Cole, edited by E. S. Vessell, and L. L. Noble, 115. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [original 1832].
   Google Scholar
• Constantin François Chasseboeuf Boisgirais, Comte de Volney. [1791] 1869. Les Ruines ou Méditations sur les révolutions des empires. Paris: Desenne, Volland, Plassan.
   Google Scholar
• Cuno, J. 2008. Who Owns Antiquity?: Museums and the Battle over Our Ancient Heritage. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Cesari, C. 2010. “World Heritage and Mosaic Universalism: A View from Palestine.” Journal of Social Archaeology 10 (3): 299–324. doi:10.1177/1469605310378336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delanty, G. 2009. “The European Heritage: History, Memory, and Time.” In The SAGE Handbook of European Studies, edited by C. Rumford, 36–51. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Delanty, G. 2018. The European Heritage. A Critical Re-Interpretation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Donnachie, I. 2010. “World Heritage.” In Understanding the Politics of Heritage, edited by R. Harrison, 115–153. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. 2005. Industrial Ruins. Space, Aesthetics and Materiality. London: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Francioni, F. 2011. “The Human Dimension of International Cultural Heritage Law: An Introduction.” European Journal of International Law 22 (1): 9–16. doi:10.1093/ejil/chr018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillman, D. 2010. The Idea of Cultural Heritage. rev ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hadad, R. 2019. “Ruin Dynamics: Architectural Destruction and the Production of Sedentary Space at the Dawn of the Neolithic Revolution.” Journal of Social Archaeology 19 (1): 3–26. doi:10.1177/1469605318794241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. 2010. “The Politics of Heritage.” In Understanding the Politics of Heritage, edited by R. Harrison, 154–196. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. 2013. Heritage: Critical Approaches. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. C. 2001. “Heritage Pasts and Heritage Presents: Temporality, Meaning and the Scope of Heritage Studies.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 7 (4): 319–338. doi:10.1080/13581650120105534.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. C. 2008. “A History of Heritage.” In The Ashgate Companion to Heritage and Identity, edited by B. Graham, and P. Howard, 19–36. Farnham: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heckscher, W. S. 1936. Die Rom-Ruinen. Die geistigen Voraussetzungen ihrer Verwertung im Mittelalter und Renaissance. Würzburg: Mayr.
   Google Scholar
• Integral Development, Organization of American States, Culture in the Organization of American States. 2013. A Retrospective (1889-2013). http://scm.oas.org/pdfs/2013/CIDI03965E.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Joffroy, T. 2005. Traditional Conservation Practices in Africa. Rome: ICCROM.
   Google Scholar
• Kersel, M. M., and M. Bouchenaki. 2020. “Middle East and North Africa.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law, edited by A. F. Vrdoljak, and F. Francioni, 931–958. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kersel, M. M., and C. Luke. 2015. “Civil Societies? Heritage Diplomacy and Neo-Imperialism.” In Global Heritage: A Reader, edited by L. Meskell, 70–93. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchmair, L., and . 2015. “International Law and Public Administration: The European Charter of Local Self-Government.” Pro Publico Bono 3: 123–135.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchmair, L. 2020. “Shifting the Focus from an International Towards a More Regional Cultural Heritage Protection in the Middle East and North Africa.” World Comparative Law 53 (3): 267–285.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchmair, L. forthcoming. “Cultural Heritage.” In Elgar Encyclopedia of Human Rights, edited by C. Binder, M. Nowak, J. A. Hofbauer, and P. Janig. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. 2000. “Gibt es eine Beschleunigung der Geschichte?.” In Zeitschichten. Studien zur Historik, edited by R. Koselleck, 150–176, Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Lackenbacher, S. 1990. Le palais sans rival. Le récit de construction en Assyrie, . Paris: Éd. La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T. 2014. “Transnational Heritage in the Making. Strategies for Narrating Cultural Heritage as European in the Intergovernmental Initiative of the European Heritage Label.” Ethnologia Europaea 44 (1): 75–93. doi:10.16995/ee.1122.
   Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T., V. L. A. Čeginskas, S. Kaasik-Krogerus, K. Mäkinen, and J. Turunen, eds. 2020. Creating and Governing Cultural Heritage in the European Union. The European Heritage Label. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T., S. Thomas, and Y. Zhu, eds. 2019. Politics of Scale. New Directions in Critical Heritage Studies. New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Lenzerini, F. 2012. “The Tension between Communities’ Cultural Rights and Global Interests: The Case of the Maori Mokomokai.” In Cultural Heritage, Cultural Rights, Cultural Diversity. New Developments in International Law, edited by S. Borelli, and F. Lenzerini, 157–178. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Lixinski, L. 2013. Intangible Cultural Heritage in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lixinski, L. 2019. International Heritage Law for Communities. Exclusion and Re-Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, W. S. 2007. “Closing Pandora’s Box: Human Rights Conundrums in Cultural Heritage Protection.” In Cultural Heritage and Human Rights, edited by H. Silverman, and F. D. Ruggles, 33–52. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, D. 1997. The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lübbe, H. 2003. Im Zug der Zeit. Verkürzter Aufenthalt in der Gegenwart. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Merryman, J. H. 1986. “Two Ways of Thinking about Cultural Property.” American Journal of International Law 80 (1): 831–853. doi:10.2307/2202065.
   Google Scholar
• Meskell, L. 2002. “Negative Heritage and past Mastering in Archaeology.” Anthropological Quarterly 75 (3): 557–574. doi:10.1353/anq.2002.0050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezey, N. J. 2007. “The Paradoxes of Cultural Property.” Columbia Law Review 107: 2004–2046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michl, F. 2018. “The Protection of Cultural Goods and the Right to Property under the ECHR.” In Cultural Heritage and International Law. Objects, Means and Ends of International Protection, edited by E. Lagrange, S. Oeter, and R. Uerpmann-Wittzack, 109–127. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mortier, R. 1974. La poétique des ruines en France. Ses origines, ses variations de la Renaissance à Victor Hugo. Genève: Droz.
   Google Scholar
• Ndoro, W., and G. Wijesuriya. 2015. “Heritage Management and Conservation: From Colonization to Globalization.” In Global Heritage. A Reader, edited by L. Meskel. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Niklasson, E. 2017. “The Janus-face of European Heritage: Revisiting the Rhetoric of Europe-making in EU Cultural Politics.” Journal of Social Archaeology 17 (2): 138–162. doi:10.1177/1469605317712122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niklasson, E., and H. Hølleland. 2018. “The Scandinavian Far-right and the New Politicisation of Heritage.” Journal of Social Archaeology 18 (2): 121–148. doi:10.1177/1469605318757340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Péret, B. 1995. Ruines, ruine de ruines, Minotaure 12-13, 1939, 57-65, reprinted in ibid., Oeuvres complètes, 41–43. Vol. 7. Paris: Corti.
   Google Scholar
• Raulet, G. 1996. “Die Ruinen im ästhetischen Diskurs der Moderne.” In Ruinen des Denkens. Denken in Ruinen, edited by N. Bolz, and W. van Reijen, 179–214, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Ruskin, J. [1849] 1988. The Seven Lamps of Architecture. London: Century.
   Google Scholar
• Sassatelli, M. 2002. “Imagined Europe. The Shaping of a European Cultural Identity through EU Cultural Policy.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (4): 435–451. doi:10.1177/136843102760513848.
   Google Scholar
• Sassatelli, M. 2006. “The Logic of Europeanizing Cultural Policy.” In Transcultural Europe. Cultural Policy in a Changing Europe, edited by U. H. Meinhof and A. Triandafyllidou, 24–42. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sassatelli, M. 2009. Becoming Europeans. Cultural Identity and Cultural Policies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schmaedecke, M. 2006. “Wie viel „falsch“ ist noch „echt“? Überlegungen zum Umgang mit mittelalterlichen Burgruinen anhand von Beispielen in der Schweiz.” Archäologische Informationen 29/1&2: 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Schnapp, A. 2014. Was ist eine Ruine? Entwurf einer vergleichenden Perspektive. Göttingen: Wallstein.
   Google Scholar
• Schnapp, A. 2020. Une histoire universelle des ruines. Des origines aux Lumières. Paris: SEUIL.
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. 1911. “Die Ruine.” In Philosophische Kultur, edited by G. Simmel, 137–146. Leipzig: Dr. Werner Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. 2006. Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. 2012. “Discourses of Heritage: Implications for Archaeological Community Practice.” Nuevo Mundo Mundos Nuevos. doi:10.4000/nuevomundo.64148.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. 2020. Emotional Heritage. Visitor Engagement at Museums and Heritage Sites. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stendhal. 1961. A Roman Journal. New York: Collier. [original 1829; edited and translated by Haakon Chevalier].
   Google Scholar
• Sturm, H. 1996. “Gegenwartsformen der Vergangenheit – Zu einer Ästhetik des Diversen.” In Ruinen des Denkens. Denken in Ruinen, edited by N. Bolz, and W. van Reijen, 91–125, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Szegedy-Maszak, A. 1992. “A Perfect Ruin: Nineteenth-Century Views of the Colosseum.” Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics 2 (1): 115–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. 2000. “The Identity of Place in Neolithic Britain: Examples from South-west Scotland.” In Neolithic Orkney in Its European Context, edited by A. Ritchie, 79–87. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
   Google Scholar
• Tsien, T.-H. 1962. Written on Bamboo and Silk: The Beginnings of Chinese Books and Inscriptions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turku, H. 2018. The Destruction of Cultural Property as a Weapon of War. ISIS in Syria and Iraq. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Viollet-le-duc, E. 1854-1868. Dictionnaire raisonné de l’architecture française du XIe au XVIe siècle. Paris: B. Bance and A. Morel.
   Google Scholar
• Vrdoljak, A. F. 2018. “Prosecutor V. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi: Judgment and Sentence & Reparations Order (Int’l Crim. Ct.).” International Legal Materials 57 (1): 17–79. doi:10.1017/ilm.2018.5.
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, E. 2010. Politics, Policy and the Discourses of Heritage in Britain. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wijesuriya, G. 2003. “Are We Reinventing the Wheel? Archaeological Heritage Management under the British Colonial Rule in Sri Lanka.” In Archaeologies of the British: Explorations of Identity in the United Kingdom and Its Colonies 1600–1945, edited by S. Lawrence, 274–290. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, R. 1989. Künstliche Ruinen. Studien zu ihrer Bedeutung und Form. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
   Google Scholar
• Zucca, F. 2012. “From the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities to the Committee of the Regions.” A History of European Integration, Jean Monnet Centre of Pavia. http://jeanmonnet-pv.it/Jean_Monnet_Centre_of_Excellence/publications_files/fzucca_JM_FULLTXT.pdf
   Google Scholar