EU heritage diplomacy: entangled external and internal cultural relations

References

• Andersen, C., C. Clopot, and J. Ifversen. 2020. “Heritage and Interculturality in EU Science Diplomacy.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 7 (175). doi:10.1057/s41599-020-00668-8.
   Google Scholar
• Benincasa, L. 2017. “Word Problems and Make-Believe: Using Frame Analysis and Ethnomethodology to Explore Aspects of the Culture of Schooling.” Journal of Pedagogyy 8 (2): 77–99. doi:10.1515/jped-2017-0010.
   Google Scholar
• Björnehed, E., and J. Erikson. 2018. “Making the Most of the Frame: Developing the Analytical Potential of Frame Analysis.” Policy Studies 39 (2): 109–126. doi:10.1080/01442872.2018.1434874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čeginskas, V., and S. Kaasik-Krogerus. 2022. “Dialogue in and as European Heritage.” Journal of European Studies.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalcraft, J. 2021. “Into the Contact Zones of Heritage Diplomacy: Local Realities, Transnational Themes and International Expectations.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 34: 487–501. doi:10.1007/s10767-020-09391-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. 2018. “Heritage Diplomacy.” In Handbook of Cultural Security, edited by Y. Watanabe, 417–436. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Clopot, C., C. Andersen, and J. Oldfield. 2022. “New Diplomacy and Decolonial Heritage Practices.” In Decolonizing Colonial Heritage. New Agendas, Actors and Practices in and Beyond Europe, edited by B. Timm Knudsen, J. Oldfield, E. Buettner, and E. Zabunyan, 274–291. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dâmaso, M. 2021. Implementing the EU Strategy for International Cultural Relations. Toward a New Paradigm. CPD Perspectives. Los Angeles: Figueroa Press.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2010. Impact Assessment. Commission Staff Working Document SEC (2010) 197, 9 March 2010. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2016. Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council. Towards an EU Strategy for International Cultural Relations. JOIN(2016) 29 Final, 8 June 2016. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 1993. “Framing.” The Journal of Communication 43: 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 2007. “Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power.” Journal of CommunicationsJournal of Communications 57 (1): 163–173. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EP&C (European Parliament and the Council). 2011. “Decision No. 1194/2011/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011: Establishing a European Union Action for the European Heritage Label.” Official Journal of the European Union L303: 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• EP (European Parliament). 2012. “European Parliament Resolution of 12 May 2011 on the Cultural Dimensions of the Eu’s External Actions(2010/2161(INI)).” 7 December Official Journal of the European Union C 377E: 135–141
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., and A. Modigliani. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.” The American Journal of Sociology 95: 1–37. doi:10.1086/229213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, B., and P. Howard. 2008. “Heritage and Identity.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to Heritage and Identity, edited by P. Howard, 1–15. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. 2013. Heritage: Critical Approaches. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Helly, D. 2012. More Cultural Europe in the World. Brussels: More Europe – external cultural relations.
   Google Scholar
• Kersel, M. M., and C. Luke. 2015. “Civil Societies? Heritage Diplomacy and Neo-Imperialism.” In Global Heritage: A Reader, edited by L. Meskell, 70–93. Somerset: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T. 2016. “Politics of Tangibility, Intangibility, and Place in the Making of European Cultural Heritage in EU Heritage Policy.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 22 (10): 766–780. doi:10.1080/13527258.2016.1212386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T. 2017. “Politics of Affect in the EU Heritage Policy Discourse: An Analysis of Promotional Videos of Sites Awarded with the European Heritage Label.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 23 (8): 709–722. doi:10.1080/13527258.2017.1317649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T. 2019. “Conflicts and Reconciliation in Postmillennial Heritage Policy Discourses of the Council of Europe and the European Union.” In Dissonant Heritages and Memories in Contemporary Europe, edited by T. Lähdesmäki, L. Passerini, S. Kaasik-Krogerus, and I. van Huis, 25–50. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T. 2021. “Heritage Diplomacy Discourses in the EU: Notions on Cultural Diplomacy, Cultural Heritage, and Intercultural Dialogue Among EU Officials and Heritage Practitioners.” Ethnologia Europaea 51 (2): 48–71. doi:10.16995/ee.3039.
   Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T., and V. L. A. Čeginskas. 2022. “Conceptualization of Heritage Diplomacy in Scholarship.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 28: 635–650. doi:10.1080/13527258.2022.2054846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T., V. Čeginskas, S. Kaasik-Krogerus, K. Mäkinen, and J. Turunen. 2020. Creating and Governing Cultural Heritage in the European Union: The European Heritage Label. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T., and K. Mäkinen. 2019. “The ‘European Significance’ of Heritage: Politics of Scale in EU Heritage Policy Discourse.” In Politics of Scale. New Directions in Critical Heritage Studies, edited by T. Lähdesmäki, S. Thomas, and Y. Zhu, 36–49. New York: Berghahn’s Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T., Y. Zhu, and S. Thomas. 2019. “Introduction: Heritage and Scale.” In Politics of Scale. New Directions in Critical Heritage Studies, edited by T. Lähdesmäki, S. Thomas, and Y. Zhu, 1–18. New York: Berghahn’s Books.
   Google Scholar
• Linström, M., and W. Marais. 2012. “Qualitative News Frame Analysis: A Methodology.” Communitas 17: 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, C., and M. M. Kersel. 2012. US Cultural Diplomacy and Archaeology: Soft Power, Hard Heritage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mäkinen, K. 2019. “Interconceptualizing Europe and Peace: Identity Building Under the European Heritage Label.” In Dissonant Heritages and Memories in Contemporary Europe, edited by T. Lähdesmäki, L. Passerini, S. Kaasik-Krogerus, and I. van Huis, 51–78. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Meskell, L. 2015. “Introduction: Globalizing Heritage.” In Global Heritage: A Reader, edited by L. Meskell, 1–21. Somerset: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, M. 2013. “New Perspectives on Instrumentalism: An Empirical Study of Cultural Diplomacy.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 19 (5): 557–575. doi:10.1080/10286632.2012.704628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Z., and G. M. Kosicki. 1993. “Framing Analysis: An Approach to News Discourse.” Political Communication 10: 55–76. doi:10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963.
   Google Scholar
• PPMI and EDUCULT. 2019. Evaluation of the European Heritage Label Action. Final Report. Brussels: European Commission. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/6d66be3f-8d84-11e9-9369-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-99344265
   Google Scholar
• Reese, S. D. ”Prologue – Framing Public Life: A Bridging Model for Media Research.” In Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World, edited by S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, A. E. Grant, S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, and A. E. Grant 7–32. London: Routledge. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, J. 2007. Culture and International Relations, Narratives, Natives and Tourists. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rein, M., and D. A. Schön. 1996. “Frame-Critical Policy Analysis and Frame-Reflective Policy Practice.” Knowledge and Policy 9: 85–104. doi:10.1007/BF02832235.
   Google Scholar
• Riviera, T. 2015. Distinguishing Cultural Relations from Cultural Diplomacy: The British Council’s Relationship with Her Majesty’s Government. Los Angeles: Figueroa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. 2006. Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stille, A. 2002. Future of the Past: How the Information Age Threatens to Destroy Our Cultural Heritage. London: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Trobbiani, R. 2017. EU Cultural Diplomacy: Time to Define Strategies, Means and Complementarity with Member States. EL-CSID Policy Brief Issue. Vol. 3. Brussels: Institute for European Studies. May.
   Google Scholar
• Turunen, J. 2021. “Unlearning Narratives of Privilege: A Decolonial Reading of the European Heritage Label.” PhD thesis. JyU Dissertations 427. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• UNCHR.org. 2022. Operational Data Portal. Ukraine Refugee Situation (Unhcr.Org). Accessed 6 May 2022. https://data2.unhcr.org/en/situations/ukraine
   Google Scholar
• van Hulst, M., and D. Yanow. 2016. “From Policy “Frames” to “Framing”: Theorizing a More Dynamic, Political Approach.” American Review of Public Administration 46 (1): 92–112. doi:10.1177/0275074014533142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer, R. D., and J. R. Dominick. 2006. Mass Media Research. An Introduction. Canada: Thomson Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, T. 2015. “Heritage Diplomacy.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 21 (10): 997–1015. doi:10.1080/13527258.2015.1041412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, T. 2019. Geocultural Power: China’s Quest to Revive the Silk Roads for the Twenty-First Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar