227
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Inviting all humanity to an elite club? Understanding tensions in UNESCO’s global heritage regimes through the lens of a typology of goods

&
Pages 113-129 | Received 02 Jun 2022, Accepted 11 Oct 2022, Published online: 22 Dec 2022

References

  • Adell, N., R. F. Bendix, C. Bortolotto, and M. Tauschek, eds. 2015. Between Imagined Communities and Communities of Practice. Participation, Territory and the Making of Heritage. Göttingen: Göttingen University Press.
  • Askew, M. 2010. “The Magic List of Global Status: UNESCO, World Heritage and the Agendas of States.” In Heritage and Globalisation, edited by S. Labadi and C. Long, 19–44. London: Routledge.
  • Baslar, K. 1998. The Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind in International Law. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Bendix, R., A. Eggert, and A. Peselmann, eds. 2013. Heritage Regimes and the State. Göttingen: Göttingen University Press. https://books.openedition.org/gup/348.
  • Bertacchini, E., C. Liuzza, L. Meskell, and D. Saccone. 2016. “The Politicization of UNESCO World Heritage Decision Making.” Public Choice 167 (1–2): 95–129. doi:10.1007/s11127-016-0332-9.
  • Blake, J., and L. Lixinski, eds. 2020. The 2003 UNESCO Intangible Heritage Convention: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bortolotto, C. 2021. “Commercialization Without Over-Commercialization: Normative Conundrums Across Heritage Rationalities.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 27 (9): 857–868. doi:10.1080/13527258.2020.1858441.
  • Bradford, A. 2007. ”Regime Theory.” In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/1970/
  • Brumann, C. 2021. The Best We Share. Nation, Culture and World-Making in the UNESCO World Heritage Arena. New York: Berghahn Books.
  • Brumann, C., and D. Berliner, eds. 2016. World Heritage on the Ground: Ethnographic Perspectives. New York: Berghahn Books.
  • Cominelli, F. 2011. “Governance of Cultural Commons: The Case of Traditional Craftsmanship in France.” Accessed 11 May 2022. https://hal-paris1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00645244.
  • Coupland, R. 2001. “Humanity: What is It and How Does It Influence International Law?” International Review of the Red Cross 83 (844): 969–989. doi:10.1017/S156077550018349X.
  • Francioni, F. 2004. “Beyond State Sovereignty: The Protection of Cultural Heritage as a Shared Interest of Humanity.” Michigan Journal of International Law 25 (4): 1209–1228.
  • Francioni, F., ed. 2008. The 1972 World Heritage Convention: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gillman, D. 2010. The Idea of Cultural Heritage. Rev. ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • González, P. A., D. González-Álvarez, and J. Roura-Expósito. 2018. “ParticiPat: Exploring the Impact of Participatory Governance in the Heritage Field.” PoLar: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 41 (2): 306–318. doi:10.1111/plar.12263.
  • Hasenclever, A., P. Mayer, and V. Rittberger. 1997. Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hess, C., and E. Ostrom. 2003. “Ideas, Artifacts and Facilities: Information as a Common-Pool Resource.” Law and Contemporary Problems 66: 111–145.
  • Keohane, R. O., and D. G. Victor. 2011. “The Regime Complex for Climate Change.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (1): 7–23. doi:10.1017/S1537592710004068.
  • Krasner, S. D. 1983. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables.” In International Regimes, edited by S. D. Krasner, 1–21. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Lemkin, R. 1944. Axis Rule in Occupied Europe. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  • Lemkin, R. 1946. “Genocide.” American Scholar 15 (2): 227–230.
  • McGinnis, M. D. 2021. “New Institutional Economics: Building from Shared Foundations.” In Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School: Building a New Approach to Policy and the Social Sciences, edited by J. S. Lemke and V. Tarko, 25–46. Montreal–Kingston–Chicago: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
  • McGinnis, M. D., and E. Ostrom. 1992. “Design Principles for Local and Global Commons.” Paper prepared for presentation at a Conference on “Linking Local and Global Commons”, Harvard Center for International Affairs, Cambridge, Massachusetts, April 23–25.
  • Merryman, J. 1986. “Two Ways of Thinking About Cultural Property.” The American Journal of International Law 80 (4): 831–853. doi:10.2307/2202065.
  • Meskell, L. 2012. “The Rush to Inscribe: Reflections on the 35th Session of the World Heritage Committee, UNESCO Paris, 2011.” Journal of Field Archaeology 37 (2): 145–151. doi:10.1179/0093469012Z.00000000014.
  • Meskell, L. 2013. “Unesco’s World Heritage Convention at 40. Challenging the Economic and Political Order of International Heritage Conservation.” Current Anthropology 54 (4): 483–494. doi:10.1086/671136.
  • Meskell, L. 2015. “Transacting UNESCO World Heritage: Gifts and Exchanges on a Global Stage.” Social Anthropology 23 (1): 3–21. doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12100.
  • Meskell, L. 2018. A Future in Ruins: UNESCO, World Heritage, and the Dream of Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Meskell, L., C. Liuzza, and N. Brown. 2015. “World Heritage Regionalism: UNESCO from Europe to Asia.” International Journal of Cultural Property 22 (4): 437–470. doi:10.1017/S0940739115000247.
  • Neal, C. 2015. “Heritage and Participation.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research, edited by E. Waterton and S. Watson, 346–365. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
  • Ostrom, E. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Ostrom, V., and E. Ostrom. 1977. “Public Goods and Public Choices.” In Alternatives for Delivering Public Services: Toward Improved Performance, edited by E. S. Savas, 7–49. New York: Routledge.
  • Ostrom, V., C. M. Tiebout, and R. Warren. 1961. “The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry.” The American Political Science Review 55 (4): 831–842. doi:10.2307/1952530.
  • Proctor, R. 1990. Racial Hygiene. Medicine Under the Nazis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Rayamajhee, V., and P. Paniagua. 2021. “The Ostroms and the Contestable Nature of Goods: Beyond Taxonomies and Toward Institutional Polycentricity.” Journal of Institutional Economics 17 (1): 71–89. doi:10.1017/S1744137420000338.
  • Rittberger, V., and P. Mayer, eds. 1995. Regime Theory and International Relations, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Románková-Kuminková, E. 2017. “Lists of Intangible Cultural Heritage: The Beginning or the End of Sustainability?” In Intangible Cultural Heritage. 10th Anniversary of the Entry into Force of the 2003 UNESCO Convention Through the Prism of Sustainable Development, edited by H. Schreiber, 352–369. Warsaw: National Heritage Board of Poland.
  • Rosetti, I., C. Bertrand Cabral, A. Pereira Roders, M. Jacobs, and R. Albuquerque. 2022. “Heritage and Sustainability: Regulating Participation.” Sustainability 14 (3): 1674. doi:10.3390/su14031674.
  • Rutherford, M. 1994. Institutions in Economics: The Old and the New Institutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schreiber, H. 2017. “Intangible Cultural Heritage and Soft Power – Exploring the Relationship.” International Journal of Intangible Heritage 12: 43–57.
  • Schreiber, H. 2019. “Intangible Cultural Heritage, Europe and the EU: Dangerous Liaisons?” In Cultural Heritage in the European Union: A Critical Inquiry into Law and Policy, edited by A. Jakubowski, F. Fiorentini, and K. Hausler, 324–364. Leiden: Brill-Nijhoff.
  • Shackelford, S. J. 2009. “The Tragedy of the Common Heritage of Mankind.” Stanford Environmental Law Journal 28 (1): 109–169.
  • Shackelford, S. J. 2020. “Common Heritage of Humanity”. In Essential Concepts of Global Environmental Governance, 2nd ed., edited by J.-F. Morin and A. Orsini, 44–46. London: Routledge.
  • UNESCO. 1972. Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO. https://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/.
  • UNESCO. 2003. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO. https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention.
  • UNESCO. 2009. Summary Records of the Fourth Session of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, held in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, from 28 September to 2 October 2009 ( ITH-10-5.COM-CONF.202-4-EN).
  • UNESCO. 2013. Summary Records of the Eighth Session of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, held in Baku, Azerbaijan, from 2 to 7 December 2013 ( ITH-14-9.COM-4_Rev.-EN).
  • UNESCO. 2015. Summary Records of the Tenth Session of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, held at Windhoek, Namibia, from 30 November to 4 December 2015 ( ITH-16-11.COM-4).
  • UNESCO. 2020. Operational Directives for the Implementation of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage ( as amended at 8.GA in 2020). https://ich.unesco.org/en/directives.
  • UNESCO. 2021a. Evaluation of UNESCO’s Action in the Framework of the 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage ( IOS/EVS/PI 100).
  • UNESCO. 2021b. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention ( as amended in 2021). https://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/.
  • UNESCO. 2022. “Global Reflection on the Listing Mechanisms of the 2003 Convention.” Accessed 11 May 2022. https://ich.unesco.org/en/global-reflection-on-the-listing-mechanisms-01164.
  • UNGA. 1946. Resolution 96 (I). The Crime of Genocide. UN Doc A/RES/96(I).
  • UNGA. 1948. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.1_Convention%20on%20the%20Prevention%20and%20Punishment%20of%20the%20Crime%20of%20Genocide.pdf.
  • Winter, T. 2015. “Heritage Diplomacy.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 21 (10): 997–1015. doi:10.1080/13527258.2015.1041412.
  • Young, O. 2011. “Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Existing Knowledge, Cutting-Edge Themes, and Research Strategies.” Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences 108: 19853–19860.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.