Transgressing disciplinary boundaries: constructing alternate academic identities through collaboration with ‘the other’

References

• Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines (2nd edition). Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.
   Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, I. (1998). Justifying the evaluative state: New public management ideals in higher education. European Journal of Education, 33 (3), 299–316.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. (2008). Economic calculation, market incentives and academic identity: Breaking the research/teaching dualism? International Journal of management concepts and Philosophy, 3 (1), 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2002). A tale of three cities, or the glocalization of city management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J.P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in Discourses. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J.P. (1998). The New Literacy Studies and the social turn. Madison: University of Wisconsin—Madison, Department of Curriculum and Instruction. Mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J.P. (2001). Literacy development, early and late: Ownership, identity, and discourses. Keynote address at the International Literacy Conference—Literacy and language in global and local settings: New directions for research and teaching. November, 2001. Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J.P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, C. (2005a). On being an insider on the outside: New spaces for integrating academic literacies. Teaching in Higher Education, 10 (4), 475–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs C. (2005b). Teaching students to be literate in engineering: Whose job is it anyway? Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology (Special Issue: Engineering, Design and Technology Education), 102–108.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, C. (2007a). Towards a critical understanding of the teaching of discipline-specific academic literacies: Making the tacit explicit. Journal of Education 41, 59–81.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, C. (2007b). Mainstreaming academic literacy teaching: Implications for how AD understands its work in HE. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21 (7), 868–879.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, C. (2008). In search of discursive spaces in higher education. In Weber, E. (Ed). Educational change in South Africa: Reflections on local realities, practices and reforms, 247–266, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M., & Stierer, B. (Eds.) (2000). Student writing in higher education: New contexts. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M.R., & Street, B.V. (2006). The “academic literacies” model: Theory and applications. Theory Into Practice, 45 (4), 368–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. (2001). Student writing. Access, regulation, desire. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. (2003). An ‘academic literacies’ approach to student writing in higher education: Drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design, Language and Education, 17 (3), 192–207.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B.V. (1999). New literacies in theory and practice: What are the implications for language in education? Linguistics and Education, 10 (1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B.V. (2003). What's ‘new’ in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education 5 (2). Teachers' College Columbia. New York: http://www.tc.columbia.edu/cice/
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1989) Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, P., & Cooper, A. (2002). Teaching and learning regimes: Implicit theories and recurrent practices in the enhancement of teaching and learning through educational development programmes. Higher Education Research and Development. 21 (3), 221–240.
   Google Scholar