250
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Increasing The Socio-Cultural Relevance of Science Education for Sustainable Development

&
Pages 5-26 | Published online: 20 Aug 2013

References

  • Anderson, I. K. (2006). The relevance of science education as seen by pupils in Ghanaian junior secondary schools. A Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. University of the Western Cape, South Africa (http://www.ils.uio.no/english/rose/network/countries/uk-england/uk-england.html).
  • Annan, K. A. (2002). Foreword. In C. Flavin, H. French & G. Gardner (Eds.), State of the world 2002 (pp. xvii–xviii). New York: Norton.
  • Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Barton, A. C., & Osborne, M. D. (Eds.). (2001). Teaching science in diverse settings: Marginalized discourses and classroom practice. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming reality: A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy. London: Verso.
  • Bhaskar, R. (1993). Dialectic: The pulse of freedom. London: Verso.
  • Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. London: Routledge.
  • Bowers, C.A. (2001). Educating for eco-justice and community. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
  • Bronowski, J. (1956/1965). Science and human values (Rev. ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
  • Brown, L. R. (2008). Plan B 3.0: Mobilizing to save civilization. New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Caldin, E. F. (1949). The power and limits of science: A philosophical study. London: Chapman & Hall.
  • Cheek, D. W. (1992). Thinking constructively about science, technology and society education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Davies, I. (2004). Science and citizenship education. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1751–1763.
  • Dawson, C. (2000). Selling snake oil: Must science educators continue to promise what they can't deliver? Melbourne Studies in Education, 21 (7), 121–132.
  • Department of Education, Pretoria, South Africa. (2002). Revised national curriculum statement for grades R—9 schools: Natural sciences. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Education.
  • Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR). (1999). Sustainable Development Education Panel: First Annual Report 1998. Norwich: The Stationery Office, UK.
  • European Commission (EUR22845). (2007). Science Education NOW: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Retrieved January 13, 2010 from http://www.ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf.
  • Ewing B., Goldfinger, S., Wackernagel, M., Stechbart, M., Rizk, S. M., Reed, A., & Kitzes, J. (2008). The Ecological Footprint Atlas 2008. Oakland, CA: Global Footprint Network.
  • Fien, J. (1993). Environmental education: A pathway to sustainability? Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
  • Finger, J.M., & Schuler, P. (2004). Poor people's knowledge: Promoting intellectual property in developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Gee J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  • Glenn, J. C., Gordon, T. J., & Florescu, E. (2009). 2009 State of the Future. Washington, DC: The Millennium Project.
  • Glenn, J. C., Gordon, T. J., & Florescu, E. (2011). 2011 State of the Future. Washington, DC: The Millennium Project.
  • Global Footprint Network. (2010, March 18. Earth overshoot day 2009. Retrieved April 24, 2010, from http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/earth_overshoot_day/#WOD.
  • Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests. (J. J. Shapiro, trans.). London: Heinemann (original work published in 1968).
  • Heater, D. (1999). What is Citizenship? Cambridge: Polity Press
  • Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 645–670.
  • Holbrook, J. (2009). Meeting challenges to sustainable development in Africa through science and technology education: Conference Concept Paper. Abuja, Nigeria: ICASE African Regional Office.
  • International Council of Associations for Science Education (ICASE). (2003). Increasing the relevance of science and technology education for all for the 21st century: Framework Document. Retrieved January 10, 2010 from http://www.icaseonline.net/the.html.
  • Jenkins, E. W. (2006). The student voice and school science education. Studies in Science Education, 42, 49–88.
  • Jenkins, E. W., & Pell, R. G. (2006). The Relevance of Science Education Project (ROSE) in England: A summary of findings: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds. Available at: http://www.ils.uio.no/english/rose/network/countries/uk-england.html.
  • Kyle, W. C., Jr. (1999). Science education in developing countries: Access, equity, and ethical responsibility. Journal of the Southern Africa Association for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, 3, 1–13.
  • Kyle, W. C., Jr., (2002). Critical issues of school and teacher education reform: Transforming science teaching and learning for a new millennium. In P.A. Chakalisa, C. D. Yandilla, H. U. Emerole, I. J. Kyeleve, G. J. Ramogoro, & A.A. Babugara (Eds.) Science, technology, and mathematics education in Africa (pp xvi–xxxi, xxxv). Gaborone, Botswana: University of Botswana.
  • Kyle, W.C. Jr. (2006). The Road from Rio to Johannesburg: Where are the footpaths to/from Science Education? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 1–18.
  • Law, N., Fensham, P., Li, S., & Wei, B. (2000). Public understanding of science as basic literacy. Melbourne Studies in Education, 41 (2), 145–55, Special Issue: Science and the Citizen.
  • Malcolm, C., Gopal, N., Keane, M., Kyle, W. C., Jr. (2009). Transformative action research: Issues and dilemmas in working with two rural South African communities. In K. Setati, R. Vithal, C. Malcolm, & R. Dhunpath (Eds.), Researching possibilities in mathematics, science and technology education (pp. 193–212). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
  • McKibben, B. (2010). Eaarth: Making a life on a tough new planet. New York: Times Books.
  • Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King's College.
  • National Research Foundation Report (NRF). (2005). Key Performance Indicator Report 2004/2005. Available at: http://www.nrf.ac.za/publications/annrep/annualreport04_05.pdf.
  • Obasanjo, O., Mabogunje, A., & Okebukola, P. (Eds.). (2010). Human security in Africa: Perspectives on education, health and agriculture. Abeokuta, Nigeria: The Center for Human Security, Olusegun Obasanjo Presidential Library.
  • O'Donoghue, R. (2010, January. Science, mathematics and technology education research unlocking barriers across lived world and expert mediated frontiers of learning for a sustainable future. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Durban, South Africa, pp. 57–69.
  • Onwu, G. O. (2000). How should we educate science teachers for a changing society? South African Journal of Higher Education, 14 (3), 43–50.
  • Onwu, G. O., & Mogari, D. (2004). A model of professional development for outcomes based education science curriculum implementation: the Case of UNIVEMALASHI South Africa. Journal of Education in Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 30, 161–177.
  • Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship. Maidenhead: Open University Press
  • Roberts, D. A. (1982). Developing the concept of “curriculum emphasis” in science education. Science Education, 66, 243–260.
  • Roberts, D. A. (1988). What counts as science education? In P. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education (pp. 27–54). Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
  • Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). New York: Routledge.
  • Roth, W.-Y. (2007). Toward a dialectical notion and praxis of scientific literacy. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35, 9–24.
  • Roth, W.-Y., & Desautels, J. (Eds.). (2002). Science education as/for sociopolitical action. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Roth, W.-Y., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88, 263–291.
  • Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45, 1–42.
  • Schayegh, C. (2007). The social relevance of knowledge: Science and the formation of modern Iran, 1910s—1940s. Middle Eastern Studies, 43, 941–960.
  • Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2004). Sowing the seeds of ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education): Background, rationale, questionnaire development and data collection for ROSE—A comparative study of students' views of science and science education (pdf) (Acta Didactica 4/2004). Oslo: Dept. of Teacher Education and School Development, University of Oslo. Available at: http://www.ils.uio.no/english/rose/.html.
  • Sinnes, A. T., Kyle, W. C., Jr., & Alant, B. P. (2010, January. What is socially responsible science education? Perspectives from students in Project SUSTAIN. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Durban, South Africa, pp. 101–108.
  • Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. (1994). STS education: International perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Stears, M., Malcolm, C., & Kowlas, L. (2003). Making use of everyday knowledge in the science classroom. African Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 7, 109–118.
  • Stevenson, R. B., & Dillon, J. (Eds.). (2010). Engaging environmental education: Learning, culture and agency. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Symons, G. (1997). Sustainability in action in Britain? Godalming, UK: World Wilde Fund.
  • Tilbury, D. (1995). Environmental education for sustainability: Defining the new focus of environmental education in the 1990s. Environmental Education Research, 1 (2), 195–212.
  • Tobin, K. (2009). Research priorities for transforming urban science education. In !!!W.-M. Roth & K. Tobin, The World of Science Education: Handbook of Research in North America, pp. 451–471. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (2002). The Johannesburg summit test: What will change? Available at www.johannesburgsummit.org.
  • UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme)/WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature). (1991). Caring for the Earth: A strategy for sustainable living. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN—The World Conservation Union UNEP—United Nations Environment Programme WWF-World Wide Fund for Nature.
  • UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). (1995). Global diversity assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • UNICEF. (2003). State of the world's children 2003. New York: UNICEF. Available at www.unicef.org.
  • van Eijck, M. (2009). Scientific literacy: Past research, present conceptions, and future developments. In W.-M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), Handbook of Research in North America (pp. 245–258). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Wackernagel, M. (2008). Forward. In B. Ewing, S. Goldfinger, M. Wackernagel, M. Stechbart, S. M. Rizk, A. Reed, & J. Kitzes, J. The Ecological Footprint Atlas 2008 (pp. 1–2). Oakland, CA: Global Footprint Network.
  • WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). (December 11, 1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from: http://habitat.igc.org/open-gates/wced-ocf.htm, What is Sustainable Development section, ¶1).
  • World Bank. (2003). World Development Report 2003: Sustainable development in a dynamic world. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • World Bank. (2004a). World Development Report 2004: Making services work for poor people. New York: Oxford University Press
  • World Bank. (2004b). 2004 World Development Indicators. Washington DC: World Bank.
  • World Bank. (2004c) African Development Indicators 2004. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Ziman, J. (2000). Real science: What it is, and what it means. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.