A model for the development and transformation of Teachers' mathematical content knowledge

References

• Adler, J. (2005). Mathematics for teaching: What is it and why is it important that we talk about it? Pythagoras, 62, 2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, J., & Davis, Z. (2006). Opening another black box: Researching mathematics for teaching in mathematics teacher education. Journal for research in mathematics education, 37 (4), 270–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D.L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary school journal, 90 (4), 449–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D.L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler, (ed). Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. (pp. 83–104) Westport, CT.: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D.L., & Wilson, S. (1990). Knowing the subject and learning to teach it: examining assumptions about becoming a mathematics teacher. (Research report 90–7. East Lansing: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.) Retrieved January 24, 2012, http://ncrtl.msu.edu/http/rreports/html/rr907.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D.L., Thames, M.H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of teacher education, 59, 389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, K. (2001). Changing practices, changing knowledge: towards mathematics pedagogical content knowledge in South Africa. Pythagoras, 54, 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Cangelosi, J.S. (2003). Teaching mathematics in secondary and middle school: An interactive approach. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D.K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: the case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 12 (3), 327–345.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2006). Mathematics-for-teaching: an ongoing investigation of the mathematics that teachers (need to) know. Educational studies in mathematics, 61, 293–319.
   Google Scholar
• Dossey, J.A., McCrone, S., Giordano, F.R., & Weir, M.D. (2002). Mathematics methods and modelling for today's mathematics classroom: A contemporary approach to teaching grades 7–12. Pacific Grove, CA.: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, P. (1989). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In P. Ernest (ed). Mathematics teaching: the state of the art. (pp. 249–254.) London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Fennema, E., & Franke, M.L. (1992). Teachers' knowledge and its impact. In D.A. Grouws, (ed) Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147–164.) New York: Macmillan/NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Furinghetti, F. (2000). The history of mathematics as a coupling link between secondary and university teaching. International journal of education in science and teachnology, 31 (1), 43–51.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin, G.A. (2002). Representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. In L.D. English, (ed). Handbook of international research in mathematics education. (pp. 197–218). London: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Heid, M.K. (2010). Where's the math (in mathematics education research)? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 102–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T.P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D.A. Grouws, (ed) Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. (pp. 65–97). New York: Macmillan/NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: and introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert, (ed). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. (pp. 1–27) London: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H.C., & Ball, D.L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: results from California's mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for research in mathematics education, 35 (5), 330–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, J.A., Cooper, D.A., & Bethea, K.A. (2003). The role of mathematics Teachers' content knowledge in their teaching: A framework for research applied to a study of student teachers. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 6, 223–252.
   Google Scholar
• Kinach, B.M. (2002). A cognitive strategy for developing pedagogical content knowledge in the secondary mathematics methods course: Toward a model of effective practice. Teaching and teacher education, 18, 51–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesh, R.A., Post, T.R., & Behr, M.J. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier, (ed). Problems of representations in the teaching and learning of mathematics. (pp. 33–40) Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mamona-Downs, J., & Downs, M. (2002). Advanced mathematical thinking with a special reference to reflection on mathematical structure. In L.D. English, (ed) Handbook of international research in mathematics education.( pp. 165–195). London: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McDiarmid, G.W. (1990). Challenging prospective Teachers' beliefs during early field experience: A quixotic undertaking? Journal of Teacher Education, 41 (3), 12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mewborn, D.S. (1999). Reflective thinking among preservice elementary mathematics teachers. Journal of research in mathematics education, 30 (3), 316–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mewborn, D.S. (2003). Teachers, teaching, and their professional development. In J. Kilpatrick, W.G. Martin, & D. Schifter, (eds). A research companion to principles and standardsfor school mathematics. (pp. 45–52). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Monk, D.H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of education review, 13 (2), 125–145.
   Google Scholar
• Naidoo, D., & Parker, D. (2005). The implications of mathematics Teachers' identities and official mathematics discourses for democratic access to mathematics: research article. Perspectives in Education, 23 (1), 53–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwoudt, H.D. (1998). Beskouings oor onderrig: implikasies vir die didaktiese skoling van wiskunde- onderwysers. [Views on teaching: Implications for the didactic training of mathematics teachers.] Vanderbijlpark: PU vir CHO. Ph.D Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Oliver, J.S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in science education, 38, 261–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, P.L. (1988). Teachers' and students' cognitional knowledge for classroom teaching and learning. Educational researcher, 17 (5), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Piccolo, D. (2008). Views of content and pedagogical knowledge for teaching mathematics. School science and mathematics, 108 (2), 46–48.
   Google Scholar
• Plotz, M. (2007). Criteria for effective mathematics teacher education with regard to mathematical content knowledge for teaching. Ph.D.Thesis Potchefstroom: North-West University.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A.H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: problem solving, meta-cognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D.A. Grouws, (ed). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan/NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A.H., & Kilpatrick, J. (2008). Toward a theory of proficiency in teaching mathematics. In T. Wood & D. Tirosh, (eds). International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Vol. 2. Tools and Processes in Mathematics Teacher Education. (pp. 321–354). Rotterdam. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15 (2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard educational review, 57 (1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skemp, R. (2005). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics teacher, 77, 20–26. Retrieved January 24, 2012. www.mth.pdx.edu/~jfasteen/sum11/211Reading1Skemp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A.G. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D.A. Grouws, (ed). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. (pp. 127–146). New York: Macmillan/NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, J.A. (2004). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally. New York: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Vistro-Yu, C.P. (2005). On pedagogical knowledge in mathematics: How secondary school mathematics teachers face the challenge of teaching a new class. International journal for mathematics teaching and learning, Oct. 25. Retrieved: January 24, 2012. http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/vistroyu.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Webb, L., & Webb, P. (2004). Eastern Cape Teachers' beliefs of the nature of mathematics: implications for the introduction of in-service mathematical literacy programs for teachers. Pythagoras, 60, 13–19.
   Google Scholar