Student naï;ve conceptions in their explanations in a grade 12 physics examination

References

• Bradley, J.D., & Mosimege, M.D. (1998). Misconceptions in acids and bases: A comparative study of student teachers with different chemistry backgrounds. South African Journal of Chemistry, 51 (3), 137–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, H.L., & Mislevy, R. (2005). Intuitive test theory. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 489–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D.E., & Hammer, D. (2008). Conceptual change in physics. In S. Vosniadou (ed.), International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change (pp. 127–154). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Canpolat, N. (2006). Turkish Undergraduates' Misconceptions of Evaporation, Evaporation Rate, and Vapour Pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 28 (15), 1757–1770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clerk, D., & Rutherford, M. (2000). Language as a confounding variable in the diagnosis of misconceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 22 (7), 703–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagher, Z., & Cossman, G. (1992). Verbal explanations given by science teachers: Their nature and implications. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (4), 361–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education. (2003). National curriculum statement grades 10–12: Physical sciences. Pretoria: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• di Sessa, A.A. (1983). Phenomenology and the evolution of intuition. In D. Gentner & A. Steven (eds.), Mental models (pp. 15–33).
   Google Scholar
• di Sessa, A.A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist. Milton Keys: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eryilmaz, A. (2002). Effects of conceptual assignments and conceptual change discussions on students misconceptions and achievement regarding force and motion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (2), 1001–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grotzer, T.A. (2003). Learning to understand the forms of causality implicit inscientifically accepted explanations. Studies in Science Education, 39, 1–74.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, D. (1996). Misconceptions or p-prims: How many alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 97–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. Physics Teacher, 30, 141–158.
   Google Scholar
• Kikas, E. (2004). Teachers' conceptions and misconceptions concerning three natural phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 (5), 432–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriek, J., & Basson, I. (2008). Implementation of the new FET Physical Sciences curriculum: Teachers' perspectives. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12, 63–76.
   Google Scholar
• Larrabee, T.G., Stein, M., & Barman, C. (2006). A computer-based instrument that identifies common science misconceptions. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6 (3), 306–312.
   Google Scholar
• Mammen, K.J. (1996). Chemistry students' erroneous conceptions of limitingreagent. South African Journal of Higher Education, 10 (1), 188–193.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M. (1983). Intuitive Physics. Scientific American, 248 (4), 114–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T., & Harrison, A. (2004). Floating and sinking feelings in Middle School. Refereed paper presented at the AARE conference, Melbourne Australia (December 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Redish, E.F. (2003). Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sanger, M.J., & Greenbowe, T.J. (1997). Common student misconceptions in electrochemistry: galvanic, electrolytic, and concentration cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 377–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, N., & Vinjevold, P. (1999). Getting learning right: Report of the President's Education Initiative Research Project. Johannesburg: Joint Education Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, F., & Logue, S. (2006). An exploration of common student misconceptions in science. International Education Journal, 7 (4), 553–559.
   Google Scholar
• Tuminaro, J., & Redish, E.F. (2005). Student Use of Mathematics in the Context of Physics Problem Solving: A cognitive model. Preprint available at http://www.physics.umd.edu/perg/papers/redish/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R. (1998). The nature of students' informal science conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (8), 901–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society, the Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, L.N., Howard, R.G., & Bowe, B. (2007). Phenomenographic study of students' problem solving approaches in physics. Physical Review Special topics-Physics education Research, 3 (2), 1–12.
   Google Scholar