Evolutionary Ideas Held by Experienced South African Biology Teachers

References

• Abrie, A. L. (2010). Student teachers’ attitudes towards and willingness to teach evolution in a changing South African environment. Journal of Biological Education, 44(3), 102–107. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2010.9656205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alters, B. (2006). Evolution in the classroom. In E.C. Scott & G. Branch (Eds.), Not in our classrooms: Why intelligent design is wrong for our schools (pp. 105–129). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (2002). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Branch, G. (2006). Defending the teaching of evolution: Strategies and tactics for activists. In E.C. Scott & G. Branch (Eds.), Not in our classrooms: Why intelligent design is wrong for our schools (pp. 130–152). Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chinsamy, A., & Plaganyi, E. (2007). Accepting evolution. Evolution, 62(1), 248–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00276.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research. Mahwah, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• De Beer, J., & Ramnarain, U. (2012). The implementation of the FET Physical- and Life Sciences curricula: Opportunities and challenges. Research report prepared for the Gauteng Department of Education. Available from the Gauteng Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dempster, E. R., & Hugo, W. (2006). Introducing the concept of evolution into South African schools. South African Journal of Science, 102, 106–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, J., & Evans, E. M. (2007). Museums teach evolution. Evolution, 61, 1500–1506. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00121.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiSessa, A. A. (2008). A bird's-eye view of the ‘pieces’ vs. ‘coherence’ controversy (from the ‘pieces’ side of the fence). In S. Vonsniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 35–60). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, E. M. (2008). Conceptual change and evolutionary biology: A developmental analysis. In S. Vonsniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 263–294). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, E. M., Spiegel, A., Gram, W., Frazier, B. F., Cover, S. Tare, M., & Diamond, J. (2006). A conceptual guide to museum visitors’ understanding of evolution. Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S. (2010). Research design, as independent of methods. In C. Teddlie, & A. Tashakkori (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 237–252). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2008). Conceptual change in naïve biology. In S. Vonsniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 240–262). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr, E. (2004). What makes biology unique? Considerations on the autonomy of a scientific discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Naude, F. (2013). Christian teachers and learners’ lived experiences of teaching and learning evolution. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, S. (2009) Resubsumption: A possible mechanism for conceptual change and belief revision. Educational Psychologist, 44(1), 20–40. doi: 10.1080/00461520802616267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandor, N. (2002). Science, evolution, religion and education—Creating opportunities for learning in South Africa's schools. In W. James & L. Wilson (Eds.), The architect and the scaffold: Evolution and education in South Africa (pp. 60–64). Cape Town: HSRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, T., & Hewlett, M. (2006). Can you believe in God and Evolution? A guide for the perplexed. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, M. (2008). Teaching about ‘evolution’: More than just knowing the content! Conference proceedings of the 4th biennial conference conducted by the South African Association of Science and Technology Educators, 1–4 July. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, E. C. (2004). Evolution vs. creationism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shermer, M. (2006). Why Darwin matters: The case against intelligent design. New York: Times Books.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, L. A., & Kisiel, J. (2006). A comparative study of American, Australian, and Canadian visitors’ understanding of the nature of evolutionary theory. Paper presented at the Visitor Studies Association, Grand Rapids, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (2008). Conceptual change research: An introduction. In S. Vonsniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. xiii–xxviii). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yalvac, G. (2011). Barriers in the teaching and learning of evolutionary biology amongst Muslim teachers and learners in South African Muslim schools. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
   Google Scholar